On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:56 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
landuse=institutional would include values like military and cemetery,
This one isn't so good. Landuse=military is perfectly valid, as
military land is really different from other land in lots of respects,
like the
2010/9/27 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features%2FIce_creamaction=historysubmitdiff=532984oldid=531944
This doesn't seem quite right.
Care to expand a bit?
Regards,
Simone
___
Tagging
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:26:27 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_features%2FIce_creamaction=historysubmitdiff=532984oldid=531944
This doesn't seem quite right.
27-18 + 1 abstain, seems an approved to me. Controversial, yes, but approved.
--
On 27/09/2010 01:55, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 8:36 PM, SomeoneElse
li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
Not amenity=social_club? That seems to be in more widespread use...
Why would we use amenity when we have a more specific key (leisure)
that fits perfectly?
Your're
On 27/09/2010 02:55, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 8:36 PM, SomeoneElse
li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
On 26/09/2010 23:35, vclaw wrote:
I have created a proposal for mapping social clubs, by tagging as
leisure=social_club.
See
Hello all:
I've created a proposal (or pre-proposal) in
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:shop#shop.3Dwedding
to tag these kinds of bussiness.
I would like to get comments to it in order to have it approved (or denied) in
a near future
Thanks
Noel
er Envite
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:14:19 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:48 AM, David Paleino
da...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:26:27 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:49 AM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
How would you call then shop=ice_cream, sneaked in the wiki without any
discussion or voting or anything else?
Another bad tag.
On a related note: me and some other people on #osm-it were thinking about
re-organizing the
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Lennard l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 27-9-2010 10:16, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Landuse should be covered by land cover (and buildings) where said
cover exists. For example a landuse=retail area may be over half
amenity=parking areas.
And yet we call
2010/9/27 David Paleino da...@debian.org:
I'd say +1 to retail=food and food=cafe|restaurant|... though.
-1, I wouldn't tag restaurants, cafes and others as retail. I am not
opposing food=cafe / restaurant, etc., this would also be compatible
with the current amenity-tag, but I don't see a big
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 6:05 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/27 David Paleino da...@debian.org:
I'd say +1 to retail=food and food=cafe|restaurant|... though.
-1, I wouldn't tag restaurants, cafes and others as retail.
Why not? They're places where you buy things.
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:15:50 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 6:05 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
In German I would use Gastronomie as main tag for those, but I'm not
sure if gastronomy would be the exact translation in English for
this. My dictionary suggests catering as an
(By the way, nobody seems to have brought up the existence of frozen
yogurt places and whether these fit into the new tag.)
Or Smoothie / Fruit Smoothie -only places.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smoothie
___
Tagging mailing list
On 9/27/10, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:14:19 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
[...]
Almost every one of those approves is by someone living in Italy,
which suggests discussion on the Italian mailing list or other
discussion among a small group in an echo
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 12:23 PM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
Why changing an old and widely used amenity=restaurant+cuisine ? As it
was mentionned many times in the past, discussing new keys is easy when it's
about new features (e.g. craft). But changing old and well established tags
On 9/27/10, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
Why changing an old and widely used amenity=restaurant+cuisine ? [...]
This can be accepted only if it's to clear ambiguities or add
a real value but that's not the case here.
mostly because the current system does not scale, with food+drinks
places
recently there was introduced some weird stuff in bridge:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge
bridge=yes
bridge=aqueduct
bridge=viaduct
bridge=swing
bridge=abandoned
bridge=...
I'm fine with yes, but also aqueduct, viaduct, swing may be OK,
indicating all a
I already proceeded and removed abandoned
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 7:50 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
recently there was introduced some weird stuff in bridge:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:bridge
bridge=yes
bridge=aqueduct
bridge=viaduct
bridge=swing
bridge=abandoned
bridge=...
Hello all:
There are some streets which, being two-way, one way has a Stop or Give Way
and the other has not. How to tag them?
My proposal is splitting the street in two highways with same name, same tags,
etc, each one being one-way and exactly the same nodes, with one of them
having an
2010/9/27 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:48 AM, David Paleino da...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:26:27 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
2010/9/27 Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org:
Hello all:
There are some streets which, being two-way, one way has a Stop or Give Way
and the other has not. How to tag them?
If we consider the verse of the way, then probably a :forward vs.
:backward specification would work. For
On 27/09/2010 10:19, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Lennardl...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 27-9-2010 10:16, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Landuse should be covered by land cover (and buildings) where said
cover exists. For example a landuse=retail area may be over half
2010/9/27 Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org:
Hello all:
There are some streets which, being two-way, one way has a Stop or Give Way
and the other has not. How to tag them?
tag the signs at their position (i.e. in countries driving on the
right, put a node right of the way and tag
On 27/09/2010 13:51, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I agree that this is the same problem. It isn't a good reason to keep
bridge=abandoned IMHO. You could workaround with railway=abandoned,
abandoned=tram, but for bridge the wiki states: bridge=type and
abandoned is clearly not part of a typology
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Noel David Torres Taño
env...@rolamasao.org wrote:
Hello all:
There are some streets which, being two-way, one way has a Stop or Give Way
and the other has not. How to tag them?
My proposal is splitting the street in two highways with same name, same tags,
2010/9/27 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
On 27/09/2010 13:51, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I agree that this is the same problem. It isn't a good reason to keep
bridge=abandoned IMHO. You could workaround with railway=abandoned,
abandoned=tram, but for bridge the wiki states: bridge=type and
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 27/09/2010 10:19, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
But what I'm mostly concerned with is having a limited number of
top-level landuse values. For example a large residential
neighborhood can be tagged landuse=residential, but
I've used landuse in a slightly different way from what you say.
After discussion on the talk-it ML, we agreed that single shops in a
mainly residential block would be added as POIs, but not mapped as
landuse=retail. However, if the shop was a separate building, then the
landuse there would be
On Lunes 27 Septiembre 2010 14:01:58 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer escribió:
2010/9/27 Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org:
Hello all:
There are some streets which, being two-way, one way has a Stop or Give
Way and the other has not. How to tag them?
tag the signs at their position
I would guess that a tourist strip would refer to a group of businesses that
cater mainly to tourists, such as souvenir shops, rather than catering to local
residents. Since the two are sometimes intermingled, my preference would be to
use an area tag such as retail_area, and then map the
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Simone Saviolo
simone.savi...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, in my mapping I've accounted for a possible future landuse=road.
Therefore, any landuse area is smaller than or equal to a block. Also,
as a consequence of this, parkings would be part of the landuse=road,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:37 AM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
I would guess that a tourist strip would refer to a group of businesses
that cater mainly to tourists, such as souvenir shops, rather than catering
to local residents. Since the two are sometimes intermingled, my preference
would
In data lunedì 27 settembre 2010 10:14:19, Nathan Edgars II ha scritto:
And now we have a tag that replaces all ice cream places, thus
providing less information than the former amenity=cafe/fast_food/etc.
cuisine=ice_cream. How is this a good thing?
Ice cream (and related products such as
One issue with tagging a commercial parking lot as landuse=road is that it is
generally legal to use a road as a through route, whereas you can be issued a
traffic ticket for simply cutting across a parking lot without stopping.
Admittedly, this isn't always enforced. In my experience, this
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Luca Brivio luca.bri...@gmail.com wrote:
In data lunedì 27 settembre 2010 10:14:19, Nathan Edgars II ha scritto:
And now we have a tag that replaces all ice cream places, thus
providing less information than the former amenity=cafe/fast_food/etc.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Fast food is simply a style of serving: you go up to the counter and
order. It has nothing to do with the cuisine.
The Italians probably don't like to think of ice-cream as fast food,
because that has connotations of
2010/9/27 j...@jfeldredge.com:
One issue with tagging a commercial parking lot as landuse=road is that it is
generally legal to use a road as a through route, whereas you can be issued a
traffic ticket for simply cutting across a parking lot without stopping.
Admittedly, this isn't always
2010/9/25 Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com:
For some reason, kerosin hasn't been able to post to the mailing list so I'm
sending this out.
We received great input over email and on the talk page for the social
facility proposal so we decided to open it for voting:
So, in Italy, the owner of a private parking lot is not allowed to say that his
parking lot can't be used as a public street? It is common in the USA to see
signs at parking-lot entrances saying no through traffic.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] musings on landuse
From
2010/9/27 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Luca Brivio luca.bri...@gmail.com wrote:
In data lunedì 27 settembre 2010 10:14:19, Nathan Edgars II ha scritto:
And now we have a tag that replaces all ice cream places, thus
providing less information than the
Simone Saviolo:
Fast food, in non-English-speaking countries, in associated with
hamburgers, [...]
Yes, although it's a cultural interpretation (that I share, FWIW).
Actually saying kebab is fast-food is not that wrong, even if it
sounds strange to me and others.
But the main point of
What about abandoned=yes ?
Noel
er Envite
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Why changing an old and widely used amenity=restaurant+cuisine ?
+1
Although I agree that the current amenity=restaurant, fast_food...etc.
is a bit awkward, it is nearly unthinkable that it should be changed because
of the number of people who are already using and rendering the data.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Alessandro Rubini
rubini-l...@gnudd.com wrote:
But the main point of fast-food is fast-meal, and actually people have
lunch in a fast food. But you don't go to a coffee or gelateria to
have lunch, that's the main reason why ice cream places don't qualify
as
2010/9/27 j...@jfeldredge.com:
So, in Italy, the owner of a private parking lot is not allowed to say that
his parking lot can't be used as a public street? It is common in the USA to
see signs at parking-lot entrances saying no through traffic.
I wouldn't say he's not allowed. AFAIK (and
On 27-9-2010 16:25, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
What about abandoned=yes ?
And expect every data consumer to have to parse that in addition to
whatever bridge=* value you leave on the data. What's not there anymore
is just that: not there anymore. It doesn't deserve a bridge=* tag.
On 27/09/2010 01:36, SomeoneElse wrote:
On 26/09/2010 23:35, vclaw wrote:
I have created a proposal for mapping social clubs, by tagging as
leisure=social_club.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/social_club
Not amenity=social_club? That seems to be in more
Well, you presumably would have an intermediate step in which the railway is no
longer being used for train traffic, but the rails and crossties (also known as
sleepers) have not yet been taken up, so it isn't suitable yet for use as a
cycleway.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re:
2010/9/27 Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org:
Hello all:
I've created a proposal (or pre-proposal) in
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:shop#shop.3Dwedding
to tag these kinds of bussiness.
I would like to get comments to it in order to have it approved (or denied) in
a
2010/9/27 Elena of Valhalla elena.valha...@gmail.com:
There was indeed some discussion on the italian mailing list, where
they felt the need to distinguish between italian style gelateria
and other kinds of ice cream sellers
and not only...
this would give a space for regional variants
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:19:58 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/9/27 Elena of Valhalla
elena.valha...@gmail.com:
of course, we still have the problem with the tag name, since
food+drink doesn't look quite right
if is probably not good English, but I think it's quite appealing:
it is
On Lunes 27 Septiembre 2010 16:09:45 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer escribió:
2010/9/27 Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org:
Hello all:
I've created a proposal (or pre-proposal) in
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:shop#shop.3Dwedding
to tag these kinds of bussiness.
I
On 27/09/2010 15:39, Lennard wrote:
On 27-9-2010 16:25, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
What about abandoned=yes ?
And expect every data consumer to have to parse that in addition to
whatever bridge=* value you leave on the data. What's not there
anymore is just that: not there anymore. It
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 05:19:58PM +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/9/27 Elena of Valhalla elena.valha...@gmail.com:
this would give a space for regional variants such as
food+drink=biergarten|gelateria|whatever_else, preventing the creation
of additional amenities whose usage makes
2010/9/27 Lennard l...@xs4all.nl:
On 27-9-2010 16:25, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
What about abandoned=yes ?
And expect every data consumer to have to parse that in addition to whatever
bridge=* value you leave on the data. What's not there anymore is just that:
not there anymore. It
On 27/09/2010 17:10, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/9/27 Lennardl...@xs4all.nl:
On 27-9-2010 16:25, Noel David Torres Taño wrote:
What about abandoned=yes ?
And expect every data consumer to have to parse that in addition to whatever
bridge=* value you leave on the data. What's not there
On 27-9-2010 16:57, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
Well, you presumably would have an intermediate step in which the railway is no
longer being used for train traffic, but the rails and crossties (also known as
sleepers) have not yet been taken up, so it isn't suitable yet for use as a
cycleway.
On 27-9-2010 17:48, Dave F. wrote:
Many railways in the UK, following Doctor Beeching's cuts, were
abandoned, but much infrastructure, such as bridges, remain, are unused.
If there's a usable bridge, it's bridge=yes. If there's no usable
bridge, it's ruins=bridge or not even that.
is
2010/9/27 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Fast food is simply a style of serving: you go up to the counter and
order. It has nothing to do with the cuisine.
The Italians probably don't like to
On 27/09/2010 17:37, Lennard wrote:
And when I cycle such a thing and want to map it, it's:
highway=cycleway
And I'm done. How am I to know there used to be rails infrastructure
there, years (and years) ago?
If you know - tag it; if not - don't. It's not vital, but could be useful.
But
2010/9/27 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Alessandro Rubini
rubini-l...@gnudd.com wrote:
But the main point of fast-food is fast-meal, and actually people have
lunch in a fast food. But you don't go to a coffee or gelateria to
have lunch, that's the
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:08:56 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
[..]
a restaurant produces the food (prepares it from raw or semi-worked
material).
irony
Then it's clearly craft=restaurant! :-D
[..] A place producing or processing customized goods. [..] craft=* for small
production on demand
2010/9/27 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
It seems to me that landuse is a mess.
+1
landuse=agricultural would include values like farm and vineyard
does this include farmyards, or would they be residential or
industrial? What if they also sell to end customers?
2010/9/27 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
http://www.23hq.com/dieterdreist/photo/6058662
That's clearly not a bridge I wouldn't even bother tagging it.
well, it once was a bridge. I wouldn't tag it as bridge either.
Where as clearly this is even though no traffic passes over it:
2010/9/27 Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org:
I expressely said in the proposal at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:shop that it is not for clothings,
yes, I understood this, but it was not what I expected. And many other
people might not read the definition prior to using
Shop=wedding is ambiguous. Going by the tag name alone it could be a shop
selling wedding supplies (decorative materials used for weddings), a shop
selling wedding gowns, or even a bakery specializing in wedding cakes, or any
combination of the above.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re:
2010/9/27 David Paleino da...@debian.org:
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:08:56 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
a restaurant produces the food (prepares it from raw or semi-worked
material).
Then it's clearly craft=restaurant! :-D
that's not the worst interpretation IMHO. It is much more craft then
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:25 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
Yet there are still two uses of landuse: how people use a parcel of
land (or larger area) vs. how a portion of that area is covered.
One problem, the solution to which doesn't really lend itself to
collaborative
2010/9/27 kerosin kerosin@googlemail.com:
Hey Martin,
I would tag this as with amenity=community_centre! Our aim with that
social_facility-proposal is to capture facilities for people with
disadvantages or people in needs. The amenity you're describing is more
general and responsive to
On 09/27/2010 12:17 PM, Dave F. wrote:
On 27/09/2010 17:37, Lennard wrote:
And when I cycle such a thing and want to map it, it's:
highway=cycleway
And I'm done. How am I to know there used to be rails infrastructure
there, years (and years) ago?
If you know - tag it; if not - don't.
I happened to stumble over
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre
The definition restricts usage with this sentence The Community
Centre is owned and provided by the local government.
The linked wikipedia article
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_centre doesn't for
Your proposed changes make sense to me.
---Original Email---
Subject :[Tagging] community centres
From :mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com
Date :Mon Sep 27 16:02:20 America/Chicago 2010
I happened to stumble over
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre
The
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:39:53 +0200
Lennard l...@xs4all.nl wrote:
That's one thing I've never really understood with railway=abandoned
either. Sure, many of them have been converted into might fine
cycleways, but that's just what they are now: cycleways.
You can abandon a railway and still
On Lunes 27 Septiembre 2010 19:13:32 j...@jfeldredge.com escribió:
Shop=wedding is ambiguous. Going by the tag name alone it could be a shop
selling wedding supplies (decorative materials used for weddings), a shop
selling wedding gowns, or even a bakery specializing in wedding cakes, or
any
agreed. there should be no restriction on who owns/provides the service.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 14:04, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
Your proposed changes make sense to me.
---Original Email---
Subject :[Tagging] community centres
From :mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com
Date :Mon Sep
I am making a simple proposal of roundabout=priority_to_right to
indicate a specific non-standard priority arrangement on some
roundabouts occurring in some parts of mainland Europe.
Please see:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Roundabout_Priority
Comments and suggestions
On 9/27/10 1:08 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
because not everyone to whom you give money to get something can be
considered a retailer. Wikipedia states:In commerce, a retailer
buys goods or products in large quantities from manufacturers or
importers, either directly or through a wholesaler,
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:36:18 +0200, Colin Smale wrote:
I am making a simple proposal of roundabout=priority_to_right to
indicate a specific non-standard priority arrangement on some
roundabouts occurring in some parts of mainland Europe.
Shouldn't this be better done with a proper
Thanks for the comments Martin, response below:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 13:57, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/9/27 kerosin kerosin@googlemail.com:
Hey Martin,
I would tag this as with amenity=community_centre! Our aim with that
social_facility-proposal is to
I prefer wedding_services over wedding_office, as my first thought with
office was one of those Vegas drive-thrus. Either one will still cause some
confusion though.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 11:05, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/9/27 Noel David Torres Taño
2010/9/27 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
I am making a simple proposal of roundabout=priority_to_right to indicate
a specific non-standard priority arrangement on some roundabouts occurring
in some parts of mainland Europe.
Please see:
YMCA is probably a good example of a private community centre.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 27/09/2010 22:01, John F. Eldredge wrote:
On 09/27/2010 12:17 PM, Dave F. wrote:
On 27/09/2010 17:37, Lennard wrote:
And when I cycle such a thing and want to map it, it's:
highway=cycleway
And I'm done. How am I to know there used to be rails infrastructure
there, years (and years)
2010/9/28 Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com:
I took a stab at a definition and updated the wiki; let me know what you
think
A social facility is any place that focuses on improving the lives of others.
that's very generic, while it is true it might still not be very
helpful for a mapper who
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
But only add what is actually visibly there now. Not what was there fifty
years ago.
What was there 50 years ago is useful, and removing it would be
vandalism. You can argue about whether Mapnik should show it, but
don't
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 02:10:20 +0200
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
really? You would tag a place where heroine-addicts go to consume
their drugs healthcare?
social_facility:for=drug_addicted
Caffeine addicts have amenity=cafe
2010/9/28 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
But only add what is actually visibly there now. Not what was there fifty
years ago.
What was there 50 years ago is useful, and removing it would be
vandalism. You can argue
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:23 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/9/28 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
But only add what is actually visibly there now. Not what was there fifty
years ago.
What
On 28/09/2010 01:11, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
But only add what is actually visibly there now. Not what was there fifty
years ago.
What was there 50 years ago is useful,
I agree
and removing it would be
vandalism.
I
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 28/09/2010 01:11, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
But only add what is actually visibly there now. Not what was there fifty
years ago.
What was there 50
On 28 September 2010 10:20, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Caffeine addicts have amenity=cafe
Heroin addicts have the injecting room in Kings Cross, would that be
leisure=injecting_room? :)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On 28 September 2010 10:38, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
If historic data was kept within OSM it would become far to cluttered.
Not if this data was filtered by default, and only shown if requested.
The present method of showing everything is limiting for a number of
reasons.
On 28 September 2010 08:44, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com wrote:
So, regular roundabouts (i.e., those that are common, with priority
to the left) are tagged junction=roundabout, and non-standard
right-hand-priority ones are circular ways without the roundabout tag.
Wouldn't you just
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I disagree. How can it be vandalism if it's not there anymore?
Because we don't only map what's currently there.
To expand on this:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:51:27 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
So, regular roundabouts (i.e., those that are common, with
priority to the left) are tagged junction=roundabout, and
non-standard right-hand-priority ones are circular ways without the
roundabout tag.
On Lunes 27 Septiembre 2010 23:27:18 Sean Horgan escribió:
I prefer wedding_services over wedding_office, as my first thought with
office was one of those Vegas drive-thrus. Either one will still cause
some confusion though.
What about wedding_organization ?
Noel
er Envite
signature.asc
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 17:10, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/9/28 Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com:
I took a stab at a definition and updated the wiki; let me know what you
think
A social facility is any place that focuses on improving the lives of
others.
that's
On 28/09/2010 01:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 28/09/2010 01:11, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
But only add what is actually visibly there now. Not what
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
On 28/09/2010 01:41, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Strawman. We're only talking about former railway alignments.
Hmm... not sure you understand the meaning of the straw man argument.
-
You're (sic) statement Because we
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
