On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Sebastian Klein
basti...@googlemail.com wrote:
from what I understand, landuse is to mark a larger area that has multiple
I think it's useful to differentiate/subdivide areas where there are
noticeable changes in landuse: don't be too enthusiastic about lumping
2010/8/15 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Sebastian Klein
basti...@googlemail.com wrote:
from what I understand, landuse is to mark a larger area that has multiple
I think it's useful to differentiate/subdivide areas where there are
2010/8/10 Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net:
After discussing this a while ago on the list, I'm also using other
source:x / source_ref:x pairs for various keys x:
maxspeed
maxspeed:children_present
maxspeed:hgv
maxweight
maxheight
bicycle
cycleway
lanes
for source:maxspeed there
On 15/08/2010 10:58, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
For city centres with mixed use I proposed once
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/centre_zone
but actually I think now that it might be better to have landuse=mixed
for mixed landuses (especially if the mix is within the same
On 15 August 2010 21:56, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I thought the accepted way was to separate the different uses with a
semi-colon:
landuse=residential;commercial etc.
Does anything actually parse multiple values like that?
___
Tagging
On Sunday 15 August 2010 14:28:15 John Smith wrote:
On 15 August 2010 21:56, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I thought the accepted way was to separate the different uses with a
semi-colon:
landuse=residential;commercial etc.
Does anything actually parse multiple values like that?
On 16 August 2010 01:43, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sunday 15 August 2010 14:28:15 John Smith wrote:
On 15 August 2010 21:56, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I thought the accepted way was to separate the different uses with a
semi-colon:
landuse=residential;commercial
On 16 August 2010 01:43, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
With landuse=mixed you basically know nothing, except that there should be
multiple values. You don't even know if it is a build-up area as there are
enough landuse values that deal with the countryside.
+1 I don't think landuse=mixed
2010/8/15 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl:
With landuse=mixed you basically know nothing, except that there should be
multiple values. You don't even know if it is a build-up area as there are
enough landuse values that deal with the countryside.
IMHO mixed landuse is neither residential or
On 15/08/2010 17:54, John Smith wrote:
On 16 August 2010 01:43, Cartinuscarti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
With landuse=mixed you basically know nothing, except that there should be
multiple values. You don't even know if it is a build-up area as there are
enough landuse values that deal with the
2010/8/15 Vincent Pottier vpott...@gmail.com:
During the preparation of the big import of CLC [1], we have got the two
codes 1.1.1 (Continuous urban fabric) and 1.1.2 (Discontinuous urban
fabric). We have mixed them on the same tag landuse=residential.
didn't you use a subtag for
On 15/08/2010 18:54, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
didn't you use a subtag for continuous/discontinuous? Could have been helpful.
We have put the CLC:code tag in all polygons imported, so it is easy to
find them back.
But no sub tag.
For the polygons are often been modifyed from import, we
I can't speak for other states, but in Florida's Ocala National Forest
the trails, at least the ones you can drive on, are marked with
rectangular brown highway shields, so ref seems appropriate. But you
probably shouldn't leave out all prefixes - for example 43 is a
tertiary road, and with simply
I'm not sure this is the best way to do things, what do others think?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:shopoldid=517645diff=next
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 5:30 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not sure this is the best way to do things, what do others think?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:shopoldid=517645diff=next
Perhaps building=disused (not shop because it's not
On 15/08/2010 22:30, John Smith wrote:
I'm not sure this is the best way to do things, what do others think?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Map_Features:shopoldid=517645diff=next
If its vacant, then its not a shop, so shouldn't be tagged as such.
Otherwise it will
On Sunday, August 15, 2010 01:18:37 pm, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
I can't speak for other states, but in Florida's Ocala National Forest
the trails, at least the ones you can drive on, are marked with
rectangular brown highway shields, so ref seems appropriate. But you
probably shouldn't leave
He wasn’t saying that bicycle=designated is always a sharrow, but that a
sharrow is effectively the same thing as a sign saying “bike route”.
They’re both ways of marking something as a designated route for bicycles.
I don't agree with this. A single isolated road could have a sharrow,
but
On 16 August 2010 15:01, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
He wasn’t saying that bicycle=designated is always a sharrow, but that a
sharrow is effectively the same thing as a sign saying “bike route”.
They’re both ways of marking something as a designated route for bicycles.
I don't agree
19 matches
Mail list logo
