Hi Martin,
Am 04.12.2016 um 17:48 schrieb Martin Pitt:
Hello André,
André Hartmann [2016-12-01 11:20 +0100]:
In other words: once this symlink is valid, you cannot invalidate it by
make it a dangling symlink, you have to remove it. Can somebody confirm this
observation?
Not a dangling one,
unsubscribe
***
Hinweis zur Datensicherheit
Die Datenübertragung über das Internet erfolgt derzeit im Wesentlichen
ungesichert. Die Vertraulichkeit sensibler, personenbezogener Daten gegenüber
Dritten ist nicht gewährleistet. Es ist nicht ausgeschlossen, dass übermittelte
Daten von
Reading Lennarts recent blog post, I just wanted to make people aware
that the RestrictAddressFamilies= feature is currently broken on
several architectures, including i386. So be careful for now until
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/4575
has been fixed
--
Why is it that all of the
Btw, I think we are lacking a good systemd sandboxing howto/tutorial.
The one linked from fdo
(http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/security.html) is pretty dated and
the systemd.exec man page is not coherent enough with regards to
security/sandboxing.
Related to that, I think it would be good if we
Am 09.12.2016 um 01:56 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Btw, I think we are lacking a good systemd sandboxing howto/tutorial.
The one linked from fdo
(http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/security.html) is pretty dated and
the systemd.exec man page is not coherent enough with regards to
security/sandboxing.
You are confusing a user service (which is installed in
/usr/lib/systemd/user) with priviledge dropping via User=. Those are
different things.
2016-12-09 2:01 GMT+01:00 Reindl Harald :
>
>
> Am 09.12.2016 um 01:56 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>>
>> Btw, I think we are lacking a