On 01/03/2011 08:11 AM, Dave F. wrote:
On 03/01/2011 03:50, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 01/01/2011 07:54 AM, Dave F. wrote:
Is the adjacent path shared? if so, note that that would be the safer
passage.
Most states prohibit bicycles from sidewalks, or limit their speed to a
walking speed on
On 4 January 2011 07:19, Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
BTW: My feeling is, that sluice gates formerly were tagged with
waterway=weir most of the time anyway.
Doesn't mean they shouldn't be updated/added if there is a better tag...
The suggested term floodgate would be more
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On 01/03/2011 08:11 AM, Dave F. wrote:
On 03/01/2011 03:50, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 01/01/2011 07:54 AM, Dave F. wrote:
Is the adjacent path shared? if so, note that that would be the safer
passage.
Most states prohibit
I'm interested in mapping which direction of a street slopes down
(mainly for cycling purposes). The contour lines used by OpenCycleMap
don't have nearly enough resolution for this, yet many streets have a
noticeable slope (which can also be seen in how the roadside drains
are designed). Is there
At 2011-01-04 07:13, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Is there a way to tag that a street is downhill in the
forward or backward direction?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline
--
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net
___
Tagging mailing list
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 4:00 AM, Ralf Kleineisel r...@kleineisel.de wrote:
On 02.01.2011 22:40, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Ralf Kleineisel r...@kleineisel.de wrote:
I do not want someone telling me this is not relevant enough and
having the right to delete my edits.
Then
Of course, this will require breaking the way into segments each time the slope
changes between uphill and downhill. On some terrain this won't be an issue,
but on rolling terrain you may have to have a great many nodes. Also, the
slope will need to be determined by someone on the ground, as
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2011-01-04 07:13, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Is there a way to tag that a street is downhill in the
forward or backward direction?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline
Ah yes, that's what I was looking
It was June, here's the start of the thread:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2010-June/002563.html
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 6:53 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com
wrote:
A scan through the
2011/1/4 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
I have a feeling we discussed this a few months ago. My suggestion
would be to simply use numbers, if you're talking about a ranking
scheme:
aeroway=aerodrome
aerodrome_level=1|2|3|4|5
I agree. This does not mean that we cannot additionally tag
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 12:45 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, I definitely think we should try and align to external standards.
+1
Look at the ICAO classifications.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airspace_class
Nonetheless I think the OSM classifications are good
On 5 January 2011 04:06, Osmisto osmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
The vote for new tag shop=baby_care has been started. I've removed
section with 'assortment=*' to make it simple and propose one thing in a
time.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Infant_care_shop#Vote
The Brussels cycle map (unfortunately only available in a print
version, as far as I can see) uses a coloured line on the right side
of the road for notably uphill (pink) and severely uphill (red). It
takes a bit of getting used to, but it conveys the information
reasonably efficiently.
Richard
On 4 January 2011 02:26, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/12/17 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
Yes and it would fine if we could continue in that way. Since landuses
shouldn't overlap
where do you get this from? IMHO this is not defined in the wiki and
looking at current
On 4/01/2011 7:20 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
They both have elements of flow control, but function in quite different
ways and look very different. A weir is used to raise the water level or
control flow, with water flowing over the top. A sluice gate is essentially
a valve for small waterways.
On 5 January 2011 11:38, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm wary of the endless drive to create more high-level tags. It increases
the burden on reusers of the data.
Normally I'd agree with you 100%, but in this case it's a bit
different because as pointed out earlier weirs tend to be
On 5 January 2011 10:39, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
Then you get the ambiguous tags, which can be both. What is a forest?
A place where forestry (timber cutting, etc) happens? That's land
Actually I remember reading this in some other thread a long time ago,
a forest originally
On 5/01/2011 3:18 PM, John Smith wrote:
Perhaps a more generic approach would work, eg
waterway=flow_control
flow_control=weir|sluice_gate|flood_gate|spillway_gate|
Yeah something like that would be reasonable. What I'd like to see a lot
more of is planning ahead: coming up with a scheme
On 5/01/2011 4:58 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Look at the ICAO classifications.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airspace_class
That would work for airspace, but what about for airport classifications
themselves? I can't find anything on Wikipedia, other than individual
articles on regional
19 matches
Mail list logo
