On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Roland Olbricht roland.olbri...@gmx.dewrote:
I would like to add to the map the bus routes of Wuppertal. After starting
with a sample (4 out of about 50 routes), it turned out to be a tedious
task
due to poor tool support. Thus, I'm thinking about writing a
On 24 Aug 2009, at 20:18, Péter Connell wrote:
Wonder if we need some openjourneyplanner thing - obviously a
massive task.
... but who owns bus timetables?
The argument is raging as we speak This is a great blog post on
the subject which shows how hard the agencies are being pushed
Thanks in part to OSM project, I am getting some bread out of small
mapping projects.
As a way of giving back, I try to negotiate with the client that
portions of the data collected should be donated to OSM. Some agree
and I am processing some of it from a recent mapping trip.
Another option
Sem videl, da si se ze zmenil glede morebitnih konfliktov pri SLO-CRO
meji... Super :)
lpi
2009/8/23 Stefan Baebler stefan.baeb...@gmail.com
Ha, pri ogledu obstoječih relacij [1] sem opazil svežo južno mejo,
uvoženo iz wikimedie, s prošnjo po izboljšavi:
Hi,
After checking if something like wikitude could be done using OSM content i
found some info that made me wonder if wikitude content could be imported
into OSM.
http://www.wikitude.org/add-content
In the 2nd message on this page you'll read With regards to intellectual
property, Wiktude.me
--- On Tue, 25/8/09, Joel joelheeth...@gmail.com wrote:
Doing this would ofcourse be very useful since it would add
several thousands of POI's to OSM.
If you do end up importing, make sure you check there is no similar POI already
in the DB :)
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:39 PM, David Paleinod.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:53:53 +1000, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:48 PM, David Paleinod.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to start discussion on the deprecation of the Tag:highway=stop in
favour
Stephen Hope wrote:
Can I suggest that the documentation for the human
conveyor has a section that states clearly that it is not for goods,
and pointing to the goods tagging. And maybe the reverse in the other
tag.
This can and should be done this way.
Hopefully, editor preset makers and
--- On Mon, 24/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
stop=first (-1)
stop=last (yes)
stop=both (both)
Hrmm that is more concise, but I think less
self-explanatory (remember
that not everyone reads the wiki before editing). E.g.
stop=both could
be misunderstood to mean
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:44 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
What happens at T intersections where there is a stop sign on all ways, and
cross intersection with 4 stop signs, the US version of a roundabout
effectively.
The ways must be split so that they end (or begin) at the
--- On Mon, 24/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
The ways must be split so that they end (or begin) at the
intersection. (This is required for most of the relation
proposals
anyway, IIRC.)
Then, each way to which a stop sign applies should be
tagged with
stop=at_last_node
Hi Alexander,
Nice to see it popular, however...
a few of us like to use a twitter search for openstreetmap to see
what humans are saying but recently pretty much all of the tweets we
receive for this search are from these bots.
Would it be possible to reduce the level of spam - one example
Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Conditions_for_access_tags
This proposal does not seem specific enough. Shouldn't it list exactly
which simple keys can be modified this way, especially for the
:transport mode extension?
There is no need to
On 24/08/2009, at 8:53 AM, Roy Wallace wrote:
I don't like this, because before is arbitrary. If the stop
requirement applies to the intersection, I think it should be applied
to the intersection itself (either directly or as a member of a
relation).
I agree that these kind of things should
On 24 Aug 2009, at 09:35, Tim Waters (chippy) wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Nice to see it popular, however...
a few of us like to use a twitter search for openstreetmap to see
what humans are saying but recently pretty much all of the tweets we
receive for this search are from these bots.
Would it
When I'm fixing these, I just delete one of the ways in OSM and make
sure that all the other connections are correct. It really doesn't
matter about the tiger tags. As I don't know where there are county
boundaries, I've just been leaving them as is (though occasionally
been having to move
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 6:22 PM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I liked your suggestion of putting a node just before the intersection and
tagging it, making relations and splitting ways sounds like something very
convulted just for a stop sign so most people probably won't be
--- On Mon, 24/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
It wasn't my suggestion. I don't like the idea of putting
a node just
before the intersection, because that is arbitrary. If
we're tagging
an attribute of the way, tag the way - if we're tagging an
attribute
of the intersection,
Hi!
I believe I never officially 'announced' OSMdoc on this mailing list
I'd like to do this now:
http://osmdoc.com
It is a site using a JavaScript interface to view tag usage data. It
uses the whole planet and the data can be easily sorted and filtered.
That sums it up already. It has some but
Of course there is a problem right after announcing it.
I know what the problem is and I'll fix it later this day.
Unfortunately I had to take the application offline for the time being
as it caused heavy load on the database.
I'll post again when the problem has been fixed.
Sorry!
Lars
John Smith wrote:
--- On Mon, 24/8/09, Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com wrote:
The ways must be split so that they end (or begin) at the
intersection. (This is required for most of the relation
proposals
anyway, IIRC.)
Then, each way to which a stop sign applies should be
tagged with
--- On Mon, 24/8/09, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
Adding an extra node does make sense, but probably needs a
'relation' to
the intersection as well? In any case the direction through
this new
node is the critical piece of information? Tagging ways
would require
that every section
It's back online. The old version has been online for the last two hours.
But now you can view the new data again. I had to limit it a bit
though. You can't filter or sort the values for keys which have more
than 100.000 distinct values anymore. This shouldn't be a big thing
because it mainly
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:00:14 +1000, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 3:39 PM, David Paleinod.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 08:53:53 +1000, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 8:48 PM, David Paleinod.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to start
Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 24 Aug 2009, at 09:35, Tim Waters (chippy) wrote:
Hi Alexander,
Nice to see it popular, however...
a few of us like to use a twitter search for openstreetmap to see
what humans are saying but recently pretty much all of the tweets we
receive for this search are
2009/8/24 Lars Francke lars.fran...@gmail.com:
It
uses the whole planet and the data can be easily sorted and filtered.
are you sure it uses the whole planet? I get 2 results for
amenity=drinking_water, but I have just in the Rome-area already
inserted more than 500 of them. Please check if you
(I suppose your reply was meant to t...@? If not, sorry for posting it)
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:32:06 +0100, Matt Williams wrote:
2009/8/24 David Paleino d.pale...@gmail.com:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:11:59 -0500, David Lynch wrote:
I suspect that I'd end up creating a set of ways that look
On 24 Aug 2009, at 17:03, Andrew Ayre wrote:
Alexander - I think if you urlencode a URL before passing it to
twitter,
twitter will automatically shorten it using the bit.ly service.
Might be
something to look into. Then neither openstreetmap.org or osm.org will
be used for the URLs.
2009/8/24 Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
2009/8/24 Lars Francke lars.fran...@gmail.com:
It
uses the whole planet and the data can be easily sorted and filtered.
are you sure it uses the whole planet? I get 2 results for
amenity=drinking_water, but I have just in the Rome-area
2009/8/24 Andrew Ayre a...@britishideas.com:
Alexander - I think if you urlencode a URL before passing it to twitter,
twitter will automatically shorten it using the bit.ly service. Might be
something to look into. Then neither openstreetmap.org or osm.org will
be used for the URLs.
it
Am Montag, 24. August 2009 schrieb John McKerrell:
On 24 Aug 2009, at 17:03, Andrew Ayre wrote:
Alexander - I think if you urlencode a URL before passing it to
twitter,
twitter will automatically shorten it using the bit.ly service.
Might be
something to look into. Then neither
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:06 PM, David Paleinod.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no physical barrier, and the lanes are divided by continuous lines
-- that would be a no-changing-lanes restriction, but I'd still be
uncomfortable with drawing two separate ways -- that doesn't reflect real
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:42:53 -0400, Richard Weait wrote:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:06 PM, David Paleinod.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no physical barrier, and the lanes are divided by continuous lines
-- that would be a no-changing-lanes restriction, but I'd still be
uncomfortable
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:11:59 -0500, David Lynch wrote:
I suspect that I'd end up creating a set of ways that look something
like this, plus a whole bunch of oneway tags and turn restrictions:
http://dl1050.dyndns.org:/images/osm/cfi.png
Wouldn't that make routers say turn left and at the
There was an attempted Local Chapters Working Group call today, Andrew
Turner, Vincent Meurisse and myself called in.
We think the call needs to be rescheduled, it appears not many people could
make it. Is there a better time for those that are interested? From
looking at the wiki the time
The new Bad data proposal is a scheme to mark traced aerial photography or
maps as out of date or otherwise unreliable so that they can be obscured
in editors and users dont copy details into the OSM database reducing its
accuracy.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bad_data
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 10:51:23AM +0100, Shaun McDonald wrote:
a few of us like to use a twitter search for openstreetmap to see
what humans are saying but recently pretty much all of the tweets we
receive for this search are from these bots.
Would it be possible to reduce the level of
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:25, Konrad Skerikon...@skeri.com wrote:
On Sun, 23 Aug 2009 18:11:59 -0500, David Lynch wrote:
I suspect that I'd end up creating a set of ways that look something
like this, plus a whole bunch of oneway tags and turn restrictions:
Hi Kate + group,
There's been a bit of confusion around Local Chapters meetings - I tried to
sort out the confusion last week, but clearly did not do a very good job ;-)
Sorry if you guys wasted your time today.
A lot of the community felt that the best way forward for Local Chapters
would be to
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Tobias Knerr wrote:
Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Conditions_for_access_tags
For example, with this proposal it is
possible to create both bicycle:backward and oneway:bicycle, while I
would really prefer to only have the
Christiaan Welvaart wrote:
In front of a station, there is a road that must not be used by motor
vehicles except busses. This road also is an oneway road, with no
exceptions. Therefore, I consider it natural to tag this
- oneway = yes
- (access:)motor_vehicle = no
- (access:)bus = yes
This
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/8/22 Christiaan Welvaart c...@daneel.dyndns.org:
hi,
I changed some things on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access -
Added a tag for low performance mopeds, because in some countries they are
by law neither a bicycle nor a true
Le lundi 24 août 2009 à 15:25, Lester Caine a écrit :
Adding an extra node does make sense, but probably needs a 'relation' to
the intersection as well? In any case the direction through this new
node is the critical piece of information? Tagging ways would require
that every section of a way
On 24 Aug 2009, at 18:56, Alexander Klink wrote:
Sorry, didn't think about that. I've changed the bot to use
osm.org, my bots will use that right away, I hope the other
bot owners will update as well.
8-)
There currently isn't a shortlink for the browse pages. Instead
you'll
need to use
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Lester Caineles...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
The exact problem here is that the 'STOP' requirement only relates to
the junction with another road and is therefore not a tag of the way or
the intersection, but rather information relating to approaching one
from the
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:23 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
I've seen a lot of talk about stop signs, but in Australia there is also give
way signs, which can imped flow of traffic similar to stop signs.
Replacing stop with give_way (or similar) should do the trick. The
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:32:46 +0200, Renaud MICHEL wrote:
Le lundi 24 août 2009 à 15:25, Lester Caine a écrit :
Adding an extra node does make sense, but probably needs a 'relation' to
the intersection as well? In any case the direction through this new
node is the critical piece of
El Lunes, 24 de Agosto de 2009, Nick Black escribió:
The good news, especially for the patient and keen Locals like Ivan, is
that the OSM-F board agreed last Saturday that we could go ahead and start
to form local chapters based on a provisional agreement.
/me jumps in joy :-D
--
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:54:00 +1000, Roy Wallace wrote:
So IMHO David's proposal is a good way to avoid the use of a relation
- if that is what people want. I personally don't mind relations as
they're more explicit and not dependent on way direction.
I don't mind relations either, I use lots
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:58 AM, David Paleinod.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, they must IMHO. The wiki explains the ontology of the tags we're using,
and the wiki is the main regulamentation for tags. Otherwise we go wild, and
everyone uses what she likes best.
Yes, but STILL - tags should
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:54:00 +1000
From: Roy Wallace waldo000...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] [RFC] Deprecating the use of Tag:highway=stop
in favour of Key:stop
To: Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk
Cc: OSM Talk talk@openstreetmap.org
Message-ID:
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:16:34 +1000, Roy Wallace wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 1:58 AM, David Paleinod.pale...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, they must IMHO. The wiki explains the ontology of the tags we're
using, and the wiki is the main regulamentation for tags. Otherwise we go
wild, and
People, please *don't* CC me. I'm subscribed to the list.
On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 01:02:30 +0200, Pieren wrote:
Tagging a whole way just because you have to stop at the end is a deep
modeling mistake.
Please, explain why.
There is no similarity between the oneway which applies to the way
with
2009/8/25 Martin Norbäck mar...@norpan.org:
Using a relation has some advantages:
* it connects the stop requirement to the junction node (you can look
at the junction node to see that there is a stop requirement)
* if the way leading to the junction is split/reversed, the relation
still
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Pierenpier...@gmail.com wrote:
Tagging a whole way just because you have to stop at the end is a deep
modeling mistake.
There is no similarity between the oneway which applies to the way
with a stop sign which applies to an intersection.
I see what you mean,
2009/8/23 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
(1) Default tags can be changed. We should remember that default tags
can be edited by somebody later and they will no longer be good for
other languages.
This fact speaks for both sides of the argument. If some feature's
name changes (think, a
This way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/39456905
is marked as layer = -1, tunnel = yes, waterway = stream. I was
expecting it to be rendered by Mapnik as a dashed line and paler to
indicate it was underground, but I don't see that.
Any ideas why?
Andy
--
Andy
PGP Key ID:
Andrew Ayre wrote:
This way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/39456905
is marked as layer = -1, tunnel = yes, waterway = stream. I was
expecting it to be rendered by Mapnik as a dashed line and paler to
indicate it was underground, but I don't see that.
Any ideas why?
hi,
on API i can GET
http://www.openstreetmap.org/api/0.6/way/Id
using the same string on XAPI like
http://osmxapi.hypercube.telascience.org/api/0.6/way/38427403
results in firefox can't find the file...
initially I typed
http://www.informationfreeway.org/api/0.6/way/23328268 (other id,
Gefeliciteerd Henk!
betalen voor osmf lidmaatschap is tegen m'n prinicipes (we doen al genoeg
voor osm), anders had je m'n stem gekregen
Rob
Op 24 augustus 2009 10:25 schreef Lambertus o...@na1400.info het volgende:
Gefeliciteerd met je herverkiezing Henk!
Alhoewel ik geen OSMF lid ben zou
Ik vond het voorstel op een andere mailinglijst: dat iedereen met een
significante bijdrage automatisch lid is van de OSMF. De drempel tot lid
worden is dan lager, alleen mensen die écht interesse voor OSM hebben
betrek je op deze manier, mensen zonder de financiele middelen kunnen
dan ook hun
Gefeliciteerd Henk!
Ik heb nog een vraag, want ik begreep van jou dat o.a. Nick Black
plannen had om een working group of iets gerelateerd te gaan vormen
specifiek voor:
user experience en de usability oftewel het verlagen van de drempel en
het aantrekken van een groter publiek
Is al bekend of
Henk,
beter laat dan nooit: Van harte gefeliciteerd met je herverkiezing.
Welverdiend wat mij betreft, je inzet voor SOTM09 was fenomenaal en
dat is hoe ik je (werk) voornamelijk heb meegemaakt. Ik hoop dat er
het komend jaar (nog) meer communicatie vanuit de Foundation,
bijvoorbeeld over de
Ik denk dat het negatieve sentiment vooral wordt gevoed door het niet op
alle fronten transparant acteren van de OSMF.
Wanneer de foundation strikt voor haar doelstelling gaat en ook
duidelijk en helder communiceert over haar activiteiten en afgeleide
trajecten afketst of naar de community
Het ging hier niet om een OSMF-interne aangelegenheid, maar om
aantijgingen van Ramm jegens Cloudmade: de dubbele petten van Nick en
Steve, en het feit dat er zich plotseling een vrij groot aantal
Cloudmade-mensen had geregistreerd als lid van de Foundation. Ramm
suggereerde dat hier een opzet in
Super Milo!
Hij staat er ook tusse op http://www.openstreetmap.nl (als je een betere
teksts hebt hoor ik het wel).
On Saturday 22 August 2009 21:18:18 Milo van der Linden wrote:
http://walking-papers.org/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
De OSMF is zich volgens mij goed bewust van het feit dat bewegingen in
cloudmade verband met argusogen worden waargenomen.
Wat Steve en/of Nick dus hadden kunnen doen was in detail uitleggen
waarom er zoveel cloudmade personeel lid ging worden van de foundation
met daarbij:
- Motivatie voor het
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Rob schreef:
map.google.com http://map.google.com
map.live.com http://map.live.com
map.yahoo.com http://map.yahoo.com
..tile.openstreetmap.com http://tile.openstreetmap.com
map of kaart klinkt toch logischer (voor het grote publiek) als
ik ben ontroerd ;)
ligt zeker aan de dns dat dit nog niet werkt hiero ?
http://map.openstreetmap.nl/
ps: aandachtspuntje, de favicon van de pagina's op het osm domein slaat ook
nergens op.. (iets van vrijschrift?)
Rob
2009/8/24 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Rob schreef:
ik ben ontroerd ;)
Beantwoord je andere mail dan ook eens ;) Ik zit boven het bestel knopje
te wachten!
ligt zeker aan de dns dat dit nog niet werkt hiero ?
http://map.openstreetmap.nl/
Hier doet ie het ;)
ps: aandachtspuntje,
Side note:
Ik snap trouwens niet waarom de ledenlijst van de OSMF niet openbaar is?
Dat de donaties wellicht anoniem worden gehouden vind ik wat anders,
maar elk lid is gelijk en kan dus probleemloos worden getoond. Sterker
nog, het zou kunnen motiveren om ook lid te worden.
Omdat mensen
On Monday 24 August 2009 15:18:10 Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
Side note:
Ik snap trouwens niet waarom de ledenlijst van de OSMF niet openbaar is?
Dat de donaties wellicht anoniem worden gehouden vind ik wat anders,
maar elk lid is gelijk en kan dus probleemloos worden getoond. Sterker
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Henk Hoff schreef:
Dus dat mensen uit arme landen
minder lidmaatschapsgeld zouden hoeven te betalen als mensen uit
rijke landen. Hierover zouden jullie (OSM-F leden) het komende jaar
mogelijk een voorstel voorbij kunnen zien komen
Als
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Henk Hoff schreef:
2009/8/24 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de:
Henk Hoff schreef:
Dus dat mensen uit arme landen
minder lidmaatschapsgeld zouden hoeven te betalen als mensen uit
rijke landen. Hierover zouden jullie (OSM-F leden) het komende
Waar het mij om gaat is, dat de leden zelf moeten kunnen bepalen wie
hun bestuur wordt. Zie ook de verkiezingen van afgelopen weekend: De
leden vonden kennelijk niet dat er meerdere personen van één bedrijf
in het bestuur moesten zitten. Kortom, de leden kunnen dit best zelf
regelen zonder dat we
Hmmm, ik weet niet precies wat ik hier van moet vinden. ;-)
Gr,
Henk
Op 24 augustus 2009 16:51 schreef Lambertus (o...@na1400.info) het volgende:
Offtopic:
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Henk, voor een politicus geen sterke bijdrage.
Wat? Hoezo verwacht jij van
Ik wil niet pietluttig doen, maar een naam is ook persoonlijke informatie ;-)
Hoe dan ook, we hebben hier te maken met wetgeving die eisen en regels
stelt aan het openbaar maken van ledenlijsten.
Zie inline.
Op 24 augustus 2009 16:16 schreef Milo van der Linden
(m...@opengeo.nl) het volgende:
Quoting Henk Hoff toffeh...@gmail.com:
Ik wil niet pietluttig doen, maar een naam is ook persoonlijke informatie ;-)
Hoe dan ook, we hebben hier te maken met wetgeving die eisen en regels
stelt aan het openbaar maken van ledenlijsten.
Klopt. Om het effe over een heel andere boeg te gooien,
Quoting ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl:
Wél moet helder zijn (bij de verkiezingen) wat de belangen etc van
elke kandidaat is/zijn.
MOET ? : Dus toch een regeltje ?
Het lijkt me eerder dat het in de belang van de kandidaten zelf is dat
ze dit doen. Hoe
Beste Talk'ers,
Dit jaar organiseer ik weer een Software Freedom Day. Deze keer bij
Gendo in Amsterdam. Graag wil ik, net als vorig jaar
http://softwarefreedom.nl/2008/index.html , daar ook een ruimte
beschikbaar maken voor een OpenStreetMap Gebruikersdag.
Wordt dat op prijs gesteld?
Zie
Doe maar Bas,
Er zijn vast wel een paar luitjes die
Wat willen vertellen.
Anders gaan we gewoon mappen.
Stefan: Heb jij nog een leuk onderwerp ???
Gert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: talk-nl-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-nl-boun...@openstreetmap.org] Namens Bas
Verzonden:
John Smith wrote:
--- On Sun, 23/8/09, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
They still don't agree with us, they still think it's just another smoothness
option, except for those from Iceland maybe.
Don't get me started on the absolute uselessness of the smoothness tag...
Matt
2009/8/23 David Clarke gadic...@pnambic.org
That's cutting in to our big attractions. So what're we left with, the
big
potato, merino, trout and oyster?
Big gallah in SA somewhere too (around Kimba? I don't remember...)
Big lobster *somewhere*. I know I've seen it, but buggered if I know
Big lobster is in Kingston, SE South Australia.
2009/8/25 Jason Stirk jst...@oobleyboo.com
2009/8/23 David Clarke gadic...@pnambic.org
That's cutting in to our big attractions. So what're we left with, the
big
potato, merino, trout and oyster?
Big gallah in SA somewhere too (around
On 23/08/2009 11:55pm, John Smith delta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote:
That's cutting in to our big attractions. So what're we
left with, the big
potato, merino, trout and oyster?
A good reference for these big attractions is http://www.bigthings.com.au/.
I dont' think we would run out anytime
--- On Tue, 25/8/09, Nick Black nickbla...@gmail.com wrote:
The good news, especially for the patient and
keen Locals like Ivan, is that the OSM-F board agreed last
Saturday that we could go ahead and start to form local
chapters based on a provisional agreement. The board felt
- and I hope
My Dad knew the guy who made the big lobster.
Although that has no relevance to this discussion, I'd just like to claim my
non existent fame.
regards
Paul
:)
From: talk-au-boun...@openstreetmap.org
[mailto:talk-au-boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Cameron
Am Montag 24 August 2009 07:39:33 schrieb Adiac:
Vorschlag:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Cycle_routes/bicyclejunction
Ich bin gerade auf DE:Bicycle gestoßen und ändere meinen Vorschlag in:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bicycle/bicyclejunction
Am Sonntag 23 August 2009 20:22:53 schrieb Tobias Wendorff:
amenity=cafe
cuisine=ice_cream
name=Eiscafé ...
Ok, danke
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Hallo,
am 23.08.2009 21:03 schrieb Torsten Leistikow:
Moin,
etwas eigene Schilderkombinationen findet man beim Mappen ja ab und an.
Letztens ist mir folgendes begegnet:
in den vergangenen Tagen sind hier viele schöne Kuriositäten
durchgerauscht. Schade, dass das nicht im Wiki
Am Sonntag, 23. August 2009 20:08:56 schrieb Tobias Wendorff:
Johann H. Addicks schrieb:
Was tun wir denn, wenn sowohl das Straßenschild, wie auch die
behördliche Liste eine Abkürzung vorsieht? Ausgeschrieben taggen?
Nach dem Treffen mit AEROWEST ist meine Meinung zu den behördlichen
Hi Adiac,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 08:03:07PM +0200, Adiac wrote:
Ich habe im Wiki kein Eiskaffe gefunden. Gibt’s sowas?
amenity = ice_cream ist ein proposed feature, dass ich
gerne verwenden. Denn es geht da ja primär darum, dass
dort Eis verkauft wird, und nicht dass dort Kaffee verkauft
wird
Bernd Wurst schrieb:
old_name
Wird vom aktuellen Namefinder auch gefunden:
name:former findet der nicht? Dann muss ich was umtaggen...
-jha-
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Sven Anders wrote:
Kommt vielleicht auch darauf an, welcher Teil abgekürzt ist bei z.B.
Bahnhofstr. gibt es wohl keine zwei Meinungen wie die Straße heißen soll,
1) Bahnhofstr.
2) Bahnhofsstr.
3) Am Bahnhof
4) Bahnhof
5) Zum Bahnhof
...
Schönen Gruß
Martin
Johann H. Addicks schrieb:
old_name
Wird vom aktuellen Namefinder auch gefunden:
name:former findet der nicht? Dann muss ich was umtaggen...
Würde mich wundern, wenn er es fände. Ist doch nirgends dokumentiert.
Und da old_name seit März 2006 (!) im Wiki beschrieben ist und tausende
Am 22. August 2009 17:49 schrieb Norbert Kück o...@nk-bre.net:
am 22.08.2009 16:16 schrieb André Riedel:
Ich denke das ganze passt in den Gefahrguttransportbereich, ich würde
daher hazmat:water=* vorschlagen. In der Beschreibung ist es
ausdrücklich erlaubt, verschiedene Abstuffungen einzubauen
Am Montag, 24. August 2009 08:47:58 schrieb Martin Trautmann:
Sven Anders wrote:
Kommt vielleicht auch darauf an, welcher Teil abgekürzt ist bei z.B.
Bahnhofstr. gibt es wohl keine zwei Meinungen wie die Straße heißen soll,
1) Bahnhofstr.
2) Bahnhofsstr.
3) Am Bahnhof
4) Bahnhof
5)
Hi !
hat einer von euch schon einmal das tag *collection_times mit perl so
zerlegt das man daraus eine tabelle aufbauen könnte ??
Gruß Jan :-)
*
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Am Montag 24 August 2009 07:39:33 schrieb Adiac:
Grund: Ich würde im Anschluss daran zwei JOSM-Vorlagen
hinzufügen für den Wegweiser und der Karte.
Das habe ich testweise schon gemacht. Vier neue Gruppen stehen in den
JOSM-Einstellungen zur Verfügung. Sicherlich nicht perfekt, aber ein Anfang.
Am Mo, 24.08.2009, 08:41 schrieb Alexander Klink:
amenity = ice_cream ist ein proposed feature, dass ich
gerne verwenden. Denn es geht da ja primär darum, dass
dort Eis verkauft wird, und nicht dass dort Kaffee verkauft
wird ...
Kaffee ist das Getränk, Café das Geschäft.
Darum geben wir
1 - 100 of 247 matches
Mail list logo
