On Jun 17, 2016 11:11, "Brian Kroth" <bpkr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com> 2016-06-17 08:00:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Brian Kroth <bpkr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi, I'm trying to convert an
Hi, I'm trying to convert an old school inetd service into a systemd
socket activation.
More or less what was describe in [1] worked for me. However, the bit
I'm currently missing is connection logging.
With the openbsd-inetd package (Debian), one could enable libwrap style
logging with
Hi again, related to my inetd conversion example, in my .service unit I
have something like this:
# nagios-nrpe-server@.service:
[Service]
Environment=NICENESS=0
EnvironmentFile=-/etc/default/nagios-nrpe-server
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/nrpe -i $DAEMON_OPTIONS
Nice=$NICENESS
#
Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com> 2016-06-17 07:47:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:01 AM, Brian Kroth <bpkr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi again, related to my inetd conversion example, in my .service unit I
have something like this:
# nagios-nrpe-server@.service:
[Service]
Environmen
Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com> 2016-06-17 08:00:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Brian Kroth <bpkr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to convert an old school inetd service into a systemd
socket activation.
More or less what was describe in [1] worked for me. However,
Brian Kroth <bpkr...@gmail.com> 2016-06-22 13:48:
On Jun 17, 2016 11:11, "Brian Kroth" <bpkr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Mantas Mikulėnas <graw...@gmail.com> 2016-06-17 08:00:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:05 AM, Brian Kroth <bpkr...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi, I'm try
Hi again all,
TL;DR: would it be possible (or make sense) to have systemd Match rules for
network units that could match on some artifact of the network the link is
attached to like vlan tag, router advertisement, wireless access point or
gateway mac, etc.?
So, the original motivation for this
Hi all, I'm in the midst of steeping myself in systemd docs as I prepare to
face lift a slew of services for Debian Jessie updates.
As I read through things I'm starting to think through a number of new ways
I could potentially reorganize some of our services, which is cool. With my
ideas though
Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> 2016-05-11 19:31:
On Wed, 11.05.16 11:32, Brian Kroth (bpkr...@gmail.com) wrote:
Hi again all,
TL;DR: would it be possible (or make sense) to have systemd Match rules for
network units that could match on some artifact of the network th
On May 11, 2016 12:07, "Lennart Poettering" <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11.05.16 11:27, Brian Kroth (bpkr...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi all, I'm in the midst of steeping myself in systemd docs as I
prepare to
> > face lift a slew of services fo
Terry Burton 2016-05-16 17:43:
On 13 May 2016 at 00:04, Terry Burton wrote:
I have a process (ISC DHCP) that has no reload or soft restart
mechanism. The only way to "reload" it is a stop and start.
I understand systemd's design choice of
How about /etc/default/grub.d/ for the kernel parameter drop in file.
That's how I do it at least.
I don't think it's super well documented tho and I forget the suffix it
expects offhand (*.cfg?). Follow the chain of the update-grub scripts and
you should find it.
Cheers,
Brian
On Fri, Jan 20,
Umut Tezduyar Lindskog 2016-09-12 07:19:
Hi Michael,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
Hi
I wonder why we have the following aliases/symlinks
dbus-org.freedesktop.hostname1.service -> systemd-hostnamed.service
I asked about something similar to this a while back. I think the answer
was that variable expansion only works in the Exec* directives.
Cheers,
Brian
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, 03:26 Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> I have CPUAffinity inside service file and want to configure it via
>
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016, 07:02 Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 29.10.2016 um 13:37 schrieb Antoine Martin:
> > Just like "screen" or "tmux", we want to ensure that some xpra sessions
> > (aka "screen for X11", VNC-like but seamless) can survive when the user
> > logs out
>
>
I think there's been some recent discussion related to this on this mailing
list. You might want to check the archives and/or look into the nofail
and/or noauto options in your fstab entries. Seems like nofail at least
will change the local-fs.target dependency into a Want instead of a
Require,
Seems really dependent upon the container layout as to what's the most
appropriate way of doing that. For instance, if the underlying fs of the
source container is something like btrfs or zfs you could imagine doing a
send/recv of a golden snapshot. Possibly also for an lvm volume/snapshot.
For
In that case, you could also just do something like this:
# for i in {u,s,b}; do echo $i > /proc/sysrq-trigger; done
For "Remount read-only, Sync, (re)Boot". There are also hotkey sequences
to do that (the modern equivalent of the three fingered salute) which might
be more appropriate in the case
18 matches
Mail list logo