Re: [systemd-devel] sigpwr.target - intended usage?

On Mon, 18.07.16 14:51, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > 2016-07-18 14:46 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering : > > I'd really recommend them to switch to SIGRMIN+4 instead. Redefining > > the meaning of SIGPWR like they are doing is certainly a bad idea. > > > > Note

Re: [systemd-devel] sigpwr.target - intended usage?

On Mon, 18.07.16 14:41, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > 2016-07-18 14:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl : > > 2016-07-18 13:54 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering : > >> On Mon, 18.07.16 13:37, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> > >>> Apparently

Re: [systemd-devel] sigpwr.target - intended usage?

2016-07-18 15:02 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering : > On Mon, 18.07.16 14:41, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> 2016-07-18 14:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl : >> > 2016-07-18 13:54 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering : >> >> On Mon,

Re: [systemd-devel] sigpwr.target - intended usage?

2016-07-18 14:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl : > 2016-07-18 13:54 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering : >> On Mon, 18.07.16 13:37, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: >> >>> Apparently SIGPWR is used by lxc-stop to shut down LXC containers. >>> What interface

Re: [systemd-devel] Problems trying to convert a System-V-Init script to systemd

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > 15.07.2016 13:28, Holger Kiehl пишет: > > I tried to avoid Type=forking and PIDFile= because I then have to maintain > > two different init versions, systemd and System-V-Init. I think there will > > always be other Unix systems around without

Re: [systemd-devel] Problems trying to convert a System-V-Init script to systemd

On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Holger Kiehl wrote: > Hello, > > I am new to systemd and the maintainer of the file distribution > software > AFD (http://www.dwd.de/AFD) and I am trying to adapt this >

Re: [systemd-devel] sigpwr.target - intended usage?

On Mon, 18 Jul 2016, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 18.07.16 14:00, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: 2016-07-18 13:54 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering : On Mon, 18.07.16 13:37, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: Apparently SIGPWR is used by lxc-stop to

Re: [systemd-devel] sigpwr.target - intended usage?

On Mon, 18.07.16 15:17, Clemens Gruber (clemens.gru...@pqgruber.com) wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 03:02:10PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Well, if they don't want to make SIGRTMIN+4 the default because they > > think sysvinit/Upstart is more relevant than systemd, then that's

Re: [systemd-devel] sigpwr.target - intended usage?

2016-07-18 13:54 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering : > On Mon, 18.07.16 13:37, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Apparently SIGPWR is used by lxc-stop to shut down LXC containers. >> What interface would you recommend instead? >> >>

Re: [systemd-devel] sigpwr.target - intended usage?

2016-07-18 15:34 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl : > > I was told that this is already configurable in lxc via lxc.haltsignal. > So afaics, lxc-create would just need to make sure to set this > accordingly on distros which use systemd by default. FYI: I've filed

Re: [systemd-devel] Reboot hangs at the very last step

18.07.2016 17:35, Frank Steiner пишет: > Hi, > > on some of our servers (all of those are NFS-servers with iscsi devices...) > rebooting sometimes hangs after > > [ OK ] Reached target Shutdown. > > The next line, the kernel mesage about resetting the system, never > shows up. Is there a way

[systemd-devel] Is %i supported in Condition?

Hi, the systemd.unit man page is not quite clear on this, i.e. which settings support which specifiers. But maybe I just missed it. I was wondering if I can use ConditionPathExists=/dev/%i Seems like this would e.g. be useful in getty@.service, which currently has ConditionPathExists=/dev/tty0

Re: [systemd-devel] sigpwr.target - intended usage?

On Sat, 16.07.16 17:22, Christian Hofstaedtler (c...@zeha.at) wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to understand how sigpwr.target is intended to be used, > but couldn't find a good explanation. systemd.special says this > target is invoked in a power fail situation, but what should happen > then? > >

Re: [systemd-devel] sigpwr.target - intended usage?

Apparently SIGPWR is used by lxc-stop to shut down LXC containers. What interface would you recommend instead? https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/2015-May/009279.html 2016-07-18 12:36 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering : > On Sat, 16.07.16 17:22, Christian

Re: [systemd-devel] sigpwr.target - intended usage?

On Mon, 18.07.16 13:37, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > Apparently SIGPWR is used by lxc-stop to shut down LXC containers. > What interface would you recommend instead? > > https://lists.linuxcontainers.org/pipermail/lxc-users/2015-May/009279.html Is that actually really used? I mean,