On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 08:10:15PM +1000, Michael Chapman wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jul 2017, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> >Reindl Harald wrote on 04/07/17 19:50:
> >>>When new configuration options are added, the same unit file can
> >>>almost always be used with older systemd, and it'll just warn & ignore
>
Am Mittwoch, den 05.07.2017, 20:10 +1000 schrieb Michael Chapman:
> I'm pretty sure you'll find that it does. Specifically, it will fail when
> the child process for the command being executed attempts to map the
> username to a UID.
>
> The issue being discussed here is that systemd considers
Reindl Harald:
> at least fall back to “nobody”
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard:
> That idea is wrong.
>
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14681377#14682059
Reindl Harald:
> better than a stupid [...]
Not really, no. It's the same category of error, in fact: substituting an
account other than
Am 04.07.2017 um 22:33 schrieb Mariusz Wojcik:
I’m just asking because of the latest “not-a-bug” [1]. As far as I know,
there aren’t many services that need full root access (maybe for getting
a low port number). Except for that I don’t see many use cases.
Therefore, I think it would be
Am 06.07.2017 um 09:59 schrieb Jonathan de Boyne Pollard:
Reindl Harald:
> at least fall back to “nobody”
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard:
> That idea is wrong.
>
> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14681377#14682059
Reindl Harald:
> better than a stupid [...]
Not really, no. It's the
On Tue, 04 Jul 2017 at 20:33:54 +, Mariusz Wojcik wrote:
> As far as I know, there
> aren’t many services that need full root access (maybe for getting a low port
> number).
systemd system units are basically a replacement for LSB (or sysvinit
if you prefer) init scripts, which always run as
Hi,
I’m just asking because of the latest “not-a-bug” [1]. As far as I know, there
aren’t many services that need full root access (maybe for getting a low port
number). Except for that I don’t see many use cases. Therefore, I think it
would be useful to make the decision for root access more
On Wed, 5 Jul 2017, Mariusz Wojcik wrote:
Hi,
I’m just asking because of the latest “not-a-bug” [1]. As far as I know,
there aren’t many services that need full root access (maybe for getting
a low port number). Except for that I don’t see many use cases.
Therefore, I think it would be
On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Mikhail Kasimov wrote:
Hello!
've got an interesting trouble on timer-activated service -- 'systemctl
status' returns a log with 'Activating (start)' status:
[1]
==
k_mikhail@linux-mk500:~> systemctl status vba32update.service
● vba32update.service - VBA32
Hello!
've got an interesting trouble on timer-activated service -- 'systemctl
status' returns a log with 'Activating (start)' status:
[1]
==
k_mikhail@linux-mk500:~> systemctl status vba32update.service
● vba32update.service - VBA32 Anti-Virus Update Service
Loaded: loaded
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Mikhail Kasimov wrote:
06.07.2017 17:18, Michael Chapman пишет:
On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Mikhail Kasimov wrote:
Hello!
've got an interesting trouble on timer-activated service -- 'systemctl
status' returns a log with 'Activating (start)' status:
[1]
==
I'm running on a kernel with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y. I understand that
this is counter to the recommendation in the README ("We recommend to turn
off Real-Time group scheduling in the kernel when using systemd"), but
I don't have control over the kernel configuration.
On this system, it
06.07.2017 17:18, Michael Chapman пишет:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Mikhail Kasimov wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> 've got an interesting trouble on timer-activated service -- 'systemctl
>> status' returns a log with 'Activating (start)' status:
>>
>> [1]
>> ==
>> k_mikhail@linux-mk500:~> systemctl
06.07.2017 18:27, Michael Chapman пишет:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Mikhail Kasimov wrote:
>> 06.07.2017 17:18, Michael Chapman пишет:
>>> On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Mikhail Kasimov wrote:
Hello!
've got an interesting trouble on timer-activated service --
'systemctl
status' returns
06.07.2017 19:12, Mikhail Kasimov пишет:
>
> 06.07.2017 18:27, Michael Chapman пишет:
>> On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Mikhail Kasimov wrote:
>>> 06.07.2017 17:18, Michael Chapman пишет:
On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Mikhail Kasimov wrote:
> Hello!
>
> 've got an interesting trouble on
15 matches
Mail list logo
