Re: [Tagging] That stupid 'quarter' tag has been approved

2012-06-02 Thread Russ Nelson
Steve Bennett writes: On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote: So? The wiki is the place for documenting how YOU map, not how other people SHOULD map. The only thing you SHOULDN'T do in the wiki is change the description of how other people map. C'mon

Re: [Tagging] The wiki (was Re: That stupid 'quarter' tag has been approved)

2012-06-02 Thread Russ Nelson
Steve Bennett writes: Again, I'm surprised this discussion needs to be had, but there is clearly very poor shared understanding of what the wiki is for and how to use it. It seems obvious to me that the wiki is to document *shared* understanding of mapping standards. I think you have that

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Railway start and end dates?

2012-05-27 Thread Russ Nelson
Nathan Edgars II writes: I'm considering using http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:start_date and end_date for some railways, but there seems to be too much ambiguity. First, if it's now a highway=*, I'd use start_date:railway for when the line opened. But on a railway=disused,

Re: [Tagging] [Talk-us] Railway start and end dates?

2012-05-27 Thread Russ Nelson
Nathan Edgars II writes: Why when the tracks were removed? What if a bridge was washed out and the tracks beyond were left to rust? What about (say) the Brooklyn Cooperage line out of St. Regis Falls? It was lain, torn up supposedly for good, and laid down again. start_date1 and

Re: [Tagging] That stupid 'quarter' tag has been approved

2012-05-27 Thread Russ Nelson
Nathan Edgars II writes: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/place%3Dquarter#Voting_result So? The wiki is the place for documenting how YOU map, not how other people SHOULD map. The only thing you SHOULDN'T do in the wiki is change the description of how other people map. --

Re: [Tagging] unfinished railway of historic importance

2012-03-04 Thread Russ Nelson
Frederik Ramm writes: Hi, On 02/25/12 01:23, Richard Welty wrote: how do you tag a never-completed railway which has significant important landmark value in the current landscape? I think that what you are seeing is not a railway at all. You're kidding, right? If you google

[Tagging] unfinished railway of historic importance

2012-02-25 Thread Russ Nelson
On 2/25/2012 09:15:48 NE2 wrote: Russ (and I) simply use railway=abandoned for this, with a note explaining the details. For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/2021550 (needs a bit of work). I do?? Last I knew, I tagged them railway=unfinished, and you unilaterally

[Tagging] unfinished railway of historic importance

2012-02-25 Thread Russ Nelson
On 2/25/2012 07:07:12 Steve Bennett wrote: IMHO there is not much difference between a almost completed then abandoned and completed then abandoned railway, from the perspective of OSM. When I'm out in the field chasing an unfinished railroad, it matters very much. You see, unfinished