I think there might be more types of public fire control
equipment... I remember often seeing fire beaters (broomstick with
flaps of rubber/leather) in a rack on moor and heathland prone to fires.
Maybe amenity=fire_beater can be added to the proposal?
Colin
On 28/07/2010 02:41, Richard
The right long term solution for this stuff is to use country-specific
tags, (eg, in australia we could use amenity=ses_station or
something), and to centrally define (in machine-readable terms) what
those country-specific tags are. But I think we're a fair way from
being able to implement
For some reason it completely escaped me that service=* is supposed to
be used for both railways (eg, service=spur) and roads
(service=alley). I don't really want to debate this situation with a
view to changing it, but could someone give me a quick explanation on
how this arose? It seems a little
On 28 July 2010 17:25, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
For some reason it completely escaped me that service=* is supposed to
be used for both railways (eg, service=spur) and roads
(service=alley). I don't really want to debate this situation with a
view to changing it, but could
At 2010-07-27 23:25, Colin Smale wrote:
I think there might be more types of public fire control equipment...
I remember often seeing fire beaters (broomstick with flaps of
rubber/leather) in a rack on moor and heathland prone to fires. Maybe
amenity=fire_beater can be added to the proposal?
On 28 July 2010 17:50, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
There are also fire hoses which are attached to building water supplies and
fan-folded inside largish glass-front metal cases inset into walls.
emergency=fire_hose maybe, though I'd like something that better indicates
that
On 28/07/2010, at 1:13 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I think that there is definitely space for a bridge-relation to deal with all
these informations and bring them together. An alternative might be to
draw an (additional) polygon for the bridge area in projection (with
common nodes on the
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:27 AM, James Livingston
li...@sunsetutopia.com wrote:
Someone mentioned
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Bridges_and_Tunnels
up-thread, is there anything it doesn't cover? I've been using it for over a
year, although I haven't mapped any
Am 28.07.2010 13:02, schrieb John F. Eldredge:
I agree that tagging such things as emergency would make more sense than
tagging them as amenity.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] emergency=*
From :mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com
Date :Wed Jul 28 02:09:41 America/Chicago 2010
Did I miss anything currently being mentioned in this or the fire
hydrant thread?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Emergency
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 7/28/10 8:45 AM, John Smith wrote:
Did I miss anything currently being mentioned in this or the fire
hydrant thread?
the fire hydrant language is overly specific; out here in the
sticks, we have what are called dry hydrants adjacent
to ponds (there's a photo of an example associated with
On 28 July 2010 23:45, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
the fire hydrant language is overly specific; out here in the
CP from wikipedia... and there is always the little edit button/links
to help improve it :)
___
Tagging mailing list
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Emergency
Are these tags approved?
Also i was surprised to see office tags.
I haven't ever seen these tags.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Office
___
Tagging mailing list
On 28 July 2010 23:57, S.Higashi s_hig...@mua.biglobe.ne.jp wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Emergency
Are these tags approved?
Check out some of the comments on the minor tag proposals lately when
it comes to voting, most just suggest you use it if it seems sensible
and
On 28/07/2010 15:09, S.Higashi wrote:
I'm confused because I was thinking that tags on Map_Features page
were all approved tags..
There is no such thing as an approved tag.
David
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 29 July 2010 01:14, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, that's the bit I found odd. I guess there are other examples of
a tag meaning two different things depending on what the main tag is
(eg, voltage=* can go with power=line, or railway=rail,
electrified=yes). I'm sure soon
I'm confused because I was thinking that tags on Map_Features page
were all approved tags..
Sometimes even approved tags are not useful. I tagged a large number of
approved contact:phone= , but found that OSM map data consumers I looked at
all used the *disapproved* tag phone=. Tagwatch
On 29 July 2010 01:19, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
- Should I just put a redirect to office= on the proposal pages?
Up to you, alternatively you can just copy and paste bits of
content/text that would be useful...
___
Tagging mailing list
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 1:16 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
electrified=yes). I'm sure soon enough we'll have a major collision,
so to speak...
you mean like power=station/generator etc?
No. From a technical standpoint, there's actually not a problem there,
it's technically a
2010/7/28 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
The relation's scope goes beyond parallel dual-carriage ways.
+1, and I don't see why we shouldn't have it. They will be less
complicated for following mappers than routes are for instance.
Suppose
there's a parking on top of the bridge, or
At 2010-07-28 01:49, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 3:50 AM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
There are also fire hoses which are attached to building water supplies and
fan-folded inside largish glass-front metal cases inset into walls.
emergency=fire_hose
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 5:23 PM, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.comwrote:
There is no process.
That's simply not true and you know it. It's a big difference between there
is no process and I don't want to follow a process.
Pieren
___
Tagging
On 29 July 2010 15:13, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
5-10k mappers doesn't work, but skipping discussion and inventing tags
Don't confuse discussion with voting, voting is flawed and many things
are still discussed on the tagging list before being documented on the
wiki.
based on
John Smith wrote:
On 29 July 2010 15:13, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
5-10k mappers doesn't work, but skipping discussion and inventing tags
Don't confuse discussion with voting, voting is flawed and many things
are still discussed on the tagging list before being documented on
24 matches
Mail list logo
