what are people doing for this? the truck oriented access tags in the
wiki are oriented towards UK legal categories whereas i'm basically
looking at a simple sign that says no trucks. the wiki would have
me use
goods=no
hgv=no
whereas
truck=no
seems like a logical extension of the current
It might seem a silly question, but what's a truck? You're correct that
HGV in the UK has a specific legal meaning*, but does truck have one
in the US?
If it doesn't, would something like a Ford F-series count? What
something like an El Camino?
Cheers,
Andy
* Westminster Council via
On 11/19/10 8:27 AM, SomeoneElse wrote:
It might seem a silly question, but what's a truck? You're correct
that HGV in the UK has a specific legal meaning*, but does truck
have one in the US?
If it doesn't, would something like a Ford F-series count? What
something like an El Camino?
On 19/11/2010 13:40, Richard Welty wrote:
On 11/19/10 8:27 AM, SomeoneElse wrote:
It might seem a silly question, but what's a truck? You're correct
that HGV in the UK has a specific legal meaning*, but does truck
have one in the US?
If it doesn't, would something like a Ford F-series
HGV = Heavy Goods Vehicle. It seems to be broadly identical (give or
take a couple of tons/tonnes) with a US truck
so hgv=destination (or hgv=no) would seem to be correct
Feel free to add a note on the wiki that hgv is en-gb for truck
Or feel free to use truck=destination (or truck=no), and if
2010/11/19 SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk:
From memory in the Western US I've seen no trucks and then in smaller
writing over 6 tons or similar. Some kind of note about what the local
rules are likely to be (or something explicit, if it's explicit). I'm sure
other people can suggest
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:47 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
The hgv-class is defined for vehicles over 3.5 t, if your legislation
has different weight limits I'd suggest to introduce a different
value/key and document that on the access-page in the wiki.
No, why ? If
On 19 Nov 2010, at 8:58 , Pieren wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:47 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
The hgv-class is defined for vehicles over 3.5 t, if your legislation
has different weight limits I'd suggest to introduce a different
value/key and document that on
around.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] tagging no truck access in US
From :mailto:ascho...@gmail.com
Date :Fri Nov 19 11:25:38 America/Chicago 2010
On 19 Nov 2010, at 8:58 , Pieren wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 3:47 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
On 11/19/2010 07:40 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
also truck prohibitions are not
intended to prevent
lawn services, delivery services (UPS, Fedex, the guy with the new
refrigerator) and
the like from carrying out normal business.
This is true only if the Except Local Deliveries or similar add-on
2010/11/19 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
The hgv-class is defined for vehicles over 3.5 t, if your legislation
has different weight limits I'd suggest to introduce a different
value/key and document that on the access-page in the wiki.
No, why ? If the min/max weight is different, then improve
On 11/19/10 1:25 PM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
I agree that it makes more sense to have a separate tag for the weight limit.
I would also not be surprised to find certain roads forbidden to trucks over a
certain length, or forbidding trucks with tandem trailers, because the road in
question
On 11/19/10 2:47 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On 11/19/2010 07:40 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
also truck prohibitions are not
intended to prevent
lawn services, delivery services (UPS, Fedex, the guy with the new
refrigerator) and
the like from carrying out normal business.
This is true only if the
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 11/19/10 1:25 PM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
I agree that it makes more sense to have a separate tag for the weight
limit. I would also not be surprised to find certain roads forbidden to
trucks over a certain
On 11/19/2010 06:20 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Richard Welty
rwelty-Fu78d/dmhrmzesifbgk...@public.gmane.org wrote:
On 11/19/10 1:25 PM, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
I agree that it makes more sense to have a separate tag for the weight
limit. I would also
15 matches
Mail list logo
