Re: [systemd-devel] Handle device node timeout?

Hi, On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:18:13AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 16.01.24 16:06, Mikko Rapeli (mikko.rap...@linaro.org) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have services which depend on a specific device node. How can I run > > some recovery actions when the default 90s timeout for

Re: [systemd-devel] Issues supporting systems with and without TPM and firmware TPM (was Re: Handle device node timeout?)

Hi, On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:47:52AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fr, 16.02.24 11:28, Mikko Rapeli (mikko.rap...@linaro.org) wrote: > > > Support for fTPM devices is problematic. First, the kernel support must be > > modules > > but loading needs to be specially handled after

Re: [systemd-devel] EXT: Re: What creates a new machine-id ?

Hello, Thanks for pointing that. It highlighted some other aspect of the problem, especially for KVM. Best regards, Patrick Agrain -Message d'origine- De : Lennart Poettering Envoyé : jeudi 8 février 2024 11:57 À : Agrain Patrick Cc : systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Objet : EXT:

Re: [systemd-devel] Issues supporting systems with and without TPM and firmware TPM (was Re: Handle device node timeout?)

Hi, On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:53:14AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 19.02.24 10:36, Mikko Rapeli (mikko.rap...@linaro.org) wrote: > > > > After=dev-tpmrm0.device tee-supplicant@teepriv0.service > > > Wants=dev-tpmrm0.device tee-supplicant@teepriv0.service > > > > I think my problems

Re: [systemd-devel] Issues supporting systems with and without TPM and firmware TPM (was Re: Handle device node timeout?)

Hi, On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 01:54:02PM +0300, Andrei Borzenkov wrote: > On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 11:37 AM Mikko Rapeli wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:28:31AM +0200, Mikko Rapeli wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Following up to my previous question which worked around with > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] Issues supporting systems with and without TPM and firmware TPM (was Re: Handle device node timeout?)

Hi, On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:35:27PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Di, 20.02.24 10:24, Mikko Rapeli (mikko.rap...@linaro.org) wrote: > > > Thanks, I will check this. It sounds like optee needs a similar dependency > > generator. > > > > I wonder how many kernel subsystems/drivers which

Re: [systemd-devel] Issues supporting systems with and without TPM and firmware TPM (was Re: Handle device node timeout?)

On Di, 20.02.24 10:24, Mikko Rapeli (mikko.rap...@linaro.org) wrote: > Thanks, I will check this. It sounds like optee needs a similar dependency > generator. > > I wonder how many kernel subsystems/drivers which need userspace daemons > would need systemd side dependency generators. Is it only

[systemd-devel] How to show cylon animation on purpose?

Hi list, Is it possible to create a startup service which triggers cylon animation? I see that the animation is related to running jobs. Sometimes I see it when shutting down. I'm curious if it can be triggered on purpose. Thanks.