All
Our lawyer has had a chat with Jordan (the original author of the
ODbL). I spoke with Jordan this morning and he has a list of suggested
changes with explanations from our lawyer which he is reviewing.
I expect and hope this stage to be a simple review process before
taking the next
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:21:44PM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Another thing one could to if public messaging does not find favour is
posting a caveat immediately over the write message text area,
something along the lines of if you're about to criticize someone whom
you don't know, think
Kenneth Gonsalves schrieb:
hi,
how does one start/stop tracking in OSMTracker
In the released version it tracks as soon as a GPS is connected.
--
Dirk-Lüder Deelkar Kreie
Bremen - 53.0952°N 8.8652°E
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Simon Ward wrote:
There could always be a gentle reminder when reading messages that:
* There’s a wiki;
* there are several mailing lists
(with links, of course) where you can check and discuss things. You may
also want to have “report offensive message” (though that seems a bit
Hi,
Tom Hughes wrote:
I know this because the absolutely vast, exceedingly non gentle, four
language reminder about using the web site to reply rather than email is
ignored by large numbers of people every day.
That's a very clear sign that we did something wrong by implementing
half of
Hi,
We are having a discussion in talk-ph on tagging barangays:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ph/2008-November/000129.html
The old practice was to tag barangay as place=village. By definition
from the Map Features:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features#Places
The tag
- Original Message -
From: maning sambale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Talk Openstreetmap talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 9:10 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] Rendering barangays for the Philippines
Hi,
We are having a discussion in talk-ph on tagging barangays:
Hi all,
As of revison 12060 maplint supports
noname=yes for residential roads and POIs as well as
validate:empty-tag-value
validate:bridge-or-tunnel-without-layer
validate:motorway-without-ref
validate:place-of-worship-without-religion
validate:poi-without-name
As of revison 12060 maplint supports
(...)
to disable specific tests. If other variants (like unnamed=yes) or other
namespaces for annotations (like the internal namespace) show up
prominently enough I'll update maplint again to support those tags too.
I think, we, as validation tools
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a quick show of hands on the idea of making the
whole built-in OSM messaging system public (not retroactively of course,
but change it so that anyone can ready any message written in the
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Nic Roets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* When a person signs up to OSM, ask him a few multiple choice questions to
make sure he has the mastered the basics.
I think the barrier for entry for OSM is already too high, just
signing up probably deters a lot of useful
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:36 PM, David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course the correct way would be to tag them as place=barangay and
we will do so from now on. Can we request the renderers to render
them the same as place=village?
Or any other ideas?
Yes, keep tagging them as
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Nic Roets [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* When a person signs up to OSM, ask him a few multiple choice questions
to
make sure he has the mastered the basics.
I think the barrier
Hi,
to disable specific tests. If other variants (like unnamed=yes) or
other namespaces for annotations (like the internal namespace) show
up prominently enough I'll update maplint again to support those
tags too.
I think, we, as validation tools developpers/maintainer, have a
On 24/11/2008 14:46, Erik Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 12:36 PM, David Groom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course the correct way would be to tag them as place=barangay and
we will do so from now on. Can we request the renderers to render
them the same as place=village?
Or any
I don't understand the direction of this thread. Frederik is talking
about old users protecting their area agains newcomers, not about
new users making possible mistakes. This happens through
intimidation through the private messaging system.
I'm also against making everything public. As already
Um it sounds like we need a system to report abuse rather than just
making it public?
On 23 Nov 2008, at 13:21, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to ask for a quick show of hands on the idea of making
the
whole built-in OSM messaging system public (not retroactively of
course,
On 24/11/2008 15:41, SteveC wrote:
Um it sounds like we need a system to report abuse rather than just
making it public?
+1
If someone is being intimidated in private, how much more intimidating
would it be if done in public.
David
___
talk
On 24/11/2008 08:38, Tom Hughes wrote:
There could always be a gentle reminder when reading messages that:
* There’s a wiki;
* there are several mailing lists
I can tell you right now that a gentle reminder will have very little
effect.
I know this because the absolutely vast,
David Earl wrote:
If you send a message out from the website send-a-message with a random
token in it somewhere (e.g. reply-to:
token@privatemail.openstreetmap.com, or subject: bla bla [token], or
in the message-id, so you can see any reply is a reply to a web-site
originated message,
Hi Y'all,
In a state of sleep-deprived foolishness, I deleted a way (one half of
the Baltimore Washington Barkway just outside the Beltway near
Washington DC)...is there any way to undelete a way once the potlatch
change has been committed? Or should I just attempt to rebuild the way?
On 24/11/2008 16:14, Ben Supnik wrote:
Hi Y'all,
In a state of sleep-deprived foolishness, I deleted a way (one half of
the Baltimore Washington Barkway
That would be dog=yes?
just outside the Beltway near
Washington DC)...is there any way to undelete a way once the potlatch
change
I would like the see the messaging system open to the API, so that,
for example, you can directly message someone via an editor or
something about a particular map element. So mapping queries / advice
would be public, and accessible from multiple areas. This would be be
best suited to a public
For instance, the fact that maplint supports noname=yes and the
validation: namespace and maybe one day the internal: namespace I've
proposed is bad.
noname and validate are not really the same thing. noname say that
something does not have a name. The validate namespace is a lot more
I need your help please...
(Thank you to those of you who have started already before I'd even
finished preparing the page!)
While the name finder search currently does quite a good job of handling
nuances of names in different languages, it can't currently find
categories of things in
Patrick Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
noname and validate are not really the same thing. noname say that
something does not have a name. The validate namespace is a lot more
universal in its goal. It aims to create a namespace for the selective
disabling of all possible valiation tests.
Hi,
noname and validate are not really the same thing. noname say that
something does not have a name. The validate namespace is a lot more
universal in its goal.
Exact, but I was making a comparisson between
* higwhay=residential
* noname=yes
and
* higwhay=residential
*
Hi,
Patrick Kilian wrote:
validate:empty-tag-key
validate:empty-tag-value
validate:untagged-way
validate:bridge-or-tunnel-without-layer
validate:deprecated-tags
validate:motorway-without-ref
validate:place-of-worship-without-religion
validate:poi-without-name
Great !
Just one question : do we have to ignore accents ?
In french, you write pres, pres de for near. But the correct
syntax is près, près de.
Or do we have to write all possibilities pres, pres de, près, près de ?
Pieren
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 7:12 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
DavidD [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2008/11/22 Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Whatever the syntax is you won't know why someone chose not to include
a name tag. The here discussed proposal is only about telling the
validator not to complain about the missing tag. It is up to the
mapper
Hi,
DavidD wrote:
I don't really see why this is needed. Wouldn't it be a lot better to
have a tag for when a street has no visible name sign? Then I and
other mappers know what is going on and there is no risk of someone
with local knowledge thing the street is already named.
The idea is
On Monday 24 November 2008 20:01, Pieren wrote:
But the correct
syntax is près, près de.
Or do we have to write all possibilities pres, pres de, près, près de ?
Oops, I allready corrected some, and added some with accentuated caracters
--
Sylvain Letuffe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
qui suis-je :
Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Tom Hughes wrote:
I know this because the absolutely vast, exceedingly non gentle, four
language reminder about using the web site to reply rather than email is
ignored by large numbers of people every day.
That's a very clear sign that we
On Monday 24 November 2008, David Earl wrote:
I'm also reconsidering adding in as well as near (and comma) as
the separator. The problem is that there are a couple of place names
in England which have In in their names - Henley-In-Arden for
example. (A second problem is that since it works
On 24/11/2008 19:32, Ben Laenen wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008, David Earl wrote:
I'm also reconsidering adding in as well as near (and comma) as
the separator. The problem is that there are a couple of place names
in England which have In in their names - Henley-In-Arden for
example. (A
On 24/11/2008 19:01, Pieren wrote:
Great !
Just one question : do we have to ignore accents ?
In french, you write pres, pres de for near. But the correct
syntax is près, près de.
Or do we have to write all possibilities pres, pres de, près, près de ?
*With* the accents, only, please (the
Are there other applications that care whether something really does
not have a name or whether the name is just not know?
Yes, I see one. Someone might argue I am not of good faith, but anyway there
it is :
Suppose I'm working for a local urban institution and they ask me to replace
any
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a very clear sign that we did something wrong by implementing
half of an email system ;-) maybe we should drop that kind of user
messaging and just configure a mailer to forward
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to the appropriate
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:15 PM, Matt Amos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a very clear sign that we did something wrong by implementing
half of an email system ;-) maybe we should drop that kind of user
messaging and just
From my point of view internal=noname and noname=yes both tell me that
the street has no name. validate:residential-without-name=ignore tell's
the validator not to highlight the fact that there is no name.
Then we have the same definition.
But I want a _consistent_ way to do that for _all_
Hi,
From my point of view internal=noname and noname=yes both tell me that
the street has no name. validate:residential-without-name=ignore tell's
the validator not to highlight the fact that there is no name.
Then we have the same definition.
Good.
But I want a _consistent_ way to do that
If my solution isn't good it's not going to be used...
I fear it's not true, at first because it is not not good ended it is, and
answers a need, I would say, it is not as good as it could be.
( sure, no tag will ever be)
And then because if people have nothing better, they will use it
sylvain letuffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Are there other applications that care whether something really does
not have a name or whether the name is just not know?
Yes, I see one. Someone might argue I am not of good faith, but anyway there
it is :
Suppose I'm working for a local urban
Patrick Kilian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
Patrick Kilian wrote:
validate:empty-tag-key
validate:empty-tag-value
validate:untagged-way
validate:bridge-or-tunnel-without-layer
validate:deprecated-tags
validate:motorway-without-ref
validate:place-of-worship-without-religion
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 07:41:41AM -0800, SteveC wrote:
Um it sounds like we need a system to report abuse rather than just
making it public?
I'm with that, and mentioned it already. Who should get sent abuse
reports?
Simon
--
A complex system that works is invariably found to have evolved
Hi,
Simon Ward wrote:
Um it sounds like we need a system to report abuse rather than just
making it public?
I'm with that, and mentioned it already. Who should get sent abuse
reports?
We could create a mailing list where these are simply dumped, and anyone
who cares to work on these
On 06:15:03, Matt Amos did write:
i'm in favour of removing this functionality entirely. and the user
diaries too. there are open, well-written and (relatively) bug-free
versions of these sorts of software which we should integrate instead.
we could move the diaries to wordpress blogs and
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:11 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Better editor (or API) support for different languages is surely a
better way to go.
If everyone here are native english speakers or speaks relatively
fluently, and they all take the pragmatic route of using UK centric
tagging
Here is a new proposal to help (great!) validators tools to help enlight
problems in the OSM DB
It also give, in itself, some information on the quality of the internal osm
data
two validators are expecting to use it soon :
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maplint
and
no problems ! I'll copy my end page on the validate: namespace in the talk
list if you allow me to.
Sure. Go ahead.
I was not kidding, there it is, in just one hour. I'am moving to support it in
my renderer, you can do it on your side.
As ever with osm, support what you want, but
A while ago (last spring?) the coastline error checker displayed an error for
the coastlines of very small islands where there was actually nothing wrong
with the coastline. I thought this bug in the coastline error checker was
fixed then, because the Great Lakes area has once been completely
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 12:08 AM, Erik Johansson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:11 PM, David Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Better editor (or API) support for different languages is surely a
better way to go.
If everyone here are native english speakers or speaks relatively
Just to summarise a bit:
2 major points:
1. If its a barangay then tag them as such, place=barangay
2. Well it is the same as a village, then tag them as place:village
and, add a page in the wiki explaining that the village tag represents
barangay in the Philippines
There's also a suggestion in
Hi,
If you can spend the time to find good names for the individual option
(and merge say residential-without-name and poi-without-name to noname)
and do all the stuff in the wiki, I'm certainly not opposed to change
the naming in maplint. If we can reach consensus in this way and have
tags
Hi,
I prefer the second because it makes a street having no name and having no
sign with a name impossible.
( If find them exclusives, since if there is no name, there can't be a name
sign, or else there is an error)
But if some people thing it should be possible, then I'll propose the
Ik bladerde net door Name_finder:Translations heen op de wiki, en zag daar
College (amenity=college) tertiary education, not university college staan
en vroeg me af hoe dat te vertalen.
De omschrijving op Tag:amenity=college:
This complements 'amenity=university', approved earlier. This was not
On Monday 24 November 2008, Freek wrote:
Ik bladerde net door Name_finder:Translations heen op de wiki, en zag
daar College (amenity=college) tertiary education, not university
college staan en vroeg me af hoe dat te vertalen.
Te laat, want ik heb alles al naar het Nederlands vertaald :-) (*)
On Monday 24 November 2008, you wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008, Freek wrote:
Ik bladerde net door Name_finder:Translations heen op de wiki, en zag
daar College (amenity=college) tertiary education, not university
college staan en vroeg me af hoe dat te vertalen.
Te laat, want ik heb
On Monday 24 November 2008, Freek wrote:
Blijkbaar is MBO in Vlaanderen technisch secundair onderwijs (TSO)
[1] (voornamelijk derde graad)
TSO is wel voor het gehele secundair, niet enkel de derde graad.
en valt dit ook onder de term
college in het Engels, maar niet onder de term hogeschool
On Monday 24 November 2008, Ben Laenen wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008, Freek wrote:
Blijkbaar is MBO in Vlaanderen technisch secundair onderwijs (TSO)
[1] (voornamelijk derde graad)
TSO is wel voor het gehele secundair, niet enkel de derde graad.
Daarom noemde ik het expliciet, MBO in
Misschien is het sowieso een idee om een extra tag toe te voegen. Waarmee we
aan kunnen geven of iets een MBO/HBO/... is, middelbare school
(VMBO/HAVO/VWO/)
Altijd weer leuk voor thema kaartjes.
--Roeland
On Monday 24 November 2008 21:52:53 Freek wrote:
On Monday 24 November 2008, Ben
On Monday 24 November 2008, Roeland Douma wrote:
Misschien is het sowieso een idee om een extra tag toe te voegen. Waarmee
we aan kunnen geven of iets een MBO/HBO/... is, middelbare school
(VMBO/HAVO/VWO/)
Altijd weer leuk voor thema kaartjes.
Ja, aan zoiets zat ik ook te denken.
Sven Eppler schrieb:
Wenn ihr natürlich langfristig darauf abzielt, die Kommunikation auf der
offiziellen OSM-Seite im wesentlichen etwas Weg von einer Community Idee
zu bewegen und mehr inhaltbezogene Kommunikation zu erzwingen, wären
solche öffentlichen Talkpages sicher nicht ganz verkehrt.
2008/11/23 Marc Kura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moin..
Gibt es einen brauchbaren Logger der unter Windows Mobile läuft?
Ich verwende immer gpvVP, das kann auch die Slippymap im Hintergrund
einblenden.
http://code.google.com/p/gpsvp/downloads/list
Gruß,
Melchior
Thomas Drebert schrieb:
ich habe in meiner Gegend diverse Postleitzahlen gemappt
Hat sich da mittlerweile ein Standard gebildet? Soll immer noch
jede Straße mit einer PLZ versehen werden?
In meiner Stadt gibt's nur eine PLZ. Reicht da die PLZ
nur in den place-Node zu schreiben?
MFG Chris
Am 23.11.08 schrieb Michael Schmitt:
Wobei ich keine Landkreise kenne die in Bezirke unterteilt sind. Die
Die kreisfreie Stadt Leipzig besteht aus zehn Stadtbezirken, die wiederum
aus bis zu zehn Stadtteilen bestehen. Im Landkreis Leipzig (dem die Stadt
nicht angehört), gibt es sieben
2008/11/24 Chris66 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thomas Drebert schrieb:
ich habe in meiner Gegend diverse Postleitzahlen gemappt
Hat sich da mittlerweile ein Standard gebildet? Soll immer noch
jede Straße mit einer PLZ versehen werden?
In meiner Stadt gibt's nur eine PLZ. Reicht da die PLZ
nur in
Matthias Wimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Schmitt schrieb:
Heiko Jacobs schrieb:
6: Landkreis bzw. kreisfreie Stadt, einheitlich bis auf Hamburg und
Berlin
in Bremen koennte man Bremen und Bremerhaven als zwei kreisfreie
Staedte bezeichnen, so au laut Wikipedia kreisfreie Stadt
Am Montag, 24. November 2008 14:32 schrieb Heiko Jacobs:
In Hamburg scheint die politishce Mitsprache auf Bezirksebene
zu laufen (7) mit Unterteilung derselben in Stadtteile (11), wobei
einige davon wohl zu Ortsaemtern zusammengefasst werden? (10?)
Ortsämter gibt es nicht mehr, das war mal
Norbert K?ck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
W?re in deinem Beispiel nicht die Fl?che des Stadtbremischen
?berseehafengebietes definiert? Somit kann es dann zur Addition des
Landesgebietes vollst?ndig genutzt werden.
Genau. Es gibt dort kein Problem der Fl?chenzuweisung. Was nicht zur
Gemeinde
Matthias Wimmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ossi schrieb:
Hab ich das richtig verstanden, dass ein Stadtteil admin_level 10 w?re?
Oder admin_level 7 falls die Stadt kreisfrei ist.
Darueber reden wir uns gerade in einem anderen Faden die Koepfe heisz:
nochmals zu admin_type und boundary oder so
Hallo,
Habe eben mal auch noch Stadtbezirk in der Wikipedia nachgelesen.
Demnach spricht man von Stadtbezirk, wenn diese eine eigene politisch-
verwaltungstechnische Einheit bilden, wogegen Stadtteile und -viertel
nur statistische Einheiten bilden ohne eigene Vertretung.
GIGO - garbage in
Hi,
In Hamburg scheint die politishce Mitsprache auf Bezirksebene
zu laufen (7) mit Unterteilung derselben in Stadtteile (11), wobei
einige davon wohl zu Ortsaemtern zusammengefasst werden? (10?)
nur zwei Kleinigkeiten: Es sind 105 Stadtteile und soweit ich mich
erinnere wurden die Ortsämter
Marcus Wolschon:
2008/11/24 Chris66[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thomas Drebert schrieb:
ich habe in meiner Gegend diverse Postleitzahlen gemappt
Hat sich da mittlerweile ein Standard gebildet? Soll immer noch
jede Straße mit einer PLZ versehen werden?
In meiner Stadt gibt's nur eine PLZ. Reicht da
Hallo,
Heiko Jacobs schrieb:
Wobei nach meinem amtl. Stadtplan von Bremerhaven das stadtbremische
Ueberseehafengebiet ca. 100 m vor der Stromkaje endet...
Weisz aber nicht, ob das wirklich amtlich ist oder nur so dargestellt.
Nein es ist nicht so. Die Stromkaje gehört dazu, allerdings nur bis
On Monday, 3 November 2008 01:27:34 +0100,
Thomas Hog [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Guenther Meyer schrieb:
nur sind osm-daten schon prinzipbedingt zur zeit unvollstaendig, und
da ist es durchaus sinnvoll, unterscheiden zu koennen, ob eine
strasse, die ploetzlich aufhoert, wirklich so
Habe Deine Mail zu spät gelesen und das gleiche in gruen in den
anderen Thread geschrieben... nun gut irgendwas ist ja immer.
Die Stadtteile haben dann noch Unterteilungen, die aber wohl nicht wirklich
irgendwo verzeichnet sind, manchmal heißen diese: Siedlung oder Ortsteil
Schau an. Wieder
Bernd Raichle schrieb:
Beispielsweise tagge ich gerne alle _Endpunkte_ eines Weges, wo es mit
keinem Verkehrsmittel legal und/oder mit einfachen Mitteln mehr
weitergeht, mit noexit=yes
Nur zum Verständnis:
Fuß ist ein Verkehrsmittel?
Also Fußweg ab Sackgassen-Wendehammer rüber zur
Fabian Schmidt schrieb:
Am 23.11.08 schrieb Michael Schmitt:
Wobei ich keine Landkreise kenne die in Bezirke unterteilt sind. Die
Die kreisfreie Stadt Leipzig besteht aus zehn Stadtbezirken, die
wiederum aus bis zu zehn Stadtteilen bestehen. Im Landkreis Leipzig
(dem die Stadt nicht
Das sind mal Neuigkeiten:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Luftbilder_aus_Bayern
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Am Montag 24 November 2008 schrieb Bernd Wurst:
Kennst du das Export-Tab auf openstreetmap.org? Wenn du dort
Embeddable HTML auswählst, bekommst du eine kleine Splippymap mit
dem Ausschnitt, den du grade siehst.
Vielen Dank für diesen Hinweis - ich dachte, dass Export immer statisch
ist. So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Moin,
wie sieht's eigentlich mit der Unterstützung von Renderern für Straßen,
die nicht wie herkömmlich getagged werden, sondern deren einzelne
Wegsegmente in eine Relation gepackt werden, die die benötigten
Informationen (wie name, maxspeed, ...)
Norbert K?ck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wobei nach meinem amtl. Stadtplan von Bremerhaven das stadtbremische
Ueberseehafengebiet ca. 100 m vor der Stromkaje endet...
Weisz aber nicht, ob das wirklich amtlich ist oder nur so dargestellt.
Nein es ist nicht so. Die Stromkaje geh?rt dazu, allerdings
Johann H. Addicks schrieb:
Sven Eppler schrieb:
Wenn ihr natürlich langfristig darauf abzielt, die Kommunikation auf der
offiziellen OSM-Seite im wesentlichen etwas Weg von einer Community Idee
zu bewegen und mehr inhaltbezogene Kommunikation zu erzwingen, wären
solche öffentlichen Talkpages
Am Montag, 24. November 2008 15:53 schrieb Lars Francke:
Habe Deine Mail zu spät gelesen und das gleiche in gruen in den
anderen Thread geschrieben... nun gut irgendwas ist ja immer.
Die Stadtteile haben dann noch Unterteilungen, die aber wohl nicht
wirklich irgendwo verzeichnet sind,
Heiko Jacobs schrieb:
Hmmm... Das Tief wurde aber verlegt wg. CT ...
Ist ja nicht so, wie in alten Zeiten, als es Klosterleuten möglich war,
durch die Verlegung eines Bachlaufs in den Herrschaftsbereich eines
anderen Kirchenfürsten zu gelangen. :-)
Die Grenze ist schön da geblieben, wo sie
Am 22. November 2008 17:30 schrieb hansdorfff [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
hallo,
ich kann keine Funkmasten und Kläranlagen in der MapListe finden !
Was fuer Funkmasten? Allgemein werden die man_made=tower bezeichnet.
Den Radiosendemast auf Hoeldigbaum hier in Hamburg hab ich mal mit
Ich mache in zwei Wochen Urlaub auf Gomara.
Natürlich nicht zum Spaß, sondern um zu mappen ;-)
Ich dachte mir, das es eventuell nützlich sein könnte, OSM Flyers auf
Spanisch mitzunehmen.
Auf den spanischen Wikiseiten komme ich nicht so recht klar, meine
Spanischkenntnisse sind sehr
Hallo Jacques,
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/misc/pr_material/releases/
Gruß, Stephan.
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Am 23. November 2008 12:55 schrieb Norbert Wenzel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 11/22/2008 11:47 AM, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
Norbert Wenzel[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 11/22/2008 08:25 AM, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
Um die berggipfel an die richtige stelle plazieren zu können, wäre es
schön, wenn man
... das einzig sinnvolle, was man aus der bisherigen Diskussion rauslesen
kann, ist, da? es einfach bei admin_level=9 nicht aus sein darf.
Hier in Wien gibt es statistische Daten ja sogar bis Baublock-Niveau, also
..._level 12 oder 13?
lg von der Mazzesinsel
Wolfgang
-Original
Am Dienstag 25 November 2008 schrieb Bernd Wurst:
Bzgl. Banner und Logo: Ich finde es besser wenn das dezenter ist.
Okay, das verstehe ich. Aber so wie bei den Karten von Map24 könnten wir
wenigstens ein kleines Logo (24x32 Pixel oder so) in der Ecke der Karte
platzieren, was meinst du?
Gruß
2008/11/25 Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hallo,
Thomas Drebert wrote:
ich habe hier eine Straße wo die Hausnummern getaggt sind aber nicht der
Straßenname wie kann man auf einfache weise
nur die Hausnummern markieren ohne das die anderen Nodes von den Gebäuden
mit selektiert werden
also offensichtlich ist die österreichische Verwaltung hier einfach
präziser; demnach sind Statutarstädte (vgl. kreisfreie ...) ex lege
gleichzeitig Bezirk und decken damit wohl zwei admin_levels ab. Was ist böse
daran?
es hilft jedenfalls jenen, die versuchen in internationale Pläne Grenzen
Karl Eichwalder [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Bei Hedersdorf finde ich ein überflüssiges Wegstück.
JOSM sagt aber, dass es nicht zur Relation gehört.
Ich bin unschuldig. Vermutlich ist das so etwas wie ein zubringer:
Der *Frankenweg* verläuft oft auf dem kamm
Am 25.11.2008, 08:28 Uhr, schrieb Karl Eichwalder [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nördlich von Gräfenberg bis zum Signalstein sollte nun alles passen.
Hier meine sonntägliche schneewanderung:
http://www.gnu.franken.de/ke/trips/2008/20081123-signalstein.html
Hallo Karl,
ich würde mir das gerne mal
Salve. Solo ultimamente ho notato che il validator di josm di segnala una
info circa delle overlapping areas e overlapping highways (with areas).
La segnalazione riguarda una strada con un parco adiacente che ho disegnato
sovrapponendo il tratto del confine del parco con la way.
Sbirciando in
Buongiorno,
volevo accennare alcune news rispetto alle opportunità di Openstreetmap
legati ai software di navigazione :
come ho già scritto qualche tempo fa in questa mailing list è possibile
partecipare alla fase di beta testing di Lasernav 09 .
Il software realizzato da Laser Navigation di
Il domenica 23 novembre 2008 18:53 Samuele Battarra ha scritto:
Ciao a tutti.
Oggi ho notata che è sparita parte della costa adriatica tra Ancona e
Rimini. E' un lavoro in corso di qualcuno o è un errore?
Eventualmente c'è modo di recuperarla?
Sono riuscito a recuperarla da un vecchio
Il lunedì 24 novembre 2008 23:58 Francesco ha scritto:
C'è una seconda linea boundary relativa alla sola regione Marche, mi
chiedo e vi chiedo: non è il caso di eliminarla visto che è integrata
nella coastline mediante relazione?
L'ho vista, però ho visto anche che molti dei confini della
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
