On 15.04.2015 11:54, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
People put building=* on any structure
+1, and I am fine with it, just wanted to comment on not all tanks are
buildings and point out that in OSM all structures are buildings.
Bridges? Masts? Fences? Rails? Flagpoles? Power lines?
Maybe
Am 17.04.2015 um 17:40 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:
Bridges? Masts? Fences? Rails? Flagpoles? Power lines?
Maybe everything that looks like a building, smells like a building and
behaves like a building, but not all structures.
bridges yes, the others not, see here for a
2015-04-15 6:15 GMT+02:00 johnw jo...@mac.com:
we have building=farm_auxiliary, shed, and roof, so I think it is broader
than the german definition.
please note I wrote _also_ in the German definition, the English definition
is the same.
People put building=* on any structure
+1, and
A building=storage_tank only tells you what the building looks like from
the outside, and what was it's first purpose. It could very well be an
interesting hotel.
uto, 14. tra 2015. 07:45 Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us je napisao:
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Mateusz Konieczny
Sorry, I thought about using man_made=storage tank and in addition
building=storage_tank (rather than mentioned building=yes).
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 22:43:18 -0700
Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
That ship has sailed. man_made=storage_tank is the standard. Maybe
early on it should
2015-04-14 7:20 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
I think that building=storage_tank would be even better.
you can use both. Building is about a building typology, while man_made is
about a function.
___
Tagging mailing list
Am 14.04.2015 um 11:34 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2015-04-14 7:20 GMT+02:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
I think that building=storage_tank would be even better.
you can use both. Building is about a building typology, while man_made is
about a function.
+1
and not every
Am 14.04.2015 um 13:05 schrieb fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
and not every storage_tank might be a building.
well, this is another question. Strictly, most of them are not buildings, they
are almost all structures, but OSM seems not to use this technical distinction.
Technically,
On Apr 15, 2015, at 1:47 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Technically, buildings are a subset of man made structures, built for humans
occupancy, btw also under German law (de: Gebäude vs bauliche Anlagen).
we have building=farm_auxiliary, shed, and roof, so I think it
On the other hand, there are thousands of man_made=storage_tank without a
building tag.
A rendering engine could make the building implicit. Or a mechanical
retag could add the building tag.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
For your inspection, upgrade of:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank
To defacto status on the wiki (as it has 100,000 uses).
Note the German page has always asked for building=yes on this feature,
which
strikes me as both reasonable and a rendering hack.
I think that building=storage_tank would be even better.
On Mon, 13 Apr 2015 17:54:56 -0700
Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
For your inspection, upgrade of:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dstorage_tank
To defacto status on the wiki (as it has 100,000 uses).
Note
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com
wrote:
I think that building=storage_tank would be even better.
That ship has sailed. man_made=storage_tank is the standard. Maybe early on
it should have been man_made=building, building=* but we have an accepted
13 matches
Mail list logo
