-Original Message-
From: P.F.Talbot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 11:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: t-and-f: Temperature and performance
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
It isn't always cool in Boulder. The last couple Bolder Boulder's have been
in the upper 80's to mid 90's during the elite races. It is pretty dry
though.
As for pressure changes, the biggest swings I've seen in the last couple
years (I bought one of those fancy watches that show the altitude
Temperature and humidity would seem to be more appropriate than temperature and barometric pressure. NYCM had a formula in place for Sunday's race where the standards for time incentives would be eased if both the temperature and humidity were at or above predetermined levels when the winner
Generally high pressure brings low humidity. Low pressure high humidity.
It's the same thing.
malmo
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Tuesday, November 07, 2000 4:07
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
In a message dated Mon, 6 Nov 2000 9:47:27 PM Eastern Standard Time, Benji
Durden [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No - it isn't me this time. Bolder Boulder is offering time bonuses this
coming year and want some semi-rational way to decide when to adjust the $$
due to temperature.
bd
--
Benji
On Mon, 6 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are they going to have a sliding scale based on barometric pressure as well?
Wasn't it '95 when a huge high pressure system moved in and basically made
the conditions in Boulder equal to a sea-level race? I believe Josephat
Machuka, who was on fire
