On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net wrote:
Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com writes:
Also, incline=* is still mathematically valid for nodes to indicate
the instantaneous incline at that point, so I don't see a problem with
that.
The problem with nodes is
Hi,
Matthias Julius wrote:
The problem with nodes is that you can't tell to which way the incline
applies when there is more than one connecting to the node.
Unless there are exactly two, of which one ends and the other begins at
the node. In Germany, less than 2% of highway=incline nodes are
John Smith wrote:
2009/12/28 Roy Wallace
waldo000...@gmail.com:
Is it? Can you explain why? Conceptually, all you need is layer=* and
the ability to detect the overlap of the building=yes area and the
highway=* way. But I guess you're saying this is hard to encode with
render rules?
This may
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:18 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
but it still is strange to tag a node with a tag the meaning of
which depends on a way, isn't it?
Or more precisely, depends on a direction.
___
Tagging mailing list
2009/12/29 Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com:
As far as rendering is concerned, neither layering nor covered is properly
rendered at this time on any of the renders that I'm aware of.
Did you file a request for enhancement against mapnik for covered?
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.netwrote:
Are there any other official node tags that depend on a parent way to
be fully defined?
Barrier=entrance et. al. spring to mind.
___
Tagging mailing list
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net wrote:
... I would like to add a note to the 'highway=incline|incline_steep'
tags on Map Features saying that they discouraged in favor of
'incline=*'. I think there should not be redundant tagging schemes in
Map
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:38 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.netwrote:
Are there any other official node tags that depend on a parent way to
be fully defined?
Barrier=entrance et. al. spring to mind.
Also
Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net
wrote:
I would also add the values 'up_steep' and 'down_steep'
to 'incline=*' for this to be a equivalent replacement of the highway
tags.
-1. This is like having width=wide -
Matthias Julius wrote:
Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net
wrote:
I would also add the values 'up_steep' and 'down_steep'
to 'incline=*' for this to be a equivalent replacement of the highway
tags.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:49 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net
wrote:
Are there any other official node tags that depend on a parent way to
be fully defined?
...
However, none of them, as far as I know, depend on the
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net wrote:
'up/down' is in there to be able to tag an incline where the exact value
is not known. Adding '_steep' would allow to differentiate a little.
Of course, what is steep and what is not is subjective - just like
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Isn't the up/down dependent on the direction of travel?
Yup.
With most roads
being mapped as a single way would make it ambiguous.
No. The value of incline=* refers to the direction of the way (the
way direction being
Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net
wrote:
'up/down' is in there to be able to tag an incline where the exact value
is not known. Adding '_steep' would allow to differentiate a little.
Of course, what is steep
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.netwrote:
Of course, everyone can tag what he wants anyway. The question is what
we want to encourage.
This is like saying Anyone can drive at whatever speed he wants, the
question is what we want to encourage. - ie, true, but
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.netwrote:
Of course, everyone can tag what he wants anyway. The question is what
we want to encourage.
This is like saying Anyone can drive at whatever speed he wants, the
question
16 matches
Mail list logo
