Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ima: Have IMA policy loaded from /etc/sysconfig or /etc/default.

2016-11-29 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 29.11.16 07:08, Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > > > Fedora has its policy in /etc/sysconfig/ima-policy while Ubuntu > > > has it in /etc/default/ima-policy. So we try to read the IMA policy > > > from one location and try it from another location if it couldn't > > >

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ima: Have IMA policy loaded from /etc/sysconfig or /etc/default.

2016-11-29 Thread Stefan Berger
On 11/29/2016 06:49 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 28.11.16 14:17, Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: From: Stefan Berger Fedora has its policy in /etc/sysconfig/ima-policy while Ubuntu has it in /etc/default/ima-policy. So we try to read the IMA

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ima: Have IMA policy loaded from /etc/sysconfig or /etc/default.

2016-11-29 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 28.11.16 14:17, Stefan Berger (stef...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > From: Stefan Berger > > Fedora has its policy in /etc/sysconfig/ima-policy while Ubuntu > has it in /etc/default/ima-policy. So we try to read the IMA policy > from one location and try it from

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] ima: Have IMA policy loaded from /etc/sysconfig or /etc/default.

2016-11-28 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 02:17:19PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote: > From: Stefan Berger > > Fedora has its policy in /etc/sysconfig/ima-policy while Ubuntu > has it in /etc/default/ima-policy. So we try to read the IMA policy > from one location and try it from another location