Dear all,
in order to create an easy way of mapping stacked, identical structures and
vertical ways, I have created the proposal of a level map.
The main purpose is to be able to map ways of general interest through
multi-floor buildings (in particular where multiple rounds through
Hi. The proposal for marking building entrances with entrance=* tags
was discussed a year and a half ago, but didn't really go anywhere:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/entrance
Notice that there is a conversion mentioned in it, from deprecated
building=entrance.
Hi,
On 10/12/2011 11:12 PM, Ilya Zverev wrote:
An hour ago there was a big changset (#9541529) from one of belarusian
mappers changing 21640 building=entrance to entrance=yes in several
countries, including Russia. This is not the first attempt, and I'm
undoing it now.
Please let them know
Pieren wrote:
It was not widely discussed but the proposal seems to be accepted as
an improvement. But deprecating a tag is never easy in OSM. It needs a
large consensus, a wide audience and time ...
The proposal is actually well designed in that regard. It doesn't
redefine any existing tags
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Ilya Zverev zve...@textual.ru wrote:
Hi. The proposal for marking building entrances with entrance=* tags was
discussed a year and a half ago, but didn't really go anywhere:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/entrance
An hour ago there was
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Ilya Zverev zve...@textual.ru wrote:
Hi. The proposal for marking building entrances with entrance=* tags was
discussed a year and a half ago, but didn't really go anywhere:
On 10/12/2011 6:52 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
Please let me know when did my private renderer for those
building=entrances cease being something that renders (besides the times
when my VM is down of course :-))? ...Honestly, I think you just _assumed_
that nobody is using the data for anything
I think you meant might be advised rather than need
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
If entrance=* is being used at all, you need to change your rendering to
support it, whether or not existing building=entrances are being changed.
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Ilpo Järvinen
ilpo.jarvi...@helsinki.fi wrote:
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Erik Johansson wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:12 PM, Ilya Zverev zve...@textual.ru wrote:
aren't we better of without building=entrance? I really
hope that DWG can be kept out of this.
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 10/12/2011 6:52 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
Please let me know when did my private renderer for those
building=entrances cease being something that renders (besides the
times
when my VM is down of course :-))? ...Honestly, I think you just
On Thu, Oct 13, 2011 at 1:14 AM, Ilpo Järvinen
ilpo.jarvi...@helsinki.fi wrote:
But that's still besides my point which
is that deprication should be handled properly instead of giving those
hints for DWG to not interfere on mass removal even before anything
is official.
FYI, I'm not against
So, how about proposals to replace tags globally? For example, after
this proposal is accepted, we could start voting on mass-retagging
entrances, so 1) it's official; 2) most data consumers get to know about
the change and adjust their software accordingly? With this we could
make a precedent
2011/10/13 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com:
Further I would like to propose railway=subway_entrance =
entrance=public_transport, since it's probably interesting to have on
bus/boat/rail terminals as well, now this is a bit more tricky since
it already renders.
As the creator of the proposal
13 matches
Mail list logo
