One problem with this thesis: you assume that if ones talent is slow to
emerge except with hard training equates with not being at the top of the
talent scale. That's a huge assumption, not testable, and therefore
specious. The very definition of talent is that it is there. I believe you
confuse
Interesting Jon. I'll give you one thing, you sure do make people think and
bring up interesting conversations. You bring up something interesting. Just
how testable is talent/genetics? If a high school runner runs extremely well
off of limited training (Kennedy) one would assume that runner
On 5/26/01 7:08 PM, alan tobin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting Jon. I'll give you one thing, you sure do make people think and
bring up interesting conversations. You bring up something interesting. Just
how testable is talent/genetics? If a high school runner runs extremely well
off of
