Re: [systemd-devel] Starting a socket unit that finds an active service fails

2021-01-29 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fr, 29.01.21 12:30, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensburg.de) wrote: > Hi! > > I wonder whether this is a bug: > When starting a socket unit that finds ist service active already, I get an > error > systemd[1]: libvirtd-tls.socket: Socket service libvirtd.service already > active,

Re: [systemd-devel] Starting a socket unit that finds an active service fails

2021-01-29 Thread MichaƂ Zegan
For me it is pretty logical, as in: the service started in relation to socket unit gets the respective socket. If service is already started there is no way to pass additional socket to it without restarting it. It may even listen exactly on the socket specified, just creating it on it's own. W

[systemd-devel] Starting a socket unit that finds an active service fails

2021-01-29 Thread Ulrich Windl
Hi! I wonder whether this is a bug: When starting a socket unit that finds ist service active already, I get an error systemd[1]: libvirtd-tls.socket: Socket service libvirtd.service already active, refusing. systemd[1]: Failed to listen on Libvirt TLS IP socket. When using systemd units in a