On Mo, 03.07.23 15:21, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 03.07.2023 14:17, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mo, 03.07.23 10:58, Valentijn Sessink (valent...@sessink.nl) wrote:
> >
> > > Now my remaining question is probably so very basic, that you sort of
> > > missed
> > > it:
On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 11:21:22PM +0200, Silvio Knizek wrote:
> why is it suggested to run `named` within its own chroot? For security
> reasons? This can be achieved much easier with systemd native options.
That feature is two decades older than systemd, and name server
operators are darn
On Mo, 03.07.23 20:52, Marc Haber (mh+systemd-de...@zugschlus.de) wrote:
> (1) go fully systemd
> That would mean to get rid of bind's -t option completely but use
> systemd's RootDirectory directive instead. I have not tried this but I
> think that the bind community might be reluctant to
Hi,
Please help me understand this phenomenon (systemd 252):
$ systemctl status ctrl-alt-del.target
○ reboot.target - System Reboot
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/reboot.target; disabled; preset:
enabled)
Active: inactive (dead)
Docs: man:systemd.special(7)
$ ls -l
On 04.07.2023 14:58, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
Hi,
Please help me understand this phenomenon (systemd 252):
$ systemctl status ctrl-alt-del.target
○ reboot.target - System Reboot
Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/reboot.target; disabled; preset:
enabled)
Active: inactive (dead)