How does this interact with snapshots? While I was looking at man
systemctl it seems that one uses isolate to restore to a previous
snapshot:
Snapshot Commands
snapshot [NAME]
Create a snapshot. If a snapshot name is specified, the new
snapshot will be named after it. If
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 10:40:31AM -0500, Chris Atkinson wrote:
I created a named snapshot:
$ sudo systemctl snapshot derpy
derpy.snapshot
I tried restoring the named snapshot, but the mandatory mangling
to .target got in the way:
$ sudo systemctl isolate derpy.snapshot
Failed to
The commit (5e03c6e3b517286bbd65b48d88f60e5b83721894) seems to be
having some side effects.
When I attempt to query status, stop or start a service I get
the following:
$ sudo systemctl stop transmission
Assertion 'suffix' failed at src/shared/unit-name.c:515, function
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 01:09:18PM -0500, Chris Atkinson wrote:
The commit (5e03c6e3b517286bbd65b48d88f60e5b83721894) seems to be
having some side effects.
When I attempt to query status, stop or start a service I get
the following:
$ sudo systemctl stop transmission
Assertion 'suffix'
Commit e80733be33e52d8ab2f1ae845326d39c600f5612 seems to have done the
trick.
I'm able to start, stop and status services, isolate .target
and .snapshot files and a filename with no extension following
isolate is treated as a .target, all of which seems right.
The systemctl man page will still
On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 02:02:24PM -0500, Chris Atkinson wrote:
Commit e80733be33e52d8ab2f1ae845326d39c600f5612 seems to have done the
trick.
I'm able to start, stop and status services, isolate .target
and .snapshot files and a filename with no extension following
isolate is treated as a
Hi, All
I happen to notice systemctl isolate will expands foo.service to
foo.service.target, which unfortunately breaks my boot in some way.
I find the following commit:
commit 0807312
Author: Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net
Date: Mon Oct 13 15:43:09 2014 +0200
systemctl: when
В Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:11:29 +0800
WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com пишет:
Hi, All
I happen to notice systemctl isolate will expands foo.service to
foo.service.target, which unfortunately breaks my boot in some way.
I find the following commit:
commit 0807312
Author: Lennart Poettering
On 11/28/14 at 10:13am, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
В Fri, 28 Nov 2014 15:11:29 +0800
WANG Chao chaow...@redhat.com пишет:
Hi, All
I happen to notice systemctl isolate will expands foo.service to
foo.service.target, which unfortunately breaks my boot in some way.
I find the following
