Thanks for picking up on this. I used the tag a while ago to tag a coal
conveyor here in Thailand. Of course it doesn't render on OSM and I'll need
to come up with a way to render it for my GPS at some point. Seeing as
there are so many existing man_made=good_conveyor tags I agree with your
Hi!
I obviously forgot how to tag breakdown bays (lay-bys, german:
Pannenbucht), something like this: http://binged.it/1LCYpoM
Couldn't find anything in the wiki or taginfo.
Any tips?
Best regards,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
On 25.02.2015 11:47, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
it is using the natural language notation with space (underscore)
rather than diameter:crown.
I feel that this differentiation became blurry due to the random use of :
and _ for _type and :type suffixes.
--
Friedrich K. Volkmann
2015-02-25 15:20 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com:
I obviously forgot how to tag breakdown bays (lay-bys, german:
Pannenbucht), something like this: http://binged.it/1LCYpoM
Couldn't find anything in the wiki or taginfo.
could be something for the emergency key? Or highway.
2015-02-25 14:13 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Goods_conveyor
I resurrected this old draft, because we need a tag for this and I know of
no alternative tag currently in use. I wonder if goods may be misleading,
because I
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Goods_conveyor
I resurrected this old draft, because we need a tag for this and I know of
no alternative tag currently in use. I wonder if goods may be misleading,
because I think of goods as finished products, while many conveyors carry
raw
2015-01-23 8:55 GMT+01:00 Swen Wacker swen.wac...@gmail.com:
2015-01-22 19:44 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
In Germany the address always belongs to the plot and not to the
building and they are assigned in advance.
This is not correct. The decision is up to the local
2015-01-21 13:00 GMT+01:00 Andrew Shadura and...@shadura.me:
But that's not precisely true. The scope of an address node inside a
building outline is this building. If you want to specify an address
for a part of a building only, just split that building.
no, you seem to extrapolate from
Though, I have to admit that introducing new categories nor moving tags
from one to another is not easy and often bricks, like osm-carto will
not support it for quite some time, are through between your legs.
Still in favour of introducing some more categories.
cu fly
Am 24.02.2015 um 20:02
2015-02-25 14:23 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:
On 25.02.2015 11:47, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
it is using the natural language notation with space (underscore)
rather than diameter:crown.
I feel that this differentiation became blurry due to the random use of :
and _ for
2015-02-25 16:34 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
So what do you have in mind ? Tagging them as additional tag on the way
with highway=*? Using lanes:-Tagging ?
I don't think of them as lanes, so I wouldn't use some :lanes-tag. I
thought that there is already a tag, that I simply put
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:13:34PM +0100, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Goods_conveyor
I resurrected this old draft, because we need a tag for this and I know of
no alternative tag currently in use. I wonder if goods may be misleading,
because
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/emergency_bay
On 25 February 2015 at 15:33, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-02-25 15:20 GMT+01:00 Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com:
I obviously forgot how to tag breakdown bays (lay-bys, german:
Pannenbucht),
On 25.02.2015 15:42, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
is this for belt conveyors and roller conveyors? There are also pneumatic
conveyors (with tubes, e.g. postal pneumatic tubes) and there are chain
conveyors.
See the subtags section in the proposal. By proposal I mean the wiki page.
--
Friedrich
2015-02-25 15:09 GMT+01:00 Swen Wacker swen.wac...@gmail.com:
I have not yet found any text that doesn't state that the plot is the main
unit for numbering
http://www.rosenheim.de/uploads/media/631f.pdf
http://www.bad-doberan.de/uploads/media/Hausnummernsatzung.pdf
Hm...had a quick look how they are tagged and I'm not really convinced.
They are tagged as area beside the road (without any connection) or as
individual roads. In my opinion both does not fit well :-/
Thanks anyway,
Martin
2015-02-25 16:11 GMT+01:00 Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com:
Here in Italy they are tagged in some areas and as nodes:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/7SA
On 25 February 2015 at 16:19, Martin Vonwald imagic@gmail.com wrote:
Hm...had a quick look how they are tagged and I'm not really convinced.
They are tagged as area beside the road (without any
Am 25.02.2015 um 16:19 schrieb Martin Vonwald:
Hm...had a quick look how they are tagged and I'm not really convinced.
They are tagged as area beside the road (without any connection) or as
individual roads. In my opinion both does not fit well :-/
So what do you have in mind ? Tagging them as
Am 25.02.2015 um 16:41 schrieb Martin Vonwald:
2015-02-25 16:34 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
So what do you have in mind ? Tagging them as additional tag on the way
with highway=*? Using lanes:-Tagging ?
I don't think of them as lanes, so I wouldn't use some :lanes-tag. I
Hi all,
I have a situation where a cycleway=track is not a oneway, while the
highway itself is a oneway=yes. So I added oneway:bicycle=no to the way
because it is true from at least one point of view.
The same problem applies to cycleway=opposite_track.
BTW: Neither graphhopper nor mapquest
On 25/02/2015 16:41, Martin Vonwald wrote:
I don't think of them as lanes, so I wouldn't use some :lanes-tag. I
thought that there is already a tag, that I simply put on the road for
the length of the bay - just like e.g. sidewalk=right. But that's
obviously not the case and it is not possible
On 25.02.2015 17:16, Richard Z. wrote:
there is aerialway=magic_carpet which is intended for human transport only
but together with usage access keys could be used to tag that as well.
I don't think so, because:
- goods conveyors are not really aerialways
- goods conveyors are not called magic
2015-02-25 15:57 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
thank you for these references. I have noticed that all of them reference
the BauGB §126, which seems to confirm that this is the legal basis for the
numbering
Are you kidding me? :-)
1. Neither
If all these goods conveyors could be consolidated under one tag, it
would be far easier to gain rendering support.
Subtags could be used for the infinite variety of types.
Basically these are linear structures on the ground, which convey something
(goods, passengers, mixed),
and either do or
Hey Tobias.
The implied problem in your question is how to interpret a (main) tag on an
osm_way. Does it only apply to the carriageway/driving lanes or to the whole
street which also includes cycleways, sidewalks, etc ? Just consider the
width=* or lanes=* tags.
Yet, I wouldn't go so far as
Hello.
This is a request for comments for the proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/traffic_signals_group
The original author is Sanderd17. With the consent of him, I did some
supplementing. Thanks to Sanerd17!
Unlike the proposal “Proposed features/Traffic Signals” of
Am 25.02.2015 um 22:20 schrieb Hubert:
The implied problem in your question is how to interpret a (main) tag on an
osm_way. Does it only apply to the carriageway/driving lanes or to the whole
street which also includes cycleways, sidewalks, etc ? Just consider the
width=* or lanes=* tags.
Am 26.02.2015 um 01:54 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
I'd say you have met the limits of cycleway=track. You can solve this by
creating a proper osm object for what is a distinct way in the real world as
well.
Well, this is almost the same as cycleway=opposite_track, but that tag
is obviously
Hi,
This could be confused with the coordination of traffic signals along a
length of road or even a district wide coordination of traffic light
signals.
I think it needs some words that restrict it to a single intersection?
And possibly some thought to where a length of road (many
Matter in a nutshell: Certainly the way we use these super tags has a
lot of historical baggage but I don't think it is a stupid idea per se,
*especially* if your goal is (like you're claiming yours to be) making
tags easy for mappers.
I apologize for writing like a troll. I should have been
I'd say you have met the limits of cycleway=track. You can solve this by
creating a proper osm object for what is a distinct way in the real world as
well.
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 07:14:36PM +0100, Friedrich Volkmann wrote:
The proposal looks good, add location=* to it.
I dislike location=* for various reasons. But you may use it if you like.
the proposal could be more detailed in this point. How do
you tag conveyors above ground? As bridge?
The proposal looks good, add location=* to it.
I dislike location=* for various reasons. But you may use it if you like.
I first came across the location key when it was used to indicate whether
the Trans-Alaska Pipeline was running underground or overground. At the
time I thought it was a
Would layer work for this. A layer of zero for something you can't pass
at ground level.
A layer of -1 for pipelines. A layer of 1 for ski lifts and areoways.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
If group is not a good word, then set is a good alternative.
Javbw
On Feb 26, 2015, at 8:33 AM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This could be confused with the coordination of traffic signals along a
length of road or even a district wide coordination of traffic light signals.
The Trans-Alaska pipeline has many underground sections and these have no
layer tag. Why that is, I don't know. It also uses a key type to specify
what it carries. In this case type=oil
See here: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/7SZ
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:49 AM, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:
On 26/02/2015 12:28 PM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
The proposal looks good, add location=* to it.
I dislike location=* for various reasons. But you may use it if you
like.
I first came across the location key when it was used to indicate
whether the Trans-Alaska Pipeline was running
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:55 PM, John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:
If group is not a good word, then set is a good alternative.
intersection_group=
intersection_set=
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
Looks like this has already been discussed .. in 2008 to 2011.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Proposed_features/Set_of_Traffic_Signals
No outcome for that ..
Past discussion looks to have pointed to a relation ... the relation
contains each node of traffic_light and can have a name=
This construct does not come from a natural language. It's rather computer
programming style, like class::subclass (see maxwidth:physical=*, name:en=*
etc.), and it's also in spirit of mathematical notation (functions,
subscripts), like diameter(crown).
On 23.02.2015 23:48, Colin Smale wrote:
No
2015-02-25 11:41 GMT+01:00 Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:
This construct does not come from a natural language. It's rather computer
programming style, like class::subclass (see maxwidth:physical=*, name:en=*
etc.), and it's also in spirit of mathematical notation (functions,
subscripts),
41 matches
Mail list logo
