On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 20:18, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Following this thread started back in April:
>
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-April/047673.html
>
> As far as we understand there are no distributions running or
> optionally supporting systemd that
On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 18:54 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> See the positive side of this. Yocto users who will ask for the newest
> upstream systemd to be added to Yocto will be faced with the fact that
> noone did the necessary groundwork in Yocto, and once the pressure is
> high enough
On Di, 13.06.23 15:15, Richard Purdie (richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org)
wrote:
> > > Following this thread started back in April:
> > >
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-April/047673.html
> > >
> > > As far as we understand there are no distributions running or
>
On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 16:13 +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 16:01, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 15:56 +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > > Nobody is retroactively changing existing systemd releases.
> > >
> > > Stay on a previously released
On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 15:59 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 15:52, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 15:31 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 15:15, Richard Purdie
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 11:29 +0100,
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 16:01, Richard Purdie
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 15:56 +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> > Nobody is retroactively changing existing systemd releases.
> >
> > Stay on a previously released systemd version which will continue to
> > have features it used to
Nobody is retroactively changing existing systemd releases.
Stay on a previously released systemd version which will continue to have
features it used to have.
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023, 15:53 Richard Purdie, <
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 15:31 +0100, Luca
On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 15:56 +0100, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
> Nobody is retroactively changing existing systemd releases.
>
> Stay on a previously released systemd version which will continue to
> have features it used to have.
I've seen the responses to bug reports with "not latest" releases
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 15:52, Richard Purdie
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 15:31 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 15:15, Richard Purdie
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 11:29 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 20:18, Luca Boccassi
On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 15:31 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 15:15, Richard Purdie
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 11:29 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 20:18, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > Following this
On Tue, 13 Jun 2023 at 15:15, Richard Purdie
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 11:29 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 20:18, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Following this thread started back in April:
> > >
> > >
On Tue, 2023-06-13 at 11:29 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 20:18, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Following this thread started back in April:
> >
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-April/047673.html
> >
> > As far as we understand
On Tue, 20 Sept 2022 at 20:18, Luca Boccassi wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Following this thread started back in April:
>
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-April/047673.html
>
> As far as we understand there are no distributions running or
> optionally supporting systemd that
On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 12:52 PM TJ wrote:
> On 05/11/2022 10:36, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 12:06 PM TJ wrote:
> >
> >> Just seen this announcement in the v252 changelog:
> >>
> >> "We intend to remove support for split-usr (/usr mounted separately
> >> during boot) ..."
On 05/11/2022 11:32, Luca Boccassi wrote:
Does it also affect the command-line options "mount.usr=,
mount.usrfstype=, mount.usrflags=, usrhash=, systemd.verity_usr_data=,
systemd.verity_usr_hash=, systemd.verity_usr_options=" as per "man 7
kernel-command-line" ?
No, that is unrelated. This
On Sat, 5 Nov 2022, 10:53 TJ, wrote:
> On 05/11/2022 10:36, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 12:06 PM TJ wrote:
> >
> >> Just seen this announcement in the v252 changelog:
> >>
> >> "We intend to remove support for split-usr (/usr mounted separately
> >> during boot) ..."
> >>
On 05/11/2022 10:36, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 12:06 PM TJ wrote:
Just seen this announcement in the v252 changelog:
"We intend to remove support for split-usr (/usr mounted separately
during boot) ..."
How does this align with support for separate /usr/ with dm-verity
On Sat, Nov 5, 2022 at 12:06 PM TJ wrote:
> Just seen this announcement in the v252 changelog:
>
> "We intend to remove support for split-usr (/usr mounted separately
> during boot) ..."
>
> How does this align with support for separate /usr/ with dm-verity ?
>
> For example, this will affect
Just seen this announcement in the v252 changelog:
"We intend to remove support for split-usr (/usr mounted separately
during boot) ..."
How does this align with support for separate /usr/ with dm-verity ?
For example, this will affect nspawn. See "man 1 systemd-nspawn" and
"--root-hash="
On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 14:40 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 13:21 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 11:39 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, 2022-09-20 at 19:18 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > > > > Following this thread started back in
On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 13:21 +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 11:39 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2022-09-20 at 19:18 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > > > > > Following this thread started back in April:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
On Wed, 2022-10-26 at 11:39 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-09-20 at 19:18 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Following this thread started back in April:
> >
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-April/047673.html
> >
> > As far as we understand
On Tue, 2022-09-20 at 19:18 +, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Following this thread started back in April:
>
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-April/047673.html
>
> As far as we understand there are no distributions running or
> optionally supporting systemd
Hello,
Following this thread started back in April:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2022-April/047673.html
As far as we understand there are no distributions running or
optionally supporting systemd that have not either completed, or at
least started, the transition to
24 matches
Mail list logo
