Re: [systemd-devel] [networkd] dbus interface?

2016-05-18 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Wed, May 18 2016, Christian Hesse wrote: > Yuri D'Elia <wav...@thregr.org> on Mon, 2016/05/16 21:30: >> I'd like to monitor interface state changes as emitted by networkd. > > You may want to take a look at netlink-notify [0]. It does not use networkd > at all but ke

Re: [systemd-devel] [networkd] dbus interface?

2016-05-17 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Mon, May 16 2016, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> Just as a curiosity though, is there some logic in the link numbers >> given? All my links are _3[123]. Since I just need to emit some >> notifications for the time being, knowing that _XY have the same >> sequence as what is listed by networkctl

[systemd-devel] [networkd] dbus interface?

2016-05-16 Thread Yuri D'Elia
I'd like to monitor interface state changes as emitted by networkd. By monitoring the emitted signals though, it looks like the current interface is either next to useless or I don't understand it at all. For example, the PropertyChanged signal might have a path of

Re: [systemd-devel] [networkd] dbus interface?

2016-05-16 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Mon, May 16 2016, Lennart Poettering wrote: > That's actually the interface index formatted as integer > string. However, since D-Bus does not allow object path components to > start with a number it it is escaped with an underscored followed by > the ASCII code of the character... Hence "3"

Re: [systemd-devel] [networkd] dbus interface?

2016-05-16 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Mon, May 16 2016, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> For example, the PropertyChanged signal might have a path of >> "/org/freedesktop/network1/link/_33", however I have no clue what link >> _33 actually refers to. >> >> In the node /org/freedesktop/network1/link/_33 there's nothing going >> back to

Re: [systemd-devel] unit names in systemd log entries

2017-01-11 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Wed, Jan 11 2017, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2017-01-11 15:41 GMT+01:00 Yuri D'Elia <wav...@thregr.org>: >> The description is fine for looking at the status of a service (as the >> unit name is right there), but it does not help in the log, since I have >> to go and l

[systemd-devel] unit names in systemd log entries

2017-01-11 Thread Yuri D'Elia
When systemd is generating log entries for some units, it writes the human description in the syslog: systemd[xy]: Starting GnuPG cryptographic agent... systemd[xy]: Stopping GnuPG cryptographic agent... systemd[xy]: Closing GnuPG cryptographic agent... however, over time I've found this

Re: [systemd-devel] unit names in systemd log entries

2017-01-11 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Wed, Jan 11 2017, Reindl Harald wrote: >> The description is fine for looking at the status of a service (as the >> unit name is right there), but it does not help in the log, since I have >> to go and look which unit has the same description (essentially, I have >> to grep). The unit name is