Should we be tagging where it's allowed or where it's not allowed or
where it's signed specifically one way or the other?
Only where it's signed.
--
Cheers
Ross
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
The right long term solution for this stuff is to use country-specific
tags, (eg, in australia we could use amenity=ses_station or
something), and to centrally define (in machine-readable terms) what
those country-specific tags are. But I think we're a fair way from
being able to implement
Actually we could do both, we could add emergency=* tags to existing
POIs without any problems as far as I know, and in future remove the
old amenity tag.
I think this is a better option.
Just need to make sure that a date is set to remove the old amenity tags.
--
Cheers
Ross
On 29 July 2010 19:15, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Just need to make sure that a date is set to remove the old amenity tags.
What would a reasonable time frame be?
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http
Better yet - just don't change it. This sort of change just isn't
worth the pain and hundreds of developer hours that could be better
spent on moving the project forward. Yes - this sort of change might
make the tag heirachy prettier - but not enough to justify the work.
Garbage.
It's not
Well done. Pretty much none of the others do. I look forward to your
patches :)
Heres the patch for the default.style for osm2pgsql
node,way emergency text nocache,polygon
Wasn't worth a diff patch as it's only one line. (30 seconds)
Mapnik for instance has manual rules -
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:05:19 +0100
Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 July 2010 16:26, Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com wrote:
Total time 6 minutes
Hundreds of hours, yeah right.
The program I've been talking about uses osm2pgsql and mapnik so I'm well
aware
I just don't see an ambulance/fire station as an emergency. I mean, if
you fall down and injure yourself you don't try get to the station you
'phone up get an ambulance to come to you.
The suggestion is to have fire, police and ambulance as emergency.
--
Cheers
Ross
Work out why it doesn't appear (5 min - your patch is actually very
slightly wrong btw, can you spot your mistake?)
Spotted my friday afternoon coding did you. Glad to see someones on the ball!!
However the above is just for fun - lets replace my original statement
with 'a lot of time' and
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:30:26 -0700
Michael Barabanov michael.baraba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
How would one tag a turn restriction (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Turn_restrictions) which is active say
6-9AM and 3-6PM every day? hour_on/hour_off seem to only be sufficient for
one time
On Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:04:21 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 August 2010 17:44, Sebastian Klein basti...@googlemail.com wrote:
Michael Barabanov wrote:
Seems like double work to me. Ross's suggestion may just work. If
there're no objections, I'll update the
Well, I will take a change to 'troll' again about it. This discussion
comes up again and again because we don't have:
a) clear tagging guidelines (*not* rules)
b) mechanism to replace tags
Agree totally.
This (b) would be easily recitified by normalising the database in regards to
tags.
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 10:03:42 +0200
Ulf Lamping ulf.lamp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 24.08.2010 09:36, schrieb Ross Scanlon:
Well, I will take a change to 'troll' again about it. This discussion
comes up again and again because we don't have:
a) clear tagging guidelines (*not* rules)
b
You may also want to have a read of this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Database_normalization
--
Cheers
Ross
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Typical.
NFI about database use so you resort to slinging mud.
I have a significant idea about how osm works as I have to integrate it
into programs I write or contribute to.
If the database was normalised then I'd have a reduction of about 1000
lines of code in one program
On Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:04:09 -0400
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
There doesn't seem to be a tag on the wiki for either handicapped
parking spots in a larger lot or a dedicated handicapped lot.
amenity=parking
capacity:disabled=yes or number of spaces.
It's on the wiki:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 4:10 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
a) you will add a note or FIXME to express this to the following
mapper. At least you have a 50% chance that it is already right.
Perhaps you can explain how I or anyone else will determine the
direction
On 06/03/12 03:32, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 03/05/2012 08:12 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lanes_and_complex_intersections_visual_approach
User Cmuelle8 insists on adding it to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lane_tagging_comparison#A_visual_approach
In one case there is a road where a two way section comes to a divider
and becomes two one way sections for a while. The suggested route came
along one of the one way sections, then turned about 340 degrees to go
down the other side of the road. It may be legal to do a u-turn there,
but I don't
No. The router should know not to do this. Likewise as below the router
should not make u turns at traffic lights.
Based on what? How does the router know that the two ways are two
carriageways of a single road? Couldn't they be a straight road, that
becomes a oneway street at a certain point,
This is the aerial imagery of the area the original poster is talking about:
https://binged.it/2kN1tfC
To all intents it could be a park.
In osm it's at:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/370388062#map=17/-38.15997/145.20073
Cheers
Ross
On 08/02/17 19:51, Dave Swarthout wrote:
Yes, I see
an educated guess. His
changeset comment suggests he has also added some "pipeline reserves"
although a quick look doesn't turn any up.
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 5:44 PM, Ross Scanlon <i...@4x4falcon.com
<mailto:i...@4x4falcon.com>> wrote:
This is the aerial imagery of the ar
22 matches
Mail list logo
