Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC 00/12] Bugfixes for CONFIG_VT=n

2013-12-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 28.11.13 09:08, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote: A few comments beforehand: - regarding logging in libraries: I *want* verbose errors/warnings in sd-gfx. Especially if modesetting, keymap-compilation or bus-requests fail, I want some rather verbose messages in the log.

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC 00/12] Bugfixes for CONFIG_VT=n

2013-12-10 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:35 AM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Thu, 28.11.13 09:08, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote: A few comments beforehand: - regarding logging in libraries: I *want* verbose errors/warnings in sd-gfx. Especially if modesetting,

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC 00/12] Bugfixes for CONFIG_VT=n

2013-11-28 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:44 PM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net wrote: On Wed, 27.11.13 19:48, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote: Looks pretty good. Commented on the invidiaul patches, but mostly looks good. I am not sure about the whole approach of making this a

[systemd-devel] [RFC 00/12] Bugfixes for CONFIG_VT=n

2013-11-27 Thread David Herrmann
Hi So booting without VTs is still a horrible experience on desktop-linux. If anyone tried, they were presumably running away in tears. This series is a new attempt to fix that. The first 4 patches are just small fixes/helpers. Patch 5 to 8 introduce sd-gfx and patch 9-11 add tests/examples for

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC 00/12] Bugfixes for CONFIG_VT=n

2013-11-27 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:48:35PM +0100, David Herrmann wrote: Hi So booting without VTs is still a horrible experience on desktop-linux. If anyone tried, they were presumably running away in tears. This series is a new attempt to fix that. The first 4 patches are just small

Re: [systemd-devel] [RFC 00/12] Bugfixes for CONFIG_VT=n

2013-11-27 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 27.11.13 19:48, David Herrmann (dh.herrm...@gmail.com) wrote: Looks pretty good. Commented on the invidiaul patches, but mostly looks good. I am not sure about the whole approach of making this a potentially public library though... Especially the monitor stuff sounds so specific.