On Wed, 08.04.15 10:31, Kai Hendry (hen...@webconverger.com) wrote:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, at 11:13 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
What does networkctl status say when this happens? And networkctl
status -a?
Oooh, I love those commands. Here is the output which says I'm routable:
On Sat, 04.04.15 15:33, Kai Hendry (hen...@webconverger.com) wrote:
Thanks for the reply Lennart! I'm sorry I couldn't attend your FOSSASIA
talk in Singapore. I was on holiday.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2015, at 12:16 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
something else that runs before it is hanging hence.
В Wed, 08 Apr 2015 10:31:18 +0800
Kai Hendry hen...@webconverger.com пишет:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, at 11:13 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
What does networkctl status say when this happens? And networkctl
status -a?
Oooh, I love those commands. Here is the output which says I'm routable:
On Tue, 7 Apr 2015, at 11:13 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
What does networkctl status say when this happens? And networkctl
status -a?
Oooh, I love those commands. Here is the output which says I'm routable:
http://s.natalian.org/2015-04-08/networkctl.txt
Maybe all of this has something
Thanks for the reply Lennart! I'm sorry I couldn't attend your FOSSASIA
talk in Singapore. I was on holiday.
On Sat, 4 Apr 2015, at 12:16 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
something else that runs before it is hanging hence. What does
systemctl list-jobs say before you run this and it hangs?
On Fri, 27.03.15 10:32, Kai Hendry (hen...@webconverger.com) wrote:
First, thanks for trying to help me Kai. Awesome name btw.
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, at 03:26 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
Try Type=simple to not let it wait. That is telling systemd, that the
binary
will not daemonize - athough
On Thu, 26.03.15 20:26, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote:
Kai Hendry hen...@webconverger.com schrieb:
Hi there,
How do I figure out why or where something is stuck?
http://s.natalian.org/2015-03-25/systemd-start-issue.png
`journalctl -u surf -f` prints nothing.
Binary
Hello Kai,
Kai Hendry [2015-03-27 12:18 +0800]:
Wish there was a service validator service.
Not sure what you changed, but systemd-analyze verify foo.service
might be a good start?
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian
First, thanks for trying to help me Kai. Awesome name btw.
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, at 03:26 AM, Kai Krakow wrote:
Try Type=simple to not let it wait. That is telling systemd, that the
binary
will not daemonize - athough it should be default according to [1].
It's still getting stuck with
On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, at 12:14 PM, Daurnimator wrote:
My first guess based on that screenshot is case: Simple vs simple.
No I fixed that problem. :) http://ix.io/h8U
Wish there was a service validator service.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
On 27 March 2015 at 13:32, Kai Hendry hen...@webconverger.com wrote:
It's still getting stuck with Type=simple.
http://s.natalian.org/2015-03-27/simple.png
Isn't there a better way to debug than running journalctl -u service
-f in parallel?
The frustrating thing is that the SAME service
Kai Hendry hen...@webconverger.com schrieb:
Hi there,
How do I figure out why or where something is stuck?
http://s.natalian.org/2015-03-25/systemd-start-issue.png
`journalctl -u surf -f` prints nothing.
Binary surf runs fine when I run it manually.
It probably is not stuck, it's
Hi there,
How do I figure out why or where something is stuck?
http://s.natalian.org/2015-03-25/systemd-start-issue.png
`journalctl -u surf -f` prints nothing.
Binary surf runs fine when I run it manually.
Many thanks,
___
systemd-devel mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo
