At 2012-04-14 22:10, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
In the U.S., a gated residential community usually allows anyone in who
has a legitimate reason to be there (e.g. visiting a friend, delivering a
package, repairing a TV). It seems that this fits access=destination as
well as private. Would it be
On Sunday, April 15, 2012, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-14 22:10, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
In the U.S., a gated residential community usually allows anyone in who
has a legitimate reason to be there (e.g. visiting a friend, delivering a
package, repairing a TV). It seems that this fits
On 4/15/2012 3:55 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-14 22:10, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
In the U.S., a gated residential community usually allows anyone in
who has a legitimate reason to be there (e.g. visiting a friend,
delivering a package, repairing a TV). It seems that this fits
Am 13. April 2012 19:44 schrieb John Sturdy jcg.stu...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Prices on the other hand
are also of interest if you look for a hotel, but there is currently
no hope to keep this information up to date (and
Am 14. April 2012 03:10 schrieb Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Possible values:
surface=historic_cobblestone
surface=preserved_cobblestone
surface=rounded_cobblestone
I'd prefer to focus on the shape and therefore rounded_cobblestone,
because other aspects like historic can be expressed
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
That's always useful, but it doesn't solve the issue of getting the
data for a query like: give me all the hotels cheaper than 66 EUR for
a double room with bathroom in this bounding box.
I'm not sure why you
I'm not sure why you would attempt such a query with nothing but OSM
data. There are multiple websites that specialize in this type of
thing and are far better at it than OSM will ever be because they have
direct interaction with hotels to handle the volatility in prices,
room availability
At 2012-04-15 01:10, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
How would you distinguish an entry for visitors from an entry for
residents only?
name= or ref= or whatever else Mapnik was designed to render on a gate.
--
Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net
___
Btw. I think current Mapnik rendering renders addr:housenumber=* over
barrier=gate .
Meaning: if u tag em both u won't see the gate icon at all but only the house
number. .. Which imho is not ideal.
I'd love to see both rendered (when space allows) as both are of high
importance.
This is
Le 15/04/2012 10:10, Nathan Edgars II a écrit :
On 4/15/2012 3:55 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-14 22:10, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
In the U.S., a gated residential community usually allows anyone in
who has a legitimate reason to be there (e.g. visiting a friend,
delivering a package,
At 2012-04-15 05:38, Jaakko Helleranta.com wrote:
Btw. I think current Mapnik rendering renders addr:housenumber=* over
barrier=gate .
Meaning: if u tag em both u won't see the gate icon at all but only the
house number. .. Which imho is not ideal.
I'd love to see both rendered (when space
I prefer tagging the addr:housenumber on building outline, landuse, parcel,
etc, too. That's clearly the right place for it.
The challenge, though, is that if/when one is simply driving by it's very
difficult to know especially in densly built areas where the # should be placed
-- even when
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 14. April 2012 03:10 schrieb Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
Possible values:
surface=historic_cobblestone
surface=preserved_cobblestone
surface=rounded_cobblestone
I'd prefer to focus on the shape and therefore
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
On the other hand, private says Only with permission of the owner on
an individual basis. But the owner is the homeowners association, and
the individual residents can allow people in.
That's creating nits where they don't even exist! Owner is a
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2012, 15:42:29 schrieb fly:
I still do not get one major point which was totally left out on the first
scheme. What actually belongs to a point and how are they tagged.
Especially
on big crossings and roundabouts I always was confused (e.g. it might be
possible
Am 15. April 2012 12:22 schrieb Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com:
I'm not sure why you would attempt such a query with nothing but OSM
data. There are multiple websites that specialize in this type of
thing and are far better at it than OSM will ever be because they have
direct interaction
On 15 April 2012 11:33, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
That's always useful, but it doesn't solve the issue of getting the
data for a query like: give me all the hotels cheaper than 66 EUR for
a
Am 15. April 2012 10:10 schrieb Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com:
How would you distinguish an entry for visitors from an entry for residents
only?
There is already an extension to the barrier class which allows to
mark the presence of a guard.
page:
Am 15. April 2012 15:15 schrieb Jaakko Helleranta.com jaa...@helleranta.com:
I prefer tagging the addr:housenumber on building outline, landuse, parcel,
etc, too. That's clearly the right place for it.
what is right and what is wrong depends on the circumstances. I
also prefer tagging
On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand, private says Only with permission of the owner on an
individual basis. But the owner is the homeowners association, and the
individual residents can allow people in.
And so could the security
On 4/15/2012 6:30 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-15 01:10, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
How would you distinguish an entry for visitors from an entry for
residents only?
name= or ref= or whatever else Mapnik was designed to render on a gate.
That's only a solution if the gates actually have
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/15/2012 6:30 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-15 01:10, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
How would you distinguish an entry for visitors from an entry for
residents only?
name= or ref= or whatever else Mapnik was designed to render on a
gate.
Am 15.04.2012 23:51, schrieb John F. Eldredge:
I have seen gates that had number signs (1, 2, 3, etc., not a street
address). This number would logically go into the name tag.
If these numbers are, what I expect them to be, then it's not a name,
but a reference, and should go into the ref-Tag
Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
Am 15.04.2012 23:51, schrieb John F. Eldredge:
I have seen gates that had number signs (1, 2, 3, etc., not a
street
address). This number would logically go into the name tag.
If these numbers are, what I expect them to be, then it's
At 2012-04-15 13:55, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 4/15/2012 6:30 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-15 01:10, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
How would you distinguish an entry for visitors from an entry for
residents only?
name= or ref= or whatever else Mapnik was designed to render on a gate.
That's
On 4/15/2012 10:39 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-15 13:55, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 4/15/2012 6:30 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-15 01:10, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
How would you distinguish an entry for visitors from an entry for
residents only?
name= or ref= or whatever else Mapnik
26 matches
Mail list logo
