Hi,
Here is a proposal for a new way to tag fire hydrants. It's more precise than
the old amenity=fire_hydrant tag and there is a very active discussion on the
German board: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=762 .
Common hydrants can be tagged in the old way, but new ones should be
Most vineyards have something similar, though not always so heavily
marketed, so I think you need to find a term that's more
international. Perhaps tourism=vineyard_shop or just shop=vineyard.
Richard
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:15 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 July 2010
On 26 July 2010 20:02, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Most vineyards have something similar, though not always so heavily
marketed, so I think you need to find a term that's more
international. Perhaps tourism=vineyard_shop or just shop=vineyard.
You some times can
winery: no such word in en_gb, we just use vineyard for the whole
operation (though of course we don't do these things on the same scale
as Australia). Unless you're going to distinguish between shop=winery
and shop=vineyard, I'd use the more generic term in the tagging
system.
Richard
On 26 July 2010 20:30, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
winery: no such word in en_gb, we just use vineyard for the whole
operation (though of course we don't do these things on the same scale
as Australia). Unless you're going to distinguish between shop=winery
and
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Good idea, or just a local fix?
Richard
Personnally, I think the easiest to fix many issues would be to draw a
specific polygon for the bridge and link it to the roads, cycleways,
railways, etc by a
On 26/07/2010 10:58, Richard Mann wrote:
One of the things Dave Earl mentioned in his talk about rendering was
the gaps-in-casings you sometimes get at bridges.
What I've ended up doing is
1) rendering casings in layer (not underneath everything like Mapnik)
That's what I did also in my
2010/7/26 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Good idea, or just a local fix?
Richard
Personnally, I think the easiest to fix many issues would be to draw a
specific polygon for the bridge and link it to
On 26 July 2010 20:45, Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com wrote:
Personnally, I think the easiest to fix many issues would be to draw a
specific polygon for the bridge and link it to the roads, cycleways,
railways, etc by a relation. I don't know for renderers but it would make
contributors
On 26/07/2010 11:37, Pieren wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com
mailto:richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Good idea, or just a local fix?
Richard
Personnally, I think the easiest to fix many issues would be to draw a
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Richard Mann wrote:
winery: no such word in en_gb, we just use vineyard for the whole
operation (though of course we don't do these things on the same scale
as Australia). Unless you're going to distinguish between shop=winery
and shop=vineyard, I'd use the more generic
On 26/07/2010 11:30, Richard Mann wrote:
winery: no such word in en_gb, we just use vineyard for the whole
operation (though of course we don't do these things on the same scale
as Australia). Unless you're going to distinguish between shop=winery
and shop=vineyard, I'd use the more generic term
Most of these call themselves vineyards
http://www.englishwineproducers.com/scvineyard.htm
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:57 AM, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
can you provide a definition of this use of the word?
___
Tagging mailing list
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:48 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
The problem is as you zoom out so you can see the ways properly the
widths vary, so once you zoom out a few levels you won't even see any
bridge any more, which may be useful for navigating etc..
For such zoom
On 7/26/10 4:20 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 26 July 2010 18:16,technikschlu...@web.de wrote:
Hi,
Here is a proposal for a new way to tag fire hydrants. It's more precise than the old
amenity=fire_hydrant tag and there is a very active discussion on the German
board:
On 26 July 2010 21:20, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
For such zoom levels, the renderer might decide to render like the
traditional bridge=yes. This would be a rendering decision. My concern is
That seems to be overly complicated just to extend the length of the
bridge where it doesn't extend
On 7/26/10 7:18 AM, Dave F. wrote:
On 26/07/2010 11:17, Liz wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jul 2010, Richard Mann wrote:
Most vineyards have something similar, though not always so heavily
marketed, so I think you need to find a term that's more
international. Perhaps tourism=vineyard_shop or just
Am 26.07.2010 12:45, schrieb Peteris Krisjanis:
Draw bridge as physical instance and bind ways to it in relation.
Anyone up to make a proposal feature?
Have a look at:
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels
cu colliar
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
Good idea, or just a local fix?
Richard
Personally, I think the easiest to fix many issues would be to draw a
specific polygon
- Original Message -
From: technikschlu...@web.de
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 9:16 AM
Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Fire_Hydrant
Hi,
Here is a proposal for a new way to tag fire hydrants. It's more precise
than the old
On 26/07/2010 10:58, Richard Mann wrote:
One of the things Dave Earl mentioned in his talk about rendering was
the gaps-in-casings you sometimes get at bridges.
What I've ended up doing is
1) rendering casings in layer (not underneath everything like Mapnik)
2) putting in a flag to identify
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:25 AM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Why *should* newly entered hydrants use this new precise scheme. Voting
hasn't even started on the proposal, it might not get approved, the FRC
start date is today, so it might get changed.
I interpret that statement
Dave F (et al),
Renderers draw roads (typically) by drawing a wide grey line on each
segment, a grey circle at each node, then a narrower (say) white line
on each segment, and a white circle at each node. All you see of the
grey is a thin line on each side of the white line: this is the
casing.
Shouldn't the layer_change be on the common point, not a way? A way
(usually) has two ends, so putting the tag on a way will not indicate at
which end of the way the layer change takes place. But then it
degenerates to two (or more) connected ways with a different layer=*
value, so the layer
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Shouldn't the layer_change be on the common point, not a way? A way
(usually) has two ends, so putting the tag on a way will not indicate at
which end of the way the layer change takes place. But then it degenerates
to
On 26/07/2010 14:07, Richard Mann wrote:
Dave F (et al),
Renderers draw roads (typically) by drawing a wide grey line on each
segment, a grey circle at each node, then a narrower (say) white line
on each segment, and a white circle at each node. All you see of the
grey is a thin line on each
On 26/07/2010 16:19, Richard Mann wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
So your saying to save the renders time, the data collectors have to waste
time adding new tags?
There was me thinking this was a project where we each did a bit for
mutual benefit.
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 26/07/2010 14:07, Richard Mann wrote:
If you draw the
grey in the correct layer, then you get little semi-circular arcs of
grey at the end of bridges (if they are layer=1).
I've never noticed this in Mapnik,or an
On Monday 26 July 2010 17:19:53 Richard Mann wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
So your saying to save the renders time, the data collectors have to
waste time adding new tags?
There was me thinking this was a project where we each did a bit for
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:17 PM, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Yes, but human mapping time is a far more scarce resource then computer
working time. So let the computer fix it. Preprocess!
Computer working time is rarely the limiting resource (otherwise we'd
all have been out of a job long
On Monday 26 July 2010 23:10:49 Richard Mann wrote:
The advantage of creating a tagging scheme is that the complicated
situations get sorted out by humans (who are good at that sort of
thing)
In this case the humans are very bad a it, because they can't read the mind of
every graphic designer
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 26/07/2010 13:35, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Layer is used purely as an aid to the renderer to distinguish where two
or
more ways *cross* each
On 27/07/2010 00:28, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 26/07/2010 13:35, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Layer is used purely as an aid to the renderer to
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 27/07/2010 00:28, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:45 AM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 26/07/2010 13:35, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Dave
34 matches
Mail list logo
