Re: [Tagging] route=foot

2015-03-08 Thread Tod Fitch
On Mar 8, 2015, at 2:07 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: I question this usage, mostly because UK Scouts seem to match US usage, which would call what you're calling a hike more like a march, or if it's really bad, a death march. US Scouts might hyperbolize intentionally to Rattan Death March for

Re: [Tagging] route=foot

2015-03-08 Thread Paul Johnson
On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 6:37 AM, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 13:06 +0100, Marc Gemis wrote: In Belgium and The Netherlands we have tagged all the regional walking networks as foot. With this system of walking networks it is possible to plan walks as short

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reception Desk

2015-03-08 Thread Jan van Bekkum
+1 On Sun, Mar 8, 2015, 23:09 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote: On 9/03/2015 1:22 AM, Andreas Goss wrote: Why do you even bother with a proposal when you bascially don't care about tagging? I care to get good, if not the best, tags. I try to get ideas for these from the tagging group.

Re: [Tagging] Draft Proposed Relationship Area Steps

2015-03-08 Thread Warin
On 9/03/2015 12:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: Am 05.03.2015 um 23:14 schrieb Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com: On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com mailto:jan...@gmail.com wrote: would do it like this:

Re: [Tagging] Tagging for an event space / function hall?

2015-03-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 05.03.2015 um 21:49 schrieb Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com: Many if not most event halls are in fact something else ALSO, like a church or a community centre or a bed and breakfast. Thus the tag should NOT be in an existing namespace like amenity, shop or tourism or building.

Re: [Tagging] domestic fuel transport delivery мазут

2015-03-08 Thread Warin
On 9/03/2015 11:13 AM, André Pirard wrote: On 2015-03-08 22:47, Philip Barnes wrote : On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 14:47 +0100, André Pirard wrote: Hi, I've tried to no avail those keywords for what I suppose you understand what I mean. A man doing his business of delivering fuel with his lorry in

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reception Desk

2015-03-08 Thread Warin
On 9/03/2015 1:22 AM, Andreas Goss wrote: Why do you even bother with a proposal when you bascially don't care about tagging? I care to get good, if not the best, tags. I try to get ideas for these from the tagging group. I don't care for arguments on a proposal that are not directly

Re: [Tagging] Draft Proposed Relationship Area Steps

2015-03-08 Thread Janko Mihelić
2015-03-08 14:37 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: How would you know which steps are the ones vanishing? I think I found a solution, a tag start_step_offset=*. If the lowest step of the whole staircase is the first step, start_step_offset says at which offset every way

Re: [Tagging] Draft Proposed Relationship Area Steps

2015-03-08 Thread Warin
On 9/03/2015 10:45 AM, Janko Mihelić wrote: 2015-03-08 14:37 GMT+01:00 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com: How would you know which steps are the ones vanishing? I think I found a solution, a tag start_step_offset=*. If the lowest step of the whole

Re: [Tagging] domestic fuel transport delivery мазут

2015-03-08 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 14:47 +0100, André Pirard wrote: Hi, I've tried to no avail those keywords for what I suppose you understand what I mean. A man doing his business of delivering fuel with his lorry in addition to his amenity=fuel. All the results I've got were pipelines (of course ;-)

Re: [Tagging] domestic fuel transport delivery мазут

2015-03-08 Thread André Pirard
On 2015-03-08 22:47, Philip Barnes wrote : On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 14:47 +0100, André Pirard wrote: Hi, I've tried to no avail those keywords for what I suppose you understand what I mean. A man doing his business of delivering fuel with his lorry in addition to his amenity=fuel. All the

Re: [Tagging] domestic fuel transport delivery мазут

2015-03-08 Thread johnw
maybe there needs to be a delivery= or onsite= tag for shops. I was a computer technician that had a “shop” (my garage) but I did a majority of the work onsite - meaning I came to you. There are also restaurants that are takeout or to-go only, I didn't check to see if there is a tag for that

Re: [Tagging] Proposed: landuse=civic_admin - looking for comments.

2015-03-08 Thread johnw
current draft definition: A new landuse http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:landuse=* value for civil government buildings complexes where citizens or services for citizens are managed. This includes legislative and executive centers, as well as administrative offices for government

[Tagging] domestic fuel transport delivery мазут

2015-03-08 Thread André Pirard
Hi, I've tried to no avail those keywords for what I suppose you understand what I mean. A man doing his business of delivering fuel with his lorry in addition to his amenity=fuel. All the results I've got were pipelines (of course;-) ), humanitarian, and foreign countries as usually called

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reception Desk

2015-03-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 08.03.2015 um 00:51 schrieb Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de: It should be found because OSM is a geographical database and the reception, or the multiple receptions as you asked before, is/are contained in the campus of the facility. So bascially most of the time you would just tag

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reception Desk

2015-03-08 Thread Kotya Karapetyan
Also I believe most of the time you'll be more interested in the entrance, the reception desk will very likely be close to it. On our campus, we have a couple of dozens of entrances for employees but only three of four receptions where a non-employee can enter. So mapping a reception

Re: [Tagging] Proposed: landuse=civic_admin - looking for comments.

2015-03-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 07.03.2015 um 11:00 schrieb johnw jo...@mac.com: if you think Judicial should be included in civic_admin, I will add it into the proposal. actually I m more inclined to distinguish between executive and legislative functions but agree that there might be some overlap sometimes,

Re: [Tagging] Draft Proposed Relationship Area Steps

2015-03-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 05.03.2015 um 23:14 schrieb Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com: On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 5:47 AM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote: would do it like this: http://i.imgur.com/GWF7StZ.png That's dramatically better. I like the idea too .. very nice Janko. How would you know which

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reception Desk

2015-03-08 Thread johnw
You really don't care for the tagging group much, do you? The way I search for a relevant tag is to use the wiki, not taginfo. I suspect many mappers do the same. Using a tag that is not on the wiki will probably mean it is not rendered.. thus I may have wasted my effort. By waving

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Reception Desk

2015-03-08 Thread Andreas Goss
Why do you even bother with a proposal when you bascially don't care about tagging? If you want to tag reception_desks in whatever random way then just go ahead and do it. Then people will see what you used on taginfo when looking for reception and at some point you just make a wiki page with

Re: [Tagging] route=foot

2015-03-08 Thread fly
In my area, the symbols and corresponding network are the same despite leading across completely paved tracks or following small, steep and muddy paths. How would you describe the differences and how do you handle mixed cases ? All the attributes can be obtained from the tags of the ways and the

Re: [Tagging] route=foot

2015-03-08 Thread Philip Barnes
On Wed, 2015-03-04 at 14:48 +1100, Steve Bennett wrote: Huh. And here in Australia (well, at least amongst the people I know) the difference between a hike and any other form of walking is strictly whether it's more than one day. A daywalk is, well, a day or less, and a hike is two or more