I haven't inquired directly with the GCC mailing list. But it seems thier
current stance
is to implement the builtins for architectures that have the instructions to
support
them and require the architectures that do not to supply a library.
Yes libatomic_ops is ugly but necessary unless the
I have attached the output of export CFLAGS=-mcpu=v8 ; ./configure make
for systemd-214
Hopefully that will be more helpful.
Chase Rayfield
On Saturday, June 21, 2014 1:57 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On 21/06/14 08:38, Chase Rayfield wrote:
udev up to version
If I interpret that correctly, systemd would need to define
_sync_sub_and_fetch_4 when building for 32-bit processors which do not
support the __sync_sub_and_fetch operation natively.
Yes exactly... I think libatomic_ops can help with that and I have built it
from git on Sparc v8 (This flag is
hardware, Leon Sparc, and the sparc implementation being
developed at temlib.org it may also affect other architectures that I am
not aware of.
Thanks,Chase Rayfield
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http
