For me, it looks like a bicycle-lane. On first look with no sign, so i
would tag it cycleway=lane + bicycle=yes (- no designated or official,
because a OSM-cycleway is for me a way, that is made for cycling (with
no implied access), access can be added with bicycle=*).
But on second look
On 4/18/2012 9:34 AM, Masi Master wrote:
For me, it looks like a bicycle-lane. On first look with no sign, so i
would tag it cycleway=lane + bicycle=yes (- no designated or official,
because a OSM-cycleway is for me a way, that is made for cycling (with
no implied access), access can be added
I'm wondering what the best way would be to tag a good-quality shoulder
that acts essentially as an undesignated bike lane, in that you can use
it but it is not required. Current Florida DOT policy is to use these on
rural roads, with marked bike lanes only when there is a lane to the
right.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
One regional mapper uses cycleway=shoulder for this, but I see that as
sub-optimal, since it's primarily a shoulder, not a cycleway. It would be
like putting cycleway=sidewalk whenever there's a smooth paved sidewalk.
