Ceki Gülcü wrote:
Hi James,
At 14:50 13.07.2001 +0100, James Strachan wrote:
Hi Ceki
From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
FYI, Jochen Hiller has written logs tags based on log4j. The code seems
pretty complete but I am not necessarily a good judge. I have also
noticed
Hi Ceki
From: Ceki Gülcü [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I understand correctly, http://www.adjacency.org/logtags.jsp is
no longer pertinent...
Yes, thats Joe's original taglib. The log taglib at jakarta-taglibs
supercedes that one.
Whatever you deem most appropriate is fine with me. IMHO,
Hi Ceki
From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
FYI, Jochen Hiller has written logs tags based on log4j. The code seems
pretty complete but I am not necessarily a good judge. I have also
noticed his code resides under the org.apache.log4j.taglib namespace
which hints that the code may
Hi James,
At 14:50 13.07.2001 +0100, James Strachan wrote:
Hi Ceki
From: Ceki Gülcü [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
FYI, Jochen Hiller has written logs tags based on log4j. The code seems
pretty complete but I am not necessarily a good judge. I have also
noticed his code resides under the
]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jochen Hiller)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ceki Gülcüxj/A== [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Taglibs, log tags for log4j
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 10:33:36 +0200
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance
