A couple obvious answers:
1) Football is expensive. Lots of equipment, large rosters, high insurance
costs, etc. Not many schools will foot that bill without the possibility of
offsetting revenue. Add in the cost of needing duplicate football facilities
for men and women. Doesn't seem
http://www.womenboxing.com/mueller.htm
Joshua Seeherman wrote:
Villanova had some serious Tuppeny Magic in the DMR when an injury to a
Stanford athlete left the field wide open, and anchor man Adrian Blincoe
raced to a 3:58.4 split in the 1600
The injury to the Stanford athlete in the DMR was pretty memorable. Stanford was well
Kebba,
Let me make sure I have this correct.
1) You are trying to promote a track meet in the U.S.
2) You know that U.S. people get excited about a certain class (those who make the
finals in major meets) of distance athletes.
3) There are members of that class of athletes entered in the
FWIW, Alan Webb receives more ink in the Washington Post than any other individual
athlete, on any level. Saturday's article comprised about 1/5 of page 1 (front page,
not sports page) and the entirety of page 4, a total of about 55 column inches of text
and 5 photos. Interesting tidbits
FWIW, Alan Webb receives more ink in the Washington Post than any other individual
athlete, on
any level. Saturday's article comprised about 1/5 of page 1 (front page, not sports
page) and
the entirety of page 4, a total of about 55 column inches of text and 5 photos.
Interesting
tidbits
I apologize in advance for responding to such an obvious troll, but ...
SD Cap'n wrote:
I wonder if the U of Oregon would be interested in knowing that its servers
are being used to distribute porn.
First, the message in question did NOT distribute anything except a sequence of
letters
I am deeply, deeply offended by this.
You have to join to see the photos.
Please, if you're going to post such URLs, ensure that they are not
members-only sights, I mean sites.
Naked Don (no photos available at this time)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was
told by a friend that Rios has a pictorial
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2:08 was always a soft time for a world best.
Huh?!?
It has never surprised me that
it is now commonplace
It is?
and second rate.
WHAT?!?
News flash - even in the year 2001, 2:08 is pretty flinkin' fast, and not terribly
common.
Clayton did it, legit, MHO
I do realize that 2:08 has been bettered ~50 times, so I guess it depends on your
concept of "common." My definition of "common" means not quite world class. If you
can run 2:08, you're a world class marathoner and can race with anyone.
Donald Mcfarlin wrote:
News flas
Do Hash House Harriers count? Lots of them!
Don
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/4/01 11:41:07 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ps--does anybody but a an over-40 sportswriter actually use the term
"thinclad"
anymore?
How about "harrier"? If it wasn't for Marc Bloom, I
Ha ha ha ha ha. If sprints got equal time with distance races on
TV, they would get a huge CUT in coverage. Be careful what you ask
for.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well...we
all know that this is not on the elite level...but..i did not hear
any of you distance
freaks mention that maybe the longer
12 matches
Mail list logo