Re: [systemd-devel] dependent services status

2022-11-21 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 17.11.22 08:52, Ted Toth (txt...@gmail.com) wrote: > I have a set of services that depend on each other however when > services are started and considered 'active' that does not necessarily > mean they are in a state that a dependent service requires them to be > in to operate properly

Re: [systemd-devel] dependent services status

2022-11-19 Thread Ted Toth
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 5:33 PM Barry wrote: > > > > > On 17 Nov 2022, at 20:03, Ted Toth wrote: > > > > The comment about inotify was just an example, I understand that there > > is a 'notify' service type but I'm not using it because of its > > documented shortcomings. > > I thought using

Re: [systemd-devel] dependent services status

2022-11-18 Thread Barry
> On 17 Nov 2022, at 20:03, Ted Toth wrote: > > The comment about inotify was just an example, I understand that there > is a 'notify' service type but I'm not using it because of its > documented shortcomings. I thought using sd_notify would be all advantages. Service gets to set its state

Re: [systemd-devel] dependent services status

2022-11-17 Thread Ted Toth
The comment about inotify was just an example, I understand that there is a 'notify' service type but I'm not using it because of its documented shortcomings. On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 11:34 AM Alvin Šipraga wrote: > > Hi Ted, > > On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 08:52:00AM -0600, Ted Toth wrote: > > I

Re: [systemd-devel] dependent services status

2022-11-17 Thread Alvin Šipraga
Hi Ted, On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 08:52:00AM -0600, Ted Toth wrote: > I have a set of services that depend on each other however when > services are started and considered 'active' that does not necessarily > mean they are in a state that a dependent service requires them to be > in to operate

Re: [systemd-devel] dependent services status

2022-11-17 Thread Brian Reichert
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 08:52:00AM -0600, Ted Toth wrote: > I have a set of services that depend on each other however when > services are started and considered 'active' that does not necessarily > mean they are in a state that a dependent service requires them to be > in to operate properly (for

[systemd-devel] dependent services status

2022-11-17 Thread Ted Toth
I have a set of services that depend on each other however when services are started and considered 'active' that does not necessarily mean they are in a state that a dependent service requires them to be in to operate properly (for example an inotify watch has been established). systemd services,