Re: Re: t-and-f: Masters records for 200, 400, 800, mile

2000-11-02 Thread WMurphy25
In a message dated 11/1/0 9:53:23 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: These Masters records are quite "soft". With the exception of the 200m, the 400, 800, 1500, and mile are all within his range. If I'm not mistaken, doesn't he have the 800m already? Soft? You've got to be kidding! Ask Eamonn

t-and-f: Masters chair interviews all posted

2000-11-02 Thread TrackCEO
Greetings, all: All four candidates for USATF Masters TF Committee chairman have responded to my e-mail questionnaire and all four interviews are now posted at: http://www.masterstrack.com/USATFpage.html The last two are from George Mathews and Scott Thornsley. Earlier, I posted interviews

t-and-f: Santiago de Chile - points classifications ?

2000-11-02 Thread Zbigniew Jonik
Hello, I am looking points classifications of Santiago de Chile and splits 4x400 OG Sydney. Best regards Zbigniew Jonik (ATFS) ul. Gogowska 18/4 41-809 Zabrze, Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: t-and-f: Masters records for 200, 400, 800, mile

2000-11-02 Thread Buck Jones
I can't see Gray getting any of the records outside the 800 - and that one only if he generates the will to do so - something that was missing from last summers efforts. Imagine a typical 800m runner (ie someone whose BEST event is the 800, ie Gray) whose best is 1:51 (Gray as of now). How many

Re: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping

2000-11-02 Thread Buck Jones
You are reading too much into what he is saying, I believe. Because RC hasn't seen the evidence, *RC* doesn't believe it exists. Same stance I take, actually. I refuse to approach the discussion already assuming that most runners are doped. While I accept doping occurs, nothing I have

t-and-f: Historic Names

2000-11-02 Thread Ed Grant
Netters: The Union County (NJ) cross-country meet yesterday may not have been the strongest of its kind in the nation this fall, but the boys'; race may have set a record for historic names in the top 10. They included: (Mike) Nison, Scotch Plains 3rd; (KC) Brown, Cranford 44th' (David)

Re: t-and-f: Masters records for 200, 400, 800, mile

2000-11-02 Thread Adam G Beaver
Buck Jones wrote: Imagine a typical 800m runner (ie someone whose BEST event is the 800, ie Gray) whose best is 1:51 (Gray as of now). How many 1:51 half-milers do you know that can run 47.87 or 3:44/4:02? Three points: 1) The fact that Gray ran around 1:50 last season does NOT make him equal

t-and-f: Gray and the record book

2000-11-02 Thread Ed Grant
Netters: I would imagiane there will be a special race somewhere this winter, possibly at the NY Armory, to give Johnny Gray his best shot at the 800M master's mark. As far as the other's go, I would have to agree they are long shots at this point. I am surprise that my good friend

RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping

2000-11-02 Thread Mcewen, Brian T
So, Drew, based on the below progression of the WR (roughly 60 seconds every 20 years) how long before man breaks 00:00.00? In my lifetime, will we see a 23:30 10k? Good one. If I have riled you up, that is tough for you. Keep the putdowns to yourself, or send them to me only. I haven't

Re: t-and-f: Masters records for 200, 400, 800, mile

2000-11-02 Thread R.T.
Watching three of his 800 races this summer, he went out quite fast- 51ish, and the last 150 meters when he realized he was 'out of it', he just jogged the final straightaway. He was trying to be competitive with a 1:45. Jogging the final straightaway, he finished around 1:51. That tells me that

t-and-f: No NYC Marathon TV coverage????

2000-11-02 Thread DLTFNedit
Am I to understand that the NYC Marathon won't be on TV this year? Bummer. After being dumped by ABC a while back it's at least been on ESPN 2 the last couple of years. Does anyone know if it'll be on local NYC TV? The Chicago Marathon coverage on Fox wasn't bad. IMHO they should have had

t-and-f: PV TV?

2000-11-02 Thread CHRIS KUYKENDALL
The U.S. for the time being, in the pole vault, has two Olympic gold medalists and one Olympic silver medalist. It's a growing women's event and is gymnastics-like but with more objective, easy-to-understand scoring than the uneven bars or whatnot. So, a question: Is this winter's indoor

RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping

2000-11-02 Thread Dave Carey
When linear extrapolation is extended over large ranges the choice of dependent variable becomes important. In the case of running records, plotting race time vs calendar time eventually produces meaningless results as witness below. It is better to take average speed as the dependent

t-and-f: PV UIL

2000-11-02 Thread CHRIS KUYKENDALL
A second pole vault question... What's the status of the girls' high school pole vault issue in Texas? Apparently the University Interscholastic League (UIL) on October 15 in Austin had its (third?) annuall discussion on the topic. I gather...

Re: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping

2000-11-02 Thread R.T.
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000 12:25:20 -0600, you wrote: When linear extrapolation is extended over large ranges the choice of dependent variable becomes important. In the case of running records, plotting race time vs calendar time eventually produces meaningless results as witness below. It is

Re: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping

2000-11-02 Thread Conway
Justin wrote: Oh come on Brian, at least try to debate intelligently. Of course it's true that no race can be run in zero time. Limits are above zero time, we can all agree on that. Clearly, as we reach the point of maximum potential, we will see diminishing returns. As was elegantly shown

RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping

2000-11-02 Thread Mcewen, Brian T
Justin says: When we can show that the record is improving by a smaller margin with each succeeding 20 yr period, we'll be able to make some intelligent predictions (rather than simple assertions, which is all you've managed so far). You can make the WR's say whatever you want them too ... if

RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping

2000-11-02 Thread P.F.Talbot
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Richard McCann wrote: You only make my point here. There are virtually NO well-organized, effective institutions in those countries (several of my former ag econ classmates have worked on development projects in Kenya and other African nations). To create the wave of

t-and-f: Need contact phone number for Speed Dynamics

2000-11-02 Thread Kevin Galbraith
Hello Track Net Folks: I need a contact phone number for Speed Dynamics. Can someone help me off list? Kevin Galbraith Long Beach State

t-and-f: World Road Racing Rankings

2000-11-02 Thread RLamppa514
World Road Racing Rankings Updated Who's #1 on the roads? Khannouchi? Kimani? Kiplagat? Ndereba? For the latest World Road Racing Rankings go to the website: http://www.runningusa.org. To-date between January 1 and October 30, there have been a total of 721 performances by men at the 28:40

Re: t-and-f: No NYC Marathon TV coverage????

2000-11-02 Thread David Monti
At 01:10 PM 11/02/2000 EST, you wrote: Am I to understand that the NYC Marathon won't be on TV this year? This is wrong. It WILL be on TV this year. The full race will be shown locally on WNBC in New York, and there will be a national 1 hour highlight show on Sunday afternoon on NBC at 3:00

RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping

2000-11-02 Thread malmo
To create the wave of performances at such young ages, before these athletes have traveled to Europe where they might gain access to EPO, would require a concerted effort by a well-organized institution. Unless Nike or Fila is making such an investment, (and I suspect shareholders would

t-and-f: YES ALL ELITE ARE ON DRUGS

2000-11-02 Thread mantis1
The question is Do you have to take the drugs to be an elite athlete? Hell yes. -Original Message- From: Mcewen, Brian T [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thursday, November 02, 2000 4:08 PM Subject: RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping The "16-17 year

Re: t-and-f: knowing for a fact

2000-11-02 Thread Richard McCann
Brian McEwen replied to Sideshow Bob saying: I'm not going to add much to David Honnea's excellent respone on this, except on a couple of points: Man has not evolved enough to lap the greatest runners of just 15 years before. Training methods have not changed and it doesn't have

RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping

2000-11-02 Thread Richard McCann
At 12:57 PM 11/2/2000 -0700, P.F.Talbot wrote: On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Richard McCann wrote: You only make my point here. There are virtually NO well-organized, effective institutions in those countries (several of my former ag econ classmates have worked on development projects in Kenya and

Re: t-and-f: No NYC Marathon TV coverage????

2000-11-02 Thread WMurphy25
In a message dated 11/2/0 1:27:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am I to understand that the NYC Marathon won't be on TV this year? Bummer. After being dumped by ABC a while back it's at least been on ESPN 2 the last couple of years. Does anyone know if it'll be on local NYC TV? It will be

RE: t-and-f: YES ALL ELITE ARE ON DRUGS

2000-11-02 Thread Ben Hall
That is an idiotic statement. I will bet every cent that I have and ever will have that Derrick Adkins, the 1996 Olympic Gold Medallist in the 400m Hurdles, has never taken performance enhancing drugs. Was he elite? YES Did he take drugs? NO Therefore- YOU'RE WRONG -Original Message-

RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping

2000-11-02 Thread malmo
It used to be that the KAA sent to Junior competitions (and World Univ. games) what appeared to be high school kids...AND they ran like high school kids. Now their "Junior" teams all look 25 years old...AND they run like it. malmo -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping

2000-11-02 Thread malmo
Dismiss everything that you don't know as a "conspiracy theory". There are many more Willie Browns out there. malmo -Original Message- From: Richard McCann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 1:44 PM To: malmo Cc: TFMail List Subject: RE: t-and-f: Not

Re: t-and-f: YES ALL ELITE ARE ON DRUGS

2000-11-02 Thread WMurphy25
Before everyone goes nuts responding to yet another mindless post, might I suggest that we all just ignore it. I can't believe the energy and time wasted by members of this list(myself included) on people, especially those who won't identify themselves, who make these ridiculous statements.

Re: t-and-f: YES ALL ELITE ARE ON DRUGS

2000-11-02 Thread WMurphy25
Before everyone goes nuts responding to yet another mindless post, might I suggest that we all just ignore it. I can't believe the energy and time wasted by members of this list(myself included) on people, especially those who won't identify themselves, who make these ridiculous statements. If

Re: t-and-f: YES ALL ELITE ARE ON DRUGS

2000-11-02 Thread Subfour359
We can accept Jim Ryun running what, 3:51 for a mile as a junior some 35 years ago with nothing but admiration and respect, but 27:40 and 12:54 today are considered absolutely impossible unless they are on some drugs?!?!?!?!?!?!??!!??! This seem like a ridiculus double-standard to anyone

t-and-f: Anyone know of a good stopwatch?

2000-11-02 Thread Dan Kaplan
Just curious if anyone knows of any kick-butt stop watches; preferably something that can time two or three things simultaneously (as opposed to multiple split/lap times). I envision a three part display with the ability to jump from one to the next to start/stop the individual times. Anything

Re: t-and-f: YES ALL ELITE ARE ON DRUGS

2000-11-02 Thread mmrohl
Netters Ben Hall writes: In response too mantis: That is an idiotic statement. Mantis wrote: The question is Do you have to take the drugs to be an elite athlete? You would think that some people might learn... but Ben Hall Came to the same conclusion I already have... My wife is

t-and-f: Mea Culpa

2000-11-02 Thread WMurphy25
Sorry about the multiple messagesdidn't think the message got through, so I kept hitting send. Walt Murphy

Re: t-and-f: Anyone know of a good stopwatch?

2000-11-02 Thread Aferr48
Dan, If you have a Palm III or one of its "family" (PDA running Palm OS) there's a great stopwatch program called Stop3Watch. It as 3 stopwatches displayed, each with the ability to take and remember 100 splits. You can "zoom" in on any watch to increase the display size. You can start all

Re: t-and-f: YES ALL ELITE ARE ON DRUGS

2000-11-02 Thread Roger Ruth
I've just received five copies of a message sent under this subject line. I'll reprint it below, just in case anyone was fortunate enough to miss it. It is not clear to me why subscribers to this list ([EMAIL PROTECTED] edu) would receive mail addressed to [EMAIL PROTECTED]. It is even less

Re: t-and-f: YES ALL ELITE ARE ON DRUGS

2000-11-02 Thread Dgs1170
It really does not hurt that bad to think sometimes! Bold letters, and easy accusations, do not a genius make. The G.O.A.T.

RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping

2000-11-02 Thread malmo
I am thinking quite clearly. It makes no sense for a profit-motivated firm based that derives most of its earnings from sales in the US and Europe to devote resources in a two nations with per capita income for less than $500 per year and little potential growth in consumer demand. If

RE: t-and-f: Not EVERYONE is doping

2000-11-02 Thread Justin Clouder
Oh come on Brian, at least try to debate intelligently. Of course it's true that no race can be run in zero time. Limits are above zero time, we can all agree on that. Clearly, as we reach the point of maximum potential, we will see diminishing returns. As was elegantly shown to us all, there