On 06/03/12 03:32, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 03/05/2012 08:12 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes_and_complex_intersections_visual_approach
User Cmuelle8 insists on adding it to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lane_tagging_comparison#A_visual_approach
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Definitely not how to map an intersection. AU list have had several
discussions on this and it's junk mapping.
I still believe that mapping each lane is easier than using verbose
and encrypted tags (probably that need some
Martin Vonwald wrote:
1) The objective part: How is it done currently? Take a look at my
first example in the proposal - it's using maxspeed. How is maxspeed
currently tagged? According to the wiki maxspeed:forward and
maxspeed:backward should be used. What tells use taginfo? The
The much more relevant precedent are existing attempts to tag lanes. One
example is indeed lanes:forward/backward. But there are other examples for
existing lane tagging which are also documented on the wiki, and used more
frequently than your example according to taginfo:
~ 11.500
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 1:43 AM, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Definitely not how to map an intersection. AU list have had several
discussions on this and it's junk mapping.
I still believe that mapping each lane is
On 06/03/2012, at 10.43, Pieren wrote:
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com
wrote:
Definitely not how to map an intersection. AU list have had several
discussions on this and it's junk mapping.
I still believe that mapping each lane is easier than using verbose
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't agree with
planned-but-abandoned features being stored except in unusual
circumstances.
Key distinction is
planned-but-never-built (county plat book fantasy roads),
vs built, used, then abandoned
On 3/6/12 9:22 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Frederik Rammfrede...@remote.org wrote:
I just found the idea of saying this is a railway - a never-built one, but
a railway nonetheless a little extravagant.
umm, not never built. never completed. and in this case, a
