On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 8:57 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mi, 06.03.24 14:44, Shreenidhi Shedi (shreenidhi.sh...@broadcom.com)
> wrote:
>
> > > Lennart Poettering, Berlin
> >
> > Thanks a lot for the responses Andrei, Poettering .
> > We took it from blfs in PhotonOS.
> >
>
On Mi, 06.03.24 13:06, Arseny Maslennikov (a...@cs.msu.ru) wrote:
> > The question of course is how many SSH instances you serve every
> > minute. My educated guess is that most SSH installations have a use
> > pattern that's more on the "sporadic use" side of things. There are
> > certainly
On Mi, 06.03.24 14:44, Shreenidhi Shedi (shreenidhi.sh...@broadcom.com) wrote:
> > Lennart Poettering, Berlin
>
> Thanks a lot for the responses Andrei, Poettering .
> We took it from blfs in PhotonOS.
> https://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/11.3-systemd/introduction/systemd-units.html
> We
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 12:21 PM Arseny Maslennikov wrote:
> So mode 2 only really makes sense for deployments which are only ever
> accessible from intranets with little junk traffic.
>
Which is the case for "deployments" that are *not servers* in the first
place. Many distros are oriented
On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 09:31:52AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mi, 06.03.24 11:11, Shreenidhi Shedi (shreenidhi.sh...@broadcom.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > What is the rationale behind using sshd.socket other than not keeping sshd
> > daemon running always and reducing memory
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 2:01 PM Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Mi, 06.03.24 11:11, Shreenidhi Shedi (shreenidhi.sh...@broadcom.com)
> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > What is the rationale behind using sshd.socket other than not keeping
> sshd
> > daemon running always and reducing memory
On Mi, 06.03.24 11:11, Shreenidhi Shedi (shreenidhi.sh...@broadcom.com) wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What is the rationale behind using sshd.socket other than not keeping sshd
> daemon running always and reducing memory consumption?
Note that there are two distinct modes to running sshd via socket
