On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 4:41 AM, Joseph Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we get a vague show of hands about what people think of this? I
+1 for the wikipedia version. http://cr.yp.to/publicdomain.html
___
legal-talk mailing list
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Rob Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Wikipedia version is the best current PD Dedication but I really
would recommend waiting on CC Zero.
CC Zero explicitly mentions database rights, which I think is a good thing,
but I would be ahppy with the Wikipedia
We won't have all the data under one license though. Never will if
we're incorporating TIGER data and data from other governments.
I don't think its that big a deal - we could just say if you edit a
node, your edits are also under the same PD license as the node is
currently under or something.
Joseph Gentle wrote:
We won't have all the data under one license though. Never will if
we're incorporating TIGER data and data from other governments.
Yeah you will - a single PD disclaimer of rights (PDDL, CC0,
Wikipedia-like, WTFPL, doesn't really matter), with an
attribution/disclaimer
What about a yahoo discussin group for OSM-PD? Would anyone object to that?
Landon
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
Does anyone have the e-mail address for Tom Hughes so I could request
the creation of a public domain mailing list
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 02:17:46AM +1100, Joseph Gentle wrote:
We won't have all the data under one license though. Never will if
we're incorporating TIGER data and data from other governments.
Exactly, the point to keep in mind here is that you don’t relicense
stuff (at least not without much
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:19:50PM +0100, Brian Quinion wrote:
Personally I'd be very happy to see the discussion of PD continue on
the talk list but a mailing list seems a very minor resource compared
to the time and effort that have gone into the creating the new
license.
I see the PD route
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Simon Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:19:50PM +0100, Brian Quinion wrote:
Personally I'd be very happy to see the discussion of PD continue on
the talk list but a mailing list seems a very minor resource compared
to the time and effort
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:17:35AM +1100, Joseph Gentle wrote:
I intended to have an overlay on my map which showed bus stops. This
data would be collected from the local bus company.
Under the old license, I couldn't use OSM because I couldn't share the
overlay. It might not have been a
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Ian Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why can't we just be happen to produce maps and data people will want to
use?
Ian.
We already produce maps and data people want to use.
I also want the maps and data to be under a license which lets them be
used. (More.)
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 1:44 AM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
80n wrote:
IMHO, PD weakens OSM and weakens its ability to free up other datasets.
I don't see the ability to free up other datasets as central to OSM,
and as such, weakening this ability does not IMHO weaken OSM.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:06 PM, 80n [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I like so view OSM as a cool DIY project, not a political trick we're
pulling.
The problem with PD is that it permits companies to take OSM data, add their
own data and benefit from result without giving anything back. Joseph's
Exactly. I wouldn't like to see nodes with a license tag. Once again, it
over-complicates things. Or do you want people asking, which PD data can
they use and which they cannot??
Importing PD data (such as TIGER) into OSM/PD isn't a problem. PD is PD.
I vote for the Wikipedia PD style of public
It would be useful if there were some common mapping scenarios in the wiki, as
a library of examples of common problems encountered and their efficient
solution, almost like a story rather than a tag dictionary. This could include
information like:
* the way the data was captured (type of GPS
Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
On Mon, October 20, 2008 10:52, Valent Turkovic wrote:
Are there any applications (on linux preferably) that use
OpenStreetMap maps and give standard GPS routing functions like
commercial car GPS units?
Navit, GPSdrive, gosmore. You can also put OSM data into just
I am also thinking about renaming the page altogether. There is simply
no room for the word deprecated here. I'm just unsure about the new
name. Old features? Older features?
I dosn't like the world deprecated too.
But I guess there should be a mechanism, to show the users which tags
are
Do you actually have that working? I use mkgmap-r659 a Garmin Vista
(HCx) and I see no routing - it insists on using the base map. I did see
a mention of this some time back, but assumed it was 'coming' - it
certainly hasn't made it to my setup!
I use Garmin img from
Hi List
I have roads already calcified based on OSM in Postgis or Shapefiles. How
can I get this data into OSM?
Andre
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
hi
this is Sergio Sevillano aka User:Sergionaranja
sorry for the inconveniences.
I think I have behave correctly though...
I wanted to have linear barriers in use, so I found the barrier proposal
which was the best option for it, and i promoted it along with other
users to be approved as it
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The real question to ask here is what the clean-up is meant to
achieve? Especially when the new tag does not really interfere with
the old tag, what does forcibly removing the old
Matthias Julius wrote:
IMHO, if someone has the authority to put something on Map Features
someone also has the authority to change or remove something or mark
it as deprecated.
Let me disagree. You are implying that just because I can add stuff to
map features, I can also decide to mark all
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 7:39 AM, Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Valent Turkovic wrote:
I would be really thankful if anyone can check it the packages are the
same on debian based distros and or does apt-get need to have some
other named packages.
I would like to update my blog so that
Joseph Gentle wrote:
Can we get a vague show of hands about what people think of this? I
don't think its worth discussing for more than a day or so. If this
issue is too contentious, we can let contributors decide with an
option on their user page or something.
+1 wikipedia version
If you
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 9:44 PM, vegard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:27:27PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 09:43 +0200, vegard wrote:
I see it like this: What could be very useful to have, is a mapping
between tiger data (old set) and OSM data. It
Hi Andre,
I have roads already calcified based on OSM in Postgis or Shapefiles. How
can I get this data into OSM?
Try osmosis, http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Osmosis.
Rapahel
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Mark Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you actually have that working? I use mkgmap-r659 a Garmin Vista
(HCx) and I see no routing - it insists on using the base map. I did see
a mention of this some time back, but assumed it was 'coming' - it
certainly
Hi all,
I would like to add the tag alt_name in the Map Features wiki page.
I discovered this tag in a mail from David Earl ([1]) sometime ago but
I don't think that many people are reading the ML archives.
I also don't think that a vote is required here because the tag seems
obvious for me. But
Hi Farzaneh,
I'll be bringing two of the OSM GPS units for loan (in addition to my own)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Gps_units
But I also am pretty sure there will be some more brought from the
same collection in Manchester, so don't worry! :-)
Cheers,
Tim
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at
http://emexes.powweb.com/osm/ +1 from me. Works perfectly in my Garmin Legend
CX, and calculates routes in sane timescales - circa 10-15 secs or so.
PHILLIP BARNETT
SERVER MANAGER
200 GRAY'S INN ROAD
LONDON
WC1X 8XZ
UNITED KINGDOM
T +44 (0)20 7430 4474
F
E [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Sergio,
also followed the http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/
Proposed_features#Post-vote_clean-up
wich clearly mentions the Add entry to Map_Features page.
Which is ok (I think you mixed up things by adding the barrier=*
under the highway=* section but I fixed that).
It doesn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Amos wrote:
On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Iván Sánchez Ortega
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having seen the 11Mb video, I'd appreciate to have the 37Mb original. I'll
play it in a conference in one month, and people should be able to at least
Jamie
You should try to get the one that was also shown at SOTM08 - of folk out
mapping at Birmingham mapping party.
Don't know where it is. Done by Nick Black's brother Tom. He has a blog/contact
at:
http://osmdoc.wordpress.com/about/
Else perhaps Nick can point to it.
Cheers
STEVE
Steve
Hi all,
I've enjoyed the feedback from mappers on my best campus post from a
little while back. http://weait.com/bestcampus
So let's turn this in to a friendly little competition for OSM maps of
campuses. See the announcement here. We'll have the call for nominees
shortly and a cut-off date
I have no problem avoiding the moral rights quagmire. I think
simplicity is one of the reasons to move to PD in the first place.
I don't think it would be a problem to use the wikipedia public domain
license now, and then consider a future move to something like the CC
Zero.
I would strongly
What about doing a hack of code_swarm in order to show the contribs to the
osm project
(http://vis.cs.ucdavis.edu/~ogawa/codeswarm/)
--
Steven Le Roux
Jabber-ID : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
0x39494CCB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2FF7 226B 552E 4709 03F0 6281 72D7 A010 3949 4CCB
Does anyone have the e-mail address for Tom Hughes so I could request
the creation of a public domain mailing list for OSM? Is there a more
appropriate way to handle this request?
Thanks,
The Sunburned Surveyor
___
legal-talk mailing list
[EMAIL
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Robert (Jamie) Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have any other high-quality videos I could download and show
at UK Linux Expo? There's a few on YouTube, which I could rip with
KeepVid.com, but it would be better to get higher quality originals
Tom,
Many OSM contributors indicated that they are interested in a PD alternative
(Richard, Frederik, myself etc). I believe that having a PD database
(subset) many have a few applications. Like showcasing OSM on website where
a viral license will be an issue. Google Earth etc.
We all want to
Hi,
Tom Hughes wrote:
I'm not hard to find... I'm also not the right person to create mailing
lists now though ;-) You want Mike Collinson for that.
Good to know, I've been sending people your way all the time ;-)
Is this PD thing actually OSM though, or something outside of/parallel
to
Nic Roets wrote:
Many OSM contributors indicated that they are interested in a PD
alternative (Richard, Frederik, myself etc). I believe that having a PD
database (subset) many have a few applications. Like showcasing OSM on
website where a viral license will be an issue. Google Earth etc.
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 14:37:29 Stefan Monnier wrote:
Regarding street numbers: I'm very interested in adding them (as it so
happens, I noticed their lack when looking for specific direction in
Buenos Aires where indeed the block number is often used instead of the
cross-street) and find
Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Map Features is a documentation of what is used, not of what someone
thinks should be used.
The first paragraph on Map Features says it is a core recommended
feature set and corresponding tags, and to me a recommendation is
something that should be
Tom,
You wrote: No, but some of us are trying to work to achieve the best consensus
possible within the existing project while others appear to be trying to
fragment the project.
I don't think there has been a decision by any of us to fork OSM or
to fragment the community. I believe there is a
Well, as Frederik noted in the other thread, keeping it low key is best. I'm
thinking parallel database running the same toolchain. No tools for
automatically propagating to the main database.
I'm not trying to fragment the project and I'm hoping no-one else is. I'm
trying to maximize the value
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
Nothing is ever as simple as you hope. :]
Joseph wrote: I don't think its that big a deal - we could just say
if you edit a
node, your edits are also under the same PD license as the node is
currently under or
I've taken the step of creating a Yahoo Group so we can continue
discussions about OSM-PD:
http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/osmpd/
I invite all who are interested to join the group so they can
participate in the discussion. I've set up the group so that I need to
approve members before they
I think the concerns about fragmenting OSM are valid. The problem with
two databases and two toolchains is that you've just cut the
collaborative power of OSM in half. I really think a situation in
which all OSM users get to benefit from the PD data will be best. This
will really make the whole
Back to square 1. :]
Is public domain really this hard?
The Sunburned Surveyor
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Rob Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
Nothing is ever as simple as you hope. :]
Joseph wrote: I don't
Tom Hughes wrote:
We all want to improve OSM data quantity and quality. We just haven't
agreed on weather a viral license will help or hinder. Just like we
haven't agreed on JOSM vs. Potlatch.
No, but some of us are trying to work to achieve the best consensus
possible within the existing
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 02:34:39PM -0400, Matthias Julius wrote:
I also think it is confusing if two equivalent tags are recommended
for the same thing. If by whatever process it is determined that a
new wah of tagging gates is recommended the old tag should point to
the new one with the
Hi,
vegard wrote:
I agree. this democracy and meritocracy thing is good for something, but
for the map to be really useful as a *world* map and not separated
islands,
Is it really so important for the map to look the same in Chile and in
China?
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail
Hi,
We have no mechanism to divide good from bad ideas. If you start
putting your ideas about what you think is good and should be used on
Map Features, then I will start putting mine on there as well, and
everyone else. That's why we don't want to go down this road. (And
before anyone
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:11:14PM +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
vegard wrote:
I agree. this democracy and meritocracy thing is good for something, but
for the map to be really useful as a *world* map and not separated
islands,
Is it really so important for the map to look the same in
Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
We have no mechanism to divide good from bad ideas. If you start
putting your ideas about what you think is good and should be used on
Map Features, then I will start putting mine on there as well, and
everyone else. That's why we don't want to
Hi,
vegard wrote:
Is it really so important for the map to look the same in Chile and in
China?
Well. You have to remember that rendering is not all,
Ok, then: Is it really so important for routing software to work
identically in Chile and in China?
Look at it this way: How many Chinese
On Tuesday 21 October 2008, 20:56:58, Pieren did write:
I would like to add the tag alt_name in the Map Features wiki page.
I discovered this tag in a mail from David Earl ([1]) sometime ago but
I don't think that many people are reading the ML archives.
I also don't think that a vote is
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 02:06:55PM +0100, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
Does anyone have any other high-quality videos I could download and show
at UK Linux Expo?
I created animations for the Wales and Bradford mapping parties using
party render
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 10:54:52AM +0200, Sebastian Spaeth wrote:
Let me disagree. You are implying that just because I can add stuff to
map features, I can also decide to mark all highway=* as deprecated? I
think we should supercede highway=* with path=* because that makes so
much more sense.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:17:35AM +1100, Joseph Gentle wrote:
councils, proprietary satnav systems, google earth, etc. I don't think
I’d rather people didn’t make their stuff proprietary at all. PD
doesn’t encourage it, but doesn’t discourage it either. Share-alike
discourages it, and that’s
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 2:02 AM, Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this PD thing actually OSM though, or something outside of/parallel
to OSM? I don't quite understand at the moment how to whole thing is
intended to work to be honest.
We're still talking about it; hence the request for a
Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
vegard wrote:
Is it really so important for the map to look the same in Chile and in
China?
Well. You have to remember that rendering is not all,
Ok, then: Is it really so important for routing software to work
identically in Chile and in
Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use the turbogears widget for openlayers and I'm having
hard time figuring out how to point to openstreetmaps.org tiles.
One of the examples they have:
ol = WMS(name=OpenLayers WMS,
url=[http://labs.metacarta.com/wms/vmap0;],
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:56 PM, Grant Slater
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lukasz Szybalski wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use the turbogears widget for openlayers and I'm having
hard time figuring out how to point to openstreetmaps.org tiles.
One of the examples they have:
ol =
On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 22:58 -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can run it like this:
perl tiger-shp-to-osm.pl
data/ftp2.census.gov/geo/tiger/TIGER2007FE/41_OREGON/41055_Sherman/fe_2007_41055_edges.zip
out-dave.osm
Tristan Scott wrote the following on 20/10/2008 04:27:
I've modded the coastline here:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.7145lon=1.695zoom=14layers=0B00FTTT
And yet all I've done is move about 4 points in a bit, and add a
section of beach where I went for a walk. And now some of the new
Guys OSM isn't going PD... can't you go start
ReallyFreeAndOpenStreetMap.org or something?
Best
Steve
On 21 Oct 2008, at 07:33, Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
Does anyone have the e-mail address for Tom Hughes so I could request
the creation of a public domain mailing list for OSM? Is there a
er vielen me wat puntjes op toen ik gisteren weer eens naar m'n topo kaart
keek (grens rendering met admin_level=2)
- in groningen is iemand bezig geweest de grens op de kustlijn te zetten..
!?
- in duitsland is een vreemd stukje grens
- in zeeland mist een stukje grens met belgie, voorbereiding
Er klopt ook geen snars van die grenzen, die rare grenzen komen van de AND
data. In de verwarring tussen coastline en admin_level2 hebben mensen
(waaronder ik) de weg AND_c getagd als boundary maar dit is helemaal geen
grens, boven vlieland ging hij zelfs door de gemeente Vlieland. Maar de
enige
Dit lijkt me zeker niet vekeerd. Misschien handig om dit om meer dingen te te
gaan passen. i.e. gemeente grenzen?
Verder is het natuurlijk wachten totdat we de provincie data goed geimporteerd
hebben dan kunnen we het meteen goed doe.
--Roeland
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 12:08:48 Milo van der
Ha talk-nl,
Ik ben vanmiddag met Gert Gremmen bij NLNet geweest. Doel was tweeledig:
* Bijpraten over de stand van zaken aangaande de €15.000 subsidie die
zij ons hebben verleend voor de ontwikkeling van het OSM-
softwareplatform.
* Overdracht van de verantwoordelijkheid voor de coördinatie
On Tuesday 21 October 2008 11:39:14 Skywave wrote:
We zouden dit bestand kunnen importeren, maar dan zouden alle oude grenzen
er weer uit moeten, want veel grenzen zijn beschadigd in de loop van tijd.
+1
--
m.v.g.,
Cartinus
___
Talk-nl mailing list
hi guys =)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kim wrote:
I've been busy uploading traces and mapping around Mt Barker
and Littlehampton a bit lately. I have a couple of questions
I was hoping folks could clear up;
- Are the rail and road under passes right? I have set them as
tunnels, because it
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Diego Molla wrote:
[Some time ago I sent a similar email from a different email address
and I think it never made it to the group]
In a recent trip I was comparing Shonkymaps and OSM on my Garmin GPSr
and I saw that Shonkymaps displays a floating icon with the road
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
. A normal suburban roundabout should just be a circle (I use 8 corners)
with the 4 ways connected. Merkaartor has a roundabout tool where you click
a crossing, select the diameter of the roundabout and it creates a circle
with the ways cropped off
Hi.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Kim Hawtin [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
- My edits seem to be taking around two weeks to hit the OSM
normal map ... isn't this normally happening weekly?
You can force an update to the Osmarender layer so you can see if your edits
are OK. Updates generally
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Liz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
NH20 particularly bothers me.
Nowhere on the Sturt is there a current sign which says NH20.
It's 20 or A20 according to the state boundaries.
I'm sure others can point out great inconsistencies with other highways.
Can we decide
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
sample of highway markers - Mildura
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.1939lon=142.1734zoom=12layers=B000
FTF sample of highway markers - Renmark
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-34.2052lon=140.7778zoom=12layers=B000
FTF sample of highway markers
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at your B37 Alexandrina Flaxley Rd roundabout, you don't
need oneway=yes(it's implied), clockwise(just draw it in a clockwise
direction), ref(roundabout's don't inherit route numbers, it's for
when roundabout's have
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Darrin Smith wrote:
But not all sections of the road in one state have the same code (Sturt
Highway being exactly the case in point, it is NOT National A20 for the
last ~5km between Gepps Cross and Pooraka. I don't know about the case
around Mildura so I can't comment
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Darrin Smith wrote:
Of course, if it's a newer edit, especially if it's a change from the
correct data, string 'em up
that's what it is, because I did a lot of Hay in May
Or was that made Hay in May?
Liz
___
Talk-au mailing list
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 07:03:42 +1100
Liz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Darrin Smith wrote:
But not all sections of the road in one state have the same code
(Sturt Highway being exactly the case in point, it is NOT National
A20 for the last ~5km between Gepps Cross and
Darrin Smith wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at your B37 Alexandrina Flaxley Rd roundabout, you don't
need oneway=yes(it's implied), clockwise(just draw it in a clockwise
direction), ref(roundabout's don't inherit route numbers, it's for
On Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:40:49 +1030
Kim Hawtin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Darrin Smith wrote:
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looking at your B37 Alexandrina Flaxley Rd roundabout, you
don't need oneway=yes(it's implied), clockwise(just draw it in a
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
(edit) [EMAIL PROTECTED] [1011]
10/01/08 23:07:02 ce
modified a lot of icons, mainly transparent backgrounds, but also
changed pixels for improved readability. To achieve that, I
Am Montag, 20. Oktober 2008 22:35 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
ich dachte, is_in ist tot, d.h. sollte nicht mehr verwendet werden, da
redundante Daten, und die Probleme, für die es gedacht ist, kann man
anscheinend besser mit Grenzpolygonen lösen...
Ich denke: Tot gesagte leben länger. Es wäre
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 08:44:04AM +0200, Sven Anders wrote:
Am Montag, 20. Oktober 2008 22:35 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
ich dachte, is_in ist tot, d.h. sollte nicht mehr verwendet werden, da
redundante Daten, und die Probleme, für die es gedacht ist, kann man
anscheinend besser mit
Tobias Wendorff schrieb:
Marcus Wolschon schrieb:
ich sehe bisher nicht, daß mehr als das width-Tag
nötig sind um eine Straße als Fläche zu erfassen.
Nunja, neben der Straße sind dann noch so Informationen,
wie Bürgersteige etc.
... und Fahrspuren, und Barrieren entlang von Spuren.
Zum
Hallo!
Sven Geggus wrote:
Mario Salvini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
als was würde man eigenltich die Slums eintragen?
landuse=residential + highway=track/footway
oder highway=residential, surface=unpaved
Grüße, Alexander
___
Talk-de mailing
Hallo!
Mir ist aufgefallen, dass jemand die A14 in Sachsen, zwischen den
Anschlussstellen Döbeln-Nord und Leisnig kaputt gemacht hat. Der Fehler ist
hier deutlich zu sehen:
http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.1741lon=13.0601zoom=13layers=B000FTF
Eine Fahrtrichtung verläuft ein Stück absolut
Garry schrieb:
Wenn Du aber Flächen erfasst dann kannst Du niemals beide Strassenseiten
gleichzeitig mit dem gleichen Empfänger unter gleichen
Empfangsbedingungen aufzeichnen.
Die Straße als way soll natürlich nicht gelöscht werden, und kann nach
wie vor per GPS vermessen und fürs routing
Dominik Spies schrieb:
Grundsätzlich wäre link aber auch bei jeglich Ein- und Ausfahrten die
sich gabeln sinnvoll, und dass kann auch mal bei einer normalen
residential oder unclassified sein.
find ich gut.
Gruß Simon
___
Talk-de mailing list
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Lars Poeschel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 21.10.08 11:01:40
An: talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: [Talk-de] Änderungen rückgängig machen
Hallo!
Mir ist aufgefallen, dass jemand die A14 in Sachsen, zwischen den
Anschlussstellen Döbeln-Nord und Leisnig
Lars Poeschel schrieb:
Hallo!
Mir ist aufgefallen, dass jemand die A14 in Sachsen, zwischen den
Anschlussstellen Döbeln-Nord und Leisnig kaputt gemacht hat. Der Fehler ist
hier deutlich zu sehen:
http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.1741lon=13.0601zoom=13layers=B000FTF
Eine Fahrtrichtung
Thomas Drebert schrieb:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dirk-Lüder Kreie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 21.10.08 11:23:58
An: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] Änderungen rückgängig machen
Das kann jeder, und anscheinend hat es auch
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dirk-Lüder Kreie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: 21.10.08 11:23:58
An: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] Änderungen rückgängig machen
Das kann jeder, und anscheinend hat es auch schon jemand gemacht.
Am 21. Oktober 2008 11:10 schrieb Simon Kokolakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Die Straße als way soll natürlich nicht gelöscht werden, und kann nach
wie vor per GPS vermessen und fürs routing benutzt werden. Die Straßen
fläche per GPS zu vermessen ist natürlich sehr ungenau, aber hierzu kann
man ja
Am 21. Oktober 2008 09:28 schrieb Florian Lohoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Ich finde grenzpolygone noch schlechter als die bestehenden is_ins denn
der rechenaufwand um herauszufinden wo ein element sich befindet ist um
viele exponenten groesser bei sowas.
Genau andersherum.
Das durchsuchen der ganzen
Tim Krüger schrieb:
Aber du nimmst ja das Mittel an um die Mittellinie der Straße zu ziehen.
Wie willst Du das Mittel bilden, wenn Du die Range gar nicht kennst?
Außerdem weißt Du ja gar nicht, wo die Straßenmitte wirklich ist, weil
Du nicht weißt, ob Dein GPS-Gerät x Meter nach links oder x
Marcus Wolschon schrieb:
Selbst wenn wir sie hätten, unsere Nutzer haben nichts auch nur im
entferntesten
so genaues wenn sie unsere Daten nutzen.
Eure Nutzer oder die OSM-Community oder die Nutzer, die auf
OSM-Daten zurückgreifen könn(t)en?
___
Birgit Nietsch schrieb:
An sich ist das nichts kompliziertes, oder? Aber um das in Tags zu
stecken muss man derzeit eine Menge recherchieren und hat dann
immernoch offene Fragen: Das Absperrgitter? Die Busspuren einzeln
zeichnen? Eine oder zwei? Die KFZ-Spuren links und rechts davon
einzeln
1 - 100 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
