Re: [Tagging] covered definition in the wiki

2010-07-20 Thread Richard Mann
Layers don't work when there are area/way conflicts, because the norm for rendering is to draw areas first then ways on top. So you have to have a flag that says this way isn't really on top. We have a perfectly adequate flag for this function (tunnel=yes), but people objected to using that for

Re: [Tagging] covered definition in the wiki

2010-07-20 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/7/20 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com: Layers don't work when there are area/way conflicts, because the norm for rendering is to draw areas first then ways on top. So you have to have a flag that says this way isn't really on top. We have a perfectly adequate flag for

Re: [Tagging] covered definition in the wiki

2010-07-20 Thread John Smith
On 20 July 2010 19:11, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: exactly, there is a lot of application cases and I don't see why our definition should be so arbitrarily restrictive. It's probably only limited because people didn't think of any other uses...

Re: [Tagging] covered definition in the wiki

2010-07-20 Thread Richard Mann
How would you like it rendered? Covered-as-in-a-shopping-mall is quite different to covered-as-in-protected-from-the-rain. The real problem is that it's scope is too broad. Richard On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 10:11 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2010/7/20 Richard Mann

Re: [Tagging] covered definition in the wiki

2010-07-20 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/7/20 John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com: On 20 July 2010 19:11, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: exactly, there is a lot of application cases and I don't see why our definition should be so arbitrarily restrictive. It's probably only limited because people didn't think

Re: [Tagging] covered definition in the wiki

2010-07-20 Thread John Smith
On 20 July 2010 23:32, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: That's also what I thought, and why I put it on this list. Let's change it to a more generic definition and put the examples out of the definition and into an example section, or are there any objections? One use that I'm

Re: [Tagging] covered definition in the wiki

2010-07-20 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/7/20 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com: So something like this: http://www.classiccarports.com/images/galleries/walkways/covered-walkway-2.jpg should be rendered the same way as a tunnel? yes. You would map the roof (building=roof) and the way itself will be rendered