Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

2015-02-20 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 19 February 2015 at 00:04, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: leisure=maze 77 attraction=maze 147 So the usage is split about even.. Looks more like 1:2 to me. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Tagging mailing

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - power_supply=intermittent

2015-02-20 Thread François Lacombe
Hi, I've put some feedbacks on the Talk page of this proposal. It would be good to discuss those points before the vote start. Cheers. *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux http://www.twitter.com/InfosReseaux 2015-02-18 9:22 GMT+01:00

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=storage: additional values for key parking

2015-02-20 Thread johnw
On Feb 20, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: On 20/02/2015 1:22 PM, johnw wrote: I think he’s trying to say that “a storage amenity” is different from a parking amenity”, because it is not something you would seek out on the map when looking for parking (even long

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=storage: additional values for key parking

2015-02-20 Thread Jan van Bekkum
Thanks again, makes sense. What is the best way to map what vehicles the storage is intended for? motorcar=yes? Access=motorcar, access=caravan would duplicate the key So it would become: shop=vehicle_storage covered=yes motorcar=yes caravan=yes On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 9:35:09 AM johnw

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=storage: additional values for key parking

2015-02-20 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-02-20 13:42 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com: So it would become: shop=vehicle_storage covered=yes motorcar=yes caravan=yes I wouldn't use the shop key but something like amenity, and motorcar is a legal access restriction, so should be something different as well.

[Tagging] restricted *way=* with additional access

2015-02-20 Thread fly
Am 19.02.2015 um 18:05 schrieb Pieren: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote: How is routing software supposed to know that some aerialway=goods are actually taking passengers? like roads tagged with access=no or private. Or highway=pedestrian not allowed

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - power_supply=intermittent

2015-02-20 Thread Jan van Bekkum
Sure, see my feedback there. On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 9:35:43 AM François Lacombe fl.infosrese...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've put some feedbacks on the Talk page of this proposal. It would be good to discuss those points before the vote start. Cheers. *François Lacombe* fl dot

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:waste_collection

2015-02-20 Thread Marc Gemis
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: On 19/02/2015 9:59 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2015-02-18 23:09 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/waste_collection Isn't there a lot of overlap with

Re: [Tagging] building=yes on nodes?

2015-02-20 Thread Lukas Sommer
Okay. I’ll adapt the few remaining building=* value wiki pages that do not allow nodes  … 2015-02-17 0:32 GMT, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote: All building=* on nodes is fine. As others have pointed out, it is

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=storage: additional values for key parking

2015-02-20 Thread John Willis
Sent from my iPhone On Feb 20, 2015, at 9:47 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2015-02-20 13:42 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum jan.vanbek...@gmail.com: So it would become: shop=vehicle_storage covered=yes motorcar=yes caravan=yes I wouldn't use the shop key but

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Draft - Sanitary Dump Station

2015-02-20 Thread David Bannon
Bryce, given the discussion that took place on the mailing list prior to you hitting the wiki, maybe its time you (as proposer) started the clock ? So, if you declare today start of RFC, two weeks, start voting ? David On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 23:23 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: It's clear

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:waste_collection

2015-02-20 Thread David Bannon
Warin (and Bryce), would it be appropriate to cross reference this proposal with the one for amenity=sanitary_dump_station ?? They clearly relate to each other and voters may need to consider both. Should it be documented how to handle a situation if both get up ? While Bryce's proposal covers

Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

2015-02-20 Thread John F. Eldredge
Given that both the multiple-path and single-path definitions are in use, the OSM definition of labyrinth should not exclude either one. -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that. Dr.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:waste_collection

2015-02-20 Thread Warin
On 21/02/2015 2:43 PM, David Bannon wrote: Warin (and Bryce), would it be appropriate to cross reference this proposal with the one for amenity=sanitary_dump_station ?? They clearly relate to each other and voters may need to consider both. I consider those that vote against either ..

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sanitary Dump Station / Elsan Point / CDP

2015-02-20 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Sanitary_Dump_Station Dump station, dump point, caravan dump station, pumpout, sanitary station, Elsan disposal point (UK) and chemical dump point (CDP). It seems universal that people use euphemisms for human waste: there are a lot of name.

Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

2015-02-20 Thread Brad Neuhauser
The maze/labyrinth distinction is there. When I hear of modern labyrinths, it's usually in the context of religious/spiritual uses (since there's only one way, it lends itself to a walking meditation). Mazes are generally like a recreational puzzle, where you're trying to find your way. Whether

Re: [Tagging] building=yes on nodes?

2015-02-20 Thread AYTOUN RALPH
In a discussion with Ivan Gayton of MSF on this subject and his view on the humanitarian angle isthey prefer the area to be shown rather than the node. They use the area in estimating the number of occupants (for which they have worked out an average table for the areas they require). So

Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

2015-02-20 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
Various new age spiritual communities have a strong definition of labyrinth: it's one path, no dead ends, leading to a center. There are dozens in my area. The term is widespread and common, as is the feature. The one path labyrinth is a mappable feature in OSM, even if Merriam Webster has not

Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

2015-02-20 Thread John F. Eldredge
Labyrinths aren't usually defined as having only one way through them. They normally have side passages, although, like other mazes, there may be only one path that will succeed in taking you all of the way to the exit. -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com Darkness cannot drive out

Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

2015-02-20 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:24 AM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: Labyrinths aren't usually defined as having only one way through them. They normally have side passages, although, like other mazes, there may be only one path that will succeed in taking you all of the way to the

Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

2015-02-20 Thread John F. Eldredge
Here is the definition from my Merriam'Webster dictionary: 1 a : a place constructed of or full of intricate passageways and blind alleys   b : a maze (as in a garden) formed by paths separated by high hedges 2 : something extremely complex or tortuous in structure, arrangement, or character : 

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:waste_collection

2015-02-20 Thread Warin
On 21/02/2015 1:28 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: On 19/02/2015 9:59 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2015-02-18 23:09 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com: