Re: [Tagging] access agricultural, WAS Re: Reviving the conditions debate

2012-06-16 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2012/6/15 Flaimo fla...@gmail.com: How can we resolve this? It seems obvious that we need either 2 tags for agricultural (according to the legislation, either a vehicle class or a use case is intended), or we accept that the same tag has different meanings in different legislations/countries.

[Tagging] access agricultural, WAS Re: Reviving the conditions debate

2012-06-15 Thread Flaimo
Message: 4 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 16:45:28 +0200 From: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools        tagging@openstreetmap.org Subject: [Tagging] access agricultural, WAS Re:  Reviving the        conditions debate Message-ID

Re: [Tagging] access agricultural, WAS Re: Reviving the conditions debate

2012-06-15 Thread Eckhart Wörner
Am Freitag, 15. Juni 2012, 09:32:11 schrieb Flaimo: very easy. use the 1.5 proposal :-). for germany you could use access:motorizedagricultural=yes. in developing countries, where motor vehicles are not common for most people, you could just use the role: access:agricultural=yes. That is the

[Tagging] access agricultural, WAS Re: Reviving the conditions debate

2012-06-14 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2012/6/14 Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk: The other usage of the term agricultural is the type of vehicle. In the UK agricultural vehicles are prohibited on motorways due to their slow speeds. But a farmer could use his Land Rover on a motorway as it is a car being used for agriculture.