On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Sebastian Klein
basti...@googlemail.com wrote:
from what I understand, landuse is to mark a larger area that has multiple
I think it's useful to differentiate/subdivide areas where there are
noticeable changes in landuse: don't be too enthusiastic about lumping
2010/8/15 Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Sebastian Klein
basti...@googlemail.com wrote:
from what I understand, landuse is to mark a larger area that has multiple
I think it's useful to differentiate/subdivide areas where there are
On 15/08/2010 10:58, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
For city centres with mixed use I proposed once
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/centre_zone
but actually I think now that it might be better to have landuse=mixed
for mixed landuses (especially if the mix is within the same
On 15 August 2010 21:56, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I thought the accepted way was to separate the different uses with a
semi-colon:
landuse=residential;commercial etc.
Does anything actually parse multiple values like that?
___
Tagging
On Sunday 15 August 2010 14:28:15 John Smith wrote:
On 15 August 2010 21:56, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I thought the accepted way was to separate the different uses with a
semi-colon:
landuse=residential;commercial etc.
Does anything actually parse multiple values like that?
On 16 August 2010 01:43, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Sunday 15 August 2010 14:28:15 John Smith wrote:
On 15 August 2010 21:56, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I thought the accepted way was to separate the different uses with a
semi-colon:
landuse=residential;commercial
On 16 August 2010 01:43, Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
With landuse=mixed you basically know nothing, except that there should be
multiple values. You don't even know if it is a build-up area as there are
enough landuse values that deal with the countryside.
+1 I don't think landuse=mixed
2010/8/15 Cartinus carti...@xs4all.nl:
With landuse=mixed you basically know nothing, except that there should be
multiple values. You don't even know if it is a build-up area as there are
enough landuse values that deal with the countryside.
IMHO mixed landuse is neither residential or
On 15/08/2010 17:54, John Smith wrote:
On 16 August 2010 01:43, Cartinuscarti...@xs4all.nl wrote:
With landuse=mixed you basically know nothing, except that there should be
multiple values. You don't even know if it is a build-up area as there are
enough landuse values that deal with the
2010/8/15 Vincent Pottier vpott...@gmail.com:
During the preparation of the big import of CLC [1], we have got the two
codes 1.1.1 (Continuous urban fabric) and 1.1.2 (Discontinuous urban
fabric). We have mixed them on the same tag landuse=residential.
didn't you use a subtag for
On 15/08/2010 18:54, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
didn't you use a subtag for continuous/discontinuous? Could have been helpful.
We have put the CLC:code tag in all polygons imported, so it is easy to
find them back.
But no sub tag.
For the polygons are often been modifyed from import, we
On 15 August 2010 03:21, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
tourism=theme_park renders on Mapnik; perhaps this should be changed
to amusement_park (is there really a difference other than marketing?)
If one already renders, why change it?
___
should be what we would use.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] other landuse values?
From :mailto:rwe...@averillpark.net
Date :Sat Aug 14 12:51:34 America/Chicago 2010
On 8/14/10 1:22 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 15 August 2010 03:21, Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com wrote
13 matches
Mail list logo
