On 28.09.2010 02:48, John Smith wrote:
On 28 September 2010 10:38, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
If historic data was kept within OSM it would become far to cluttered.
Not if this data was filtered by default, and only shown if requested.
The present method of showing everything is
2010/9/28 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net:
On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:51:27 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
So, regular roundabouts (i.e., those that are common, with
priority to the left) are tagged junction=roundabout, and
non-standard right-hand-priority ones are
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 02:50:35AM +0100, Dave F. wrote:
[traffic circles]
Do these genuinely still exist? I thought the French were the only ones
to have these got rid of them when their roundabouts became
gridlocked the rest of Europe took the piss out of them. :-)
here in Italy we
2010/9/28 Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com:
Ok. I'm seeing the trend here: succinctness.
yes, maybe it's my personal preference, but I'd always go for the
shorter version, if the content is the same..
Or is your point that
assisted living is a confusing term?
no, not at all. You are
2010/9/28 Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com:
office=wedding_planner sounds fine to me.
+1
I'm actually going to need one of
those pretty soon ;-)
congrats!
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
The discussion here (and in talk-nl) seems to boil down to the question
whether these traffic circles are a subtype of roundabout, or a junction
type in their own right.
I fully support all those who suggest they are a separate junction type.
My proposal was based on the premise that most people
2010/9/28 Pierre-Alain Dorange pdora...@mac.com:
Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com wrote:
agreed. there should be no restriction on who owns/provides the service.
Yes but then we must provide operator=*
yes, we should encourage the use of operator, which might not be the
same as proprietor
2010/9/28 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
intersections [1]. It is just a road that happens to be circular in
shape, with semaphores or stops along it.
who get's the right of way, when the traffic lights turn off (say due
to a technical problem)? The traffic in the circle or the one
2010/9/28 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2010/9/28 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
intersections [1]. It is just a road that happens to be circular in
shape, with semaphores or stops along it.
who get's the right of way, when the traffic lights turn off (say due
to a
2010/9/28 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2010/9/28 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
2010/9/28 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2010/9/28 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
intersections [1]. It is just a road that happens to be circular in
shape, with
What I'm usually doing for such traffic circles is drawing a circle tagged
highway=* + oneway=yes + a note=this is not a roundabout.
Pieren
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Martes 28 Septiembre 2010 09:06:44 Elena ``of Valhalla'' escribió:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 02:50:35AM +0100, Dave F. wrote:
[traffic circles]
Do these genuinely still exist? I thought the French were the only ones
to have these got rid of them when their roundabouts became
gridlocked
On 9/28/10 8:32 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/9/28 Mike N.nice...@att.net:
office=wedding_planner sounds fine to me.
I agree with this. However, I have also seen a number of local shops
which sell only wedding supplies (dresses, etc) but offer no wedding
services. They could
On Martes 28 Septiembre 2010 13:32:40 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer escribió:
2010/9/28 Mike N. nice...@att.net:
office=wedding_planner sounds fine to me.
I agree with this. However, I have also seen a number of local shops
which sell only wedding supplies (dresses, etc) but offer no wedding
2010/9/28 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
yes, probably a specific tag would be suitable: shop=wedding_dresses
or shop=wedding_clothes.
Because nobody who looks for casual clothing would want to find a
specialized wedding shop, and usually who looks for a wedding shop
would want
2010/9/28 André Riedel riedel.an...@gmail.com:
According to this I found an already exsiting tag in the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:clothes
with clothes=wedding
the page is from August 17th, I don't remember any notice here on
tagging or on talk (or talk:de) and I see the
2010/9/28 Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl:
If you leave it at that, a navigation program might not recognise it as a
{roundabout|traffic_circle} so instead of saying at the next roundabout
take the second exit it would produce confusing instructions.
Another non-problem.
As you
enter the
2010/9/28 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
a satnav tells
me third exit of the roundabout
It's unrelated, but Navit (the supposedly best available navigator
that uses OSM maps) fails utterly at counting the exits of a
roundabout. It will include also oneway ways entering the roundabout,
M?rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
what about changing this to The operator tag is used to name a
company, corporation, person or any other entity who is in charge of
the operation of a certain map object and putting it on top of the
page. We could then put the stuff quoted
sounds good, no objections.
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 01:59, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
2010/9/28 Pierre-Alain Dorange pdora...@mac.com:
Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com wrote:
agreed. there should be no restriction on who owns/provides the
service.
Yes but then
2010/9/28 Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com:
sounds good, no objections.
OK, as this is IMHO no real change, I put it in the wiki.
Now I realized something else:
according to the German ML for tagging certain objects 3 tags are useful:
name, operator, brand
e.g. a petrol station:
name would be
On 28/09/2010 10:28, M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2010/9/28 Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com:
For those who want to keep historic records ( I think there should be),
they should take a record of current data at regular intervals keep it in
a separate database.
that's not a good option: those
2010/9/28 Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com:
I know the voting has started and changes to the proposal are off-limits,
but I was considering the addition of animals to the social_facility:for
subtag:
{{tag|social_facility:for|animals}}
for me it's fine, but there is also a dedicated animal
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 03:41:49PM +0200, Simone Saviolo wrote:
2010/9/28 Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com:
a satnav tells
me third exit of the roundabout
It's unrelated, but Navit (the supposedly best available navigator
that uses OSM maps) fails utterly at counting the exits of a
On Martes 28 Septiembre 2010 18:56:10 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer escribió:
2010/9/28 Sean Horgan seanhor...@gmail.com:
sounds good, no objections.
OK, as this is IMHO no real change, I put it in the wiki.
Now I realized something else:
according to the German ML for tagging certain objects 3
2010/9/28 Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org:
How to tag those? operator is the bank or the network?
I'd say operator is the bank.
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
At 2010-09-28 11:43, Sean Horgan wrote:
Hotels are similar to petrol
stations in that many are independently owned and operated but rely
heavily on the brand for marketing. Â Coffee shops, Â fastfood
restaurants and any other franchise-business fall into the same bucket Â
(starbucks, mcdonalds,
What we generally have around here is a shop that both sells and rents
formal wear - sometimes one sex, often both. They do weddings, school
formals, black tie dinners etc. I'd call this a formal wear shop.
One that sells nothing but wedding dresses is a subset of this (and
very rare around here,
Let's racionalize this all.
Bussiness that sell bride dresses only
[Comments here]
Bussiness that sell ceremonial dresses (bride and bridmaiden, groom, black
tie, New Year, cocktail dresses... men and women, even childs)
[Comments here]
Bussiness that sell decorative wedding stuff
On Miércoles 29 Septiembre 2010 03:05:50 Noel David Torres Taño escribió:
Let's racionalize this all.
Bussiness that sell bride dresses only
They sell, so it's shop.
I think shop=bride_dresses
Bussiness that sell ceremonial dresses (bride and bridmaiden, groom, black
tie, New Year, cocktail
Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org wrote:
Bussiness that sell bride dresses only
shop=clothes
clothes=wedding_dresses
Bussiness that sell ceremonial dresses (bride and bridmaiden, groom, black
tie,
New Year, cocktail dresses... men and women, even childs)
shop=clothes
It looks like you have come up with good solutions to all of the issues raised.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] shop=wedding_office
From :mailto:simonbi...@yahoo.com.au
Date :Tue Sep 28 22:00:09 America/Chicago 2010
Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org wrote:
On Miércoles 29 Septiembre 2010 04:00:09 Simon Biber escribió:
Noel David Torres Taño env...@rolamasao.org wrote:
Bussiness that sell bride dresses only
shop=clothes
clothes=wedding_dresses
Bussiness that sell ceremonial dresses (bride and bridmaiden, groom,
black tie,
New Year,
33 matches
Mail list logo
