Re: [systemd-devel] Unmentioned 209 change: 80-net-name-slot.rules is gone

2014-02-23 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Jason A. Donenfeld at 21/02/14 16:12 did gyre and gimble: To clarify things: 1. Arch's script deals with 80-net-setup-link.rules 2. freedesktop.org wiki followed suit and added that suggestion 3. Others have said elsewhere that the proper way to do this is actually to

Re: [systemd-devel] Unmentioned 209 change: 80-net-name-slot.rules is gone

2014-02-23 Thread Dave Reisner
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 05:12:56PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: To clarify things: 1. Arch's script deals with 80-net-setup-link.rules We (Arch) made a decision back when the persistent naming was added to make it opt-in by masking 80-net-name-slot.rules in /etc. Now, if the 209 upgrade

Re: [systemd-devel] Unmentioned 209 change: 80-net-name-slot.rules is gone

2014-02-23 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: I've now added a paragraph about this change to NEWS. Not sure what to do in the Fedora package though. Why not do the same as in the Arch package? Are there any drawbacks? I thought that should cover

Re: [systemd-devel] Unmentioned 209 change: 80-net-name-slot.rules is gone

2014-02-23 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:45:09AM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 12:13 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl wrote: I've now added a paragraph about this change to NEWS. Not sure what to do in the Fedora package though. Why not do the same as in the

Re: [systemd-devel] Unmentioned 209 change: 80-net-name-slot.rules is gone

2014-02-21 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote: Hey guys, This commit caught me by surprise: http://git.zx2c4.com/systemd/commit/?id=daeb71a36a98834664e4d95773a3629b746f4db8 It wasn't in the NEWS or the mailing list post for 209, so when updating I

Re: [systemd-devel] Unmentioned 209 change: 80-net-name-slot.rules is gone

2014-02-21 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:24:58PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote: Hey guys, This commit caught me by surprise: http://git.zx2c4.com/systemd/commit/?id=daeb71a36a98834664e4d95773a3629b746f4db8 It wasn't in

Re: [systemd-devel] Unmentioned 209 change: 80-net-name-slot.rules is gone

2014-02-21 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 21/02/14 17:37, Colin Guthrie wrote: 'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 21/02/14 13:58 did gyre and gimble: On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 02:24:58PM +0100, Tom Gundersen wrote: On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld ja...@zx2c4.com wrote: Hey guys, This commit

Re: [systemd-devel] Unmentioned 209 change: 80-net-name-slot.rules is gone

2014-02-21 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
To clarify things: 1. Arch's script deals with 80-net-setup-link.rules 2. freedesktop.org wiki followed suit and added that suggestion 3. Others have said elsewhere that the proper way to do this is actually to override 99-default.link instead. 4. Gentoo went with number 3. Now: 5. Can numbers

[systemd-devel] Unmentioned 209 change: 80-net-name-slot.rules is gone

2014-02-20 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
Hey guys, This commit caught me by surprise: http://git.zx2c4.com/systemd/commit/?id=daeb71a36a98834664e4d95773a3629b746f4db8 It wasn't in the NEWS or the mailing list post for 209, so when updating I encountered a bit of unexpected behavior. I see that I can disable persistent names using