On 1 March 2011 21:47, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com wrote:
You'all are welcome to:
1) Make another proposal
2) Vote yes or no to the proposal as it stands
It's not appropriate to fine-tune the proposal during the voting stage
- you either approve or oppose it as it stands.
2011/3/2 Markus Lindholm markus.lindh...@gmail.com:
My proposal is simply to use an other key, and once a better name for
the key is agreed upon to change the existing tags to use the new key
it might also help to use namespaces for the values, like
uk:public_bridleway
instead of
M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
it might also help to use namespaces for the values, like
uk:public_bridleway
instead of public_bridleway
So I presume you're planning to do that for other tags whose meaning varies
by country, like highway=uk:trunk, highway=de:motorway...
OSM. For People Who Don't
2011/3/2 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
it might also help to use namespaces for the values, like
uk:public_bridleway
instead of public_bridleway
So I presume you're planning to do that for other tags whose meaning varies
by country, like
Tordanik wrote:
I'm still not quite sure whether I understand what designation=*
is supposed to do.
It's to record the legal status, or designation, of a given object - whether
that object be a footpath, a waterway, or whatever.
Having now looked at the wiki voting page I'm afraid the
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 8:21 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Tordanik wrote:
I'm still not quite sure whether I understand what designation=*
is supposed to do.
It's to record the legal status, or designation, of a given object - whether
that object be a footpath, a
On 03/02/2011 05:01 PM, Richard Mann wrote:
I reckon the voting is running at about 24000 a handful for, and a
handful against.
Oh, come on. If you’re going to count every element tagged with
designation=* as a “vote for” you really ought to count every element
*not* tagged with
