On 02/10/2011 11:01 AM, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote:
If I visit a bus stop by foot I can manage to map the pole/platform.
So this could be level 1. But when I visit within the bus, I can only
manage to map the stop position. So this would be level 1. What should
be level 1 then?
All you
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 14:32:43 +0100, tommy5 wrote:
- vidim da se smije precrtavati sa Binga, što je kul ali ipak želim prvo
malo prošvrljati da imam referencu
e sad me zanima preciznost, da li je 2m jel to dovoljno točno?, tj.
vidim da ima svakakvih logova
tako da moja trasa značajno odudara
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 10:28:07 +, Ivan Biuklija wrote:
Mislim da bi bilo prevelika gnjavaža na svaku pojedinačnu točku
stavljati taj tag, a ja za sada nisam uspio naći način da automatski
dodijelim svakoj točki određeni tag u JOSM-u.
Ako netko ima rješenje, slušam
Nikada ne stavljaš
Kolko sam ja skužio, to nije da ti odabereš područje pa on zmapira sve
ceste, nego da ti klikneš na početak i na kraj ceste, a on onda povuče
liniju između po cesti. To bi po meni bila super stvarčica..
Janko
2011/2/10 Valent Turkovic valent.turko...@gmail.com
Evo još jedna verzija:
http://maps.qualitystreetmap.org/bingtracing/
___
Talk-hr mailing list
Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr
Valent Turkovic izmedju ostalog pisase:
Meni je bolja informacija koliko satelita vidiš (sve preko 5 satelita je
ok, 7-8 je već super preciznost), to sam vidio jedino da prokazuje
MobileTrailExplorer app za symbian (nokia) telefone.
TrekBuddy (Java/Symbian) isto ispisuje broj satelita, a
I have difficulty tagging this kind of gate.
The gate is along the main road. There are actually two gates one is
for vehicle and the other is for pedestrian. In some cases, the gate
for vehicle are permanently closed but allows pedestrian (and also
cyclist, by carrying your bike) to pass
Hi,
These are a couple Of tags I've been using :
spas
No idea.
shop=spa
purified water shops: shop=water?
shop=water_refilling
shop=purified_water
If you use water_refilling, how do you tell the difference between purified
water and the stations where water lorries fill up ?
I know
Hello,
just transmitting the answer officially.
Emilie Laffray
On 10 February 2011 16:53, Antony Pegg wrote:
Thanks emilie, hi John
Yes absolutely fine to trace over. Or on a website. Or cache in a mobile
app...or print out, roll it up and smoke it if you want - the imagery is
totally
It's not really a bug, if you have the following setup:
[...]
What you're telling mapnik is that there are two boundaries, one is
admin_level 6, the other is admin_level undefined. The admin 6 one will
render at z11 or closer, the undefined one renders at z9 to z11.
Correct. And at z11 only,
Apparently I failed to communicate clearly in my first email. Let's
try this again.
Daniel was right, though. Mapnik doesn't see that data as ways and
relations. Both ways and relations are represented as lines in its db.
Relations are 'flattened' during an import with osm2pgsql, and mapnik
To map the boundary as a relation you should have:
Member way:
no boundary tags (that includes the boundary name)
Uh, no. Please, do add boundary=administrative + admin_level=n. Where n is
the highest order admin level that applies, so if two relations with
admin_level=6 and 8
Why would this be needed? I don't see anything in the wiki that says
boundary relations are treated differently than multipolygons. If you tag
them twice (way and relation) your just going to render an extra
overlapping way. You are definitely not supposed to duplicate tags on the
outer ways
Hi,
On 02/10/11 12:34, Daniel Sabo wrote:
Why would this be needed? I don't see anything in the wiki that says boundary
relations are treated differently than multipolygons. If you tag them twice
(way and relation) your just going to render an extra overlapping way. You are
definitely not
I have mapped in one of the affected areas. Some of my work there pre-dates
Anthony's. He modified it, and I am guessing that this is why some of my work
was also deleted. As an example, on September 5, 2009, I added Carrollwood
Bicycle Emporium (48467), a bicycle shop, to a shopping
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:10 AM, Hillsman, Edward hills...@cutr.usf.edu wrote:
I have mapped in one of the affected areas. Some of my work there pre-dates
Anthony’s. He modified it, and I am guessing that this is why some of my
work was also deleted. As an example, on September 5, 2009, I added
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:20 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Here's what happened. Grand plaza was mapped as one single building.
I deleted that one building in order to map it as 3 separate
buildings, because that's essentially what it is (3 buildings, with a
shared roof/awning/whatever).
Hi Anthony,
Don't worry about it. You did great work on the area, because (I gather) you
live out there. I live and work quite a bit farther east, and I do most of my
mapping closer to where I live. I added the bicycle shop and building based on
a single visit. I just wanted to bring this
Am I the only one who is wondering what this whole thread is about? Has
Anthony's edits been removed? If so, why?
I haven't heard of the license change actually being implemented ATM,
and certainly not that edits are being removed.
So, what is this all about?
Regards,
Maarten
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Hillsman, Edward hills...@cutr.usf.edu wrote:
Hi Anthony,
Don't worry about it. You did great work on the area, because (I gather) you
live out there. I live and work quite a bit farther east, and I do most of my
mapping closer to where I live. I added the
On 10 February 2011 14:33, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Am I the only one who is wondering what this whole thread is about? Has
Anthony's edits been removed? If so, why?
I haven't heard of the license change actually being implemented ATM, and
certainly not that edits are being removed.
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:45:47 +0100, Matt Williams wrote:
On 10 February 2011 14:33, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Am I the only one who is wondering what this whole thread is about?
Has
Anthony's edits been removed? If so, why?
I haven't heard of the license change actually being
Also, if a particular user's changes are going to be rolled back, this needs to
include not only undoing things they added or changed but also undoing
deletions.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] collateral damage (was: What the license change isgoing
to do to the map)
From
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Nope, that doesn't really help. Anthony posted a message out of the blue
with a before and after picture and later stated that The board voted to
delete my contributions, and this is the before and after.
Later someone (who
My guess would be that, rather than using a database rollback to reverse the
edits, someone tried to undo them manually by deleting every object he has
touched.
---Original Email---
Subject :[OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: collateral damage (was: What the license changeis
going to do to the map)
Anthony wrote:
I said on a mailing list that I traced from Google. The LWG asked me
which of my edits should be deleted. I told them none of them should
be deleted. So naturally they deleted all of them.
That settles the point of whether or not the removal of your
contributions was
On 10/02/11 14:03, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
My guess would be that, rather than using a database rollback to reverse the
edits, someone tried to undo them manually by deleting every object he has
touched.
A database rollback would be a bit drastic - it would remove every edit
made by
On 10 February 2011 14:01, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Which, by the way, I denied. Tracing aerials does not involve copying data.
Maybe it does and maybe it doesn't. Since I began mapping on OSM
(which was a while ago) the considered opinion of the project was
Don't trace Google imagery.
OK then. It sounds like we need a more sophisticated undo script that can
query the database and find out the full list of actions that the user had done
during a certain time-frame, so as to make sure to undo all of them.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:15 AM, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 February 2011 14:01, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Which, by the way, I denied. Tracing aerials does not involve copying data.
Maybe it does and maybe it doesn't.
It definitely doesn't. There's no maybe about
On 10/02/11 14:16, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
Since the OSM changes are stored in a database, if the database log stores
records of changes, normal procedures for rolling back changes would have
included rolling back the deletions. So, either someone used the database
rollback but didn't
The position of objects is certainly part of the data belonging to those
objects, and tracing of aerial objects is done in order to determine their
position. So, you are copying the positional data from the serial images.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: collateral
OK then. Up until now, the discussion had made it sound as if the changes in
question had happened recently, rather than years ago.
--Original Message--
From: Tom Hughes
To: John Eldredge
Cc: OpenStreetMap talk mailing list
Subject: Re: Fwd: Fwd: Re: collateral damage (was: What the
Regardless of what you believe, Google have said that they don't want
their imagery traced into OSM and OSM have said that they don't want
Google derived data in the database.
You polluted the database with data nobody wants and now have been
trolling the mailing lists ever since. That doesn't
Hi
Am 10.02.2011, 15:24 Uhr, schrieb Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Which, by the way, I denied. Tracing aerials does not involve copying data.
Maybe it does and maybe it doesn't.
It definitely doesn't. There's no maybe about it.
Since you are no judge I dare to object.
However: OSM data
On 10 February 2011 14:24, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
It definitely doesn't. There's no maybe about it.
You seem to have missed my substantive point, so let me restate it:
You deliberately did something we as a community have chosen not to
do. You willfully put the work of others in
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Kay Drangmeister k...@drangmeister.net wrote:
Hi
Am 10.02.2011, 15:24 Uhr, schrieb Anthony o...@inbox.org:
Which, by the way, I denied. Tracing aerials does not involve copying
data.
Maybe it does and maybe it doesn't.
It definitely doesn't. There's no
Anthony wrote:
I thought I understood the policy. To cover your ass so Google can't
say you're encouraging people to break the TOS. But I've been told
that isn't it at all, and that you actually don't want people to trace
from Google.
Honesty - try it some day, it works !
I have come across a couple of seemingly immutable tiles that refuse
to re-render even though higher resolution imagery is available. For
example:
http://ant.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=39.19008048219242lon=-96.60511479564622zoom=14
Toby
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:28:41 +, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Fwd: Re: collateral damage (was: What the
licensechangeis going to do to the map)
Message-ID: 4d53f619.5050...@compton.nu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
I know of no database
Edward Hillsman wrote:
We refer to the OSM community, and the need to respect the work of
others. The way this particular situation was handled could have done
a much better job of respecting the work of others. If software needs
to be modified to make it easier to show such respect, then
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Hillsman, Edward hills...@cutr.usf.edu wrote:
This is not about my losing a few contributions; the information I need to
figure out what
was lost in this part of the map, and hints on how I can reconstruct what I
did, is there in
the my edits history. And
Ed,
Hillsman, Edward wrote:
As an example, on September 5, 2009, I
added Carrollwood Bicycle Emporium (48467), a bicycle shop, to a
shopping center. On October 12, Anthony added an address to this bicycle
shop.
And on October 14, Anthony removed that bicycle shop, and it has been
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Ed,
Hillsman, Edward wrote:
As an example, on September 5, 2009, I added Carrollwood Bicycle Emporium
(48467), a bicycle shop, to a shopping center. On October 12, Anthony
added an address to this bicycle shop.
2011/2/10 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
As an example, on September 5, 2009, I added Carrollwood Bicycle Emporium
(48467), a bicycle shop, to a shopping center. On October 12, Anthony
added an address to this bicycle shop.
And on October 14, Anthony removed that bicycle shop, and it
Hi,
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I think that in this particular case it might be OK that deletions
were not undone (you could argue that deletion with Google as base is
not possible, at least it would be almost impossible to proove). But
for the license change I wonder: how will we deal with the
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:36:53 +0100
Kay Drangmeister k...@drangmeister.net wrote:
However: OSM data integrity is at stake, and you are endangering it,
willfully and knowingly. While you seem to understand the reasoning
behind the OSM contribution policy, you fail to obey it.
You are
2011/2/10 Anthony o...@inbox.org:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:14 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
It is impossible to prooove that *any* of my contributions were done
with Google as a base.
yes, but that was not necessary because you stated it yourself. Btw.:
I am sorry that all these contributions were
Am 10.02.2011 15:12, schrieb Grant Slater:
Message from Mikel 2 days ago explaining:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2011-February/001052.html
I believe the user-revert script used is fairly simple and does not
have direct access to the OSM database. The script does attempt
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:59:45 +
Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
On 10/02/11 19:37, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 15:36:53 +0100
Kay Drangmeisterk...@drangmeister.net wrote:
Let's get this completely fair, and remove all the work of others
who have been caught tracing
Hi,
On 10.02.2011 20:25, Lennard wrote:
@ant: Would it be possible to have the editors collect and report* on
the available zoom levels, as users download Bing tiles while editing?
That's a brilliant idea, but I'm not involved in how editors handle Bing
maps. So the question whether they can
On 10-2-2011 23:37, ant wrote:
On 10.02.2011 20:25, Lennard wrote:
@ant: Would it be possible to have the editors collect and report* on
the available zoom levels, as users download Bing tiles while editing?
That's a brilliant idea, but I'm not involved in how editors handle Bing
maps. So the
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:37 PM, ant antof...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10.02.2011 20:25, Lennard wrote:
@ant: Would it be possible to have the editors collect and report* on
the available zoom levels, as users download Bing tiles while editing?
That's a brilliant idea, but I'm not involved in how
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
Where possible only infringing edits will be removed - I'm not sure why you
think we would or should do more than that. In this case the mapper refused
to cooperate with identifying which edits were infringing so we had to
Anthony wrote:
I've repeatedly identified which
edits were infringing - NONE OF THE EDITS WERE INFRINGING.
I'm afraid there seems to be either a misunderstanding between us or a
contradiction on your part. Earlier in this thread you wrote :
I said on a mailing list that I traced from
On 09/02/2011 11:53, ant wrote:
Hi Dave,
On 09.02.2011 12:26, Dave F. wrote:
Sorry, but I'm failing to see the point in this tool. Why would someone
need to get an idea about where hi-res is?
At 14 it gives inaccurate readings, at 14 you're to far in to *get an
idea*.
Hope you can explain it
On 10/02/2011 23:49, Dave F. wrote:
The blank areas have hi-res imagery (caveat: I have checked every tile)
I *haven't* checked
To follow on:
http://ant.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=51.420057188094106lon=-2.4574914579781226zoom=20
In order to see if an area is super high
On 11 February 2011 00:00, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
In order to see if an area is super high (z20) I have to be actually
zoomed in on that area to zoom level 20. Therefore I can tell if it is
hi-res from the Bing imagery.
I'm really failing to see the purpose of this product.
On 11/02/2011 00:07, Dermot McNally wrote:
I think the theory is that if you have already done the hard work of
zooming in, the next guy won't have to because he'll see the coloured
tiles at that location.
if someone has to do that first to highlight the data that's already
there, then I
- Original Message -
From: Anthony o...@inbox.org
To: Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org
Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:35 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: collateral damage (was: What the license
change is going to do to the map)
On Thu, Feb
On 11 February 2011 00:27, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
At what zoom level to I have to be at to view an already zoomed in area to
view dark blue (z20)?
You could be fairly zoomed out if there are enough adjacent z20 tiles
turned dark blue. But yes, it all needs a lot of eyes to be
I think the video is great. I will definitely point some new mappers
at it. You show how to achieve a single mapping goal in simple terms.
The audio is a little odd though. It sounds like maybe your mic gain
is set too high and there is some clipping going on. And the levels
are out of whack.
Either you traced from Google or none of the edits were infringing.
Those two assertions are mutually incompatible.
No they aren't.
Anthony,
they might not be incompatible as far as you are concerned.
But they are incompatible as far as the OSM community is concerned. That is
a fact.
OSM has repeatedly said it does not want contents that are derived
from Google tracing. It's very clear. OSM is not asking you whether you
think you are allowed to trace from Google. It is telling you that as a
community we don't want you to trace from Google.
Yes. And it's telling me
On 11 February 2011 01:11, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Actually, let me correct that. A tiny fraction (less than 0.001%) of
the OSM community has told me that by deleting contributions which
have absolutely nothing to do with my tracing from Google.
What percentage has told you that that
Anthony wrote:
OSM is not asking you whether you think you are allowed to trace
from Google. It is telling you that as a community we don't want
you to trace from Google.
Yes. And it's telling me that by deleting contributions which have
absolutely nothing to do with my tracing from Google.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
Anthony wrote:
OSM is not asking you whether you think you are allowed to trace
from Google. It is telling you that as a community we don't want
you to trace from Google.
Yes. And it's telling me that by deleting
Anthony wrote:
After admitting to tracing from Google imagery, you refused to tell which
objects were involved.
Oh my God. How many times do I have to say this? NO OBJECTS WERE INVOLVED.
I don't understand how you can both admit tracing from Google imagery
and at the same time tell us
Anthony wrote:
After admitting to tracing from Google imagery, you refused to tell which
objects were involved.
Oh my God. How many times do I have to say this? NO OBJECTS WEREINVOLVED.
I don't understand how you can both admit tracing from Google imagery
and at the same time
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:54 PM, nicholas.g.lawre...@tmr.qld.gov.au wrote:
Anthony, when you traced from google imagery, what went into
OSM?
Nothing.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 11 February 2011 01:34, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Oh my God. How many times do I have to say this? NO OBJECTS WERE INVOLVED.
By now this is all at risk of getting a little like a soap opera, and
like with soaps, there is a risk that people coming in at the middle
of a storyline will
Does anyone think more discussion is going to yield anything useful?
It is obvious that Anthony is unwilling to accept a nearly universally
held community consensus. I initially thought that the wholesale
nuking of all his contributions was a little drastic. But his
continued anti-community
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 8:54 PM, nicholas.g.lawre...@tmr.qld.gov.au wrote:
Anthony, when you traced from google imagery, what went into
OSM?
Nothing.
So why did you say that you had traced from google imagery in
the first place? (if nothing went into OSM)
nick
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
And yes, if as much of the community agreed that 1+1=3 as agrees that
tracing from google is not desirable, then I would tag lanes=3 on 2
lane roads.
I wouldn't. And I think that pretty much sums this whole mess up.
* Anthony goes on to have in his possession simultaneously tea and
no tea, thereby solving one of the stickier puzzle in the
Hitch-hiker's Guide to the Galaxy text adventure game[1]. Go Anthony!
Was there ever a sequel to that text adventure? It
kind of ended on a cliff-hanger ...
nick
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:01 PM, nicholas.g.lawre...@tmr.qld.gov.au wrote:
So why did you say that you had traced from google imagery in
the first place? (if nothing went into OSM)
I think the more interesting question is, if I had demanded that all
my contributions to OSM be removed, would
On 11 February 2011 02:05, nicholas.g.lawre...@tmr.qld.gov.au wrote:
Was there ever a sequel to that text adventure? It
kind of ended on a cliff-hanger ...
Well there was a crucial bit where the protagonist left the planet...
Dermot
--
--
Igaühel on siin
On 11 February 2011 02:09, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I think the more interesting question is, if I had demanded that all
my contributions to OSM be removed, would they have been removed?
What basis would you have had for such a demand?
Dermot
--
--
On 11 February 2011 02:43, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
At what zoom level to I have to be at to view an already zoomed in area to
view dark blue (z20)?
I'm trying, but still failing to see the benefit in this.
Did you make your statement about having traced from Google in order to get all
of your work backed out?
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [OSM-talk] Fwd: Re: collateral damage
From :mailto:o...@inbox.org
Date :Thu Feb 10 20:09:16 America/Chicago 2011
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 9:01 PM,
On 11 February 2011 02:05, nicholas.g.lawre...@tmr.qld.gov.au wrote:
Was there ever a sequel to that text adventure? It
kind of ended on a cliff-hanger ...
Well there was a crucial bit where the protagonist left the planet...
Last bit I remember, the protagonist left the spaceship
to
Damn, I assumed that it was either the 'evil twin' or 'amnesia' plot line.
On Feb 10, 2011, at 8:00 PM, Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11 February 2011 01:34, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Oh my God. How many times do I have to say this? NO OBJECTS WERE INVOLVED.
By now
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:49:58 +, Dave F. wrote:
On 09/02/2011 11:53, ant wrote:
What you do mean by inaccurate readings? I think the map is quite
accurate.
http://ant.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/?lat=51.06122731915702lon=-2.3915486787965934zoom=9
The blank areas have
olá pessoal, tudo bem?
tenho uma dúvida: qual a melhor tag para se usar em ruas dentro de
condominios fechados? (e com acesso restrito)
abraços,
--
David Kurka
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
2011/2/10 Claudomiro Nascimento Junior claudom...@claudomiro.com:
Acho que highway=residential + access=private é o mais adequado.
E barrier=lift_gate que todos os condominos tem por aqui.
--
Johan Dahlin
___
Talk-br mailing list
2011/2/10 Claudomiro Nascimento Junior claudom...@claudomiro.com
Acho que highway=residential + access=private é o mais adequado.
ok!
obrigado! :)
2011/2/10 David Kurka david.ku...@gmail.com
olá pessoal, tudo bem?
tenho uma dúvida: qual a melhor tag para se usar em ruas dentro de
Oi, pessoal !
Eu estou aprendendo a usar o OSM. Por favor, me desculpem se eu
escrever algo próprio de iniciantes.
Minha questão se refere a mapear condomínios fechados.
Em Presidente Prudente, SP, onde eu moro e trabalho, os condomínios
fechados não estão mapeados no Google Maps, no Google Map
Acho que highway=residential + access=private é o mais adequado.
eu so usar highway = residential com o access = restricted:
Foi lindo no Mapnik (ver o Condominio Paraiso dos Lagos por examplo):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-12.64355lon=-38.07376zoom=16layers=M
E barrier=lift_gate que
Eu tenho usado highway=service + service=driveway +
access=private. Tava fazendo assim pensando que essas vias são mais
um acesso aos prédios do que ruas propriamente ditas. Parecia muito
óbvio que eu estava fazendo a coisa certa até ler esse teu email, que
também parece fazer muito sentido :-)
Odeio responder aos meus próprios emails, lá vai...
Na verdade eu nunca mapeei um condomínio fechado de fato, desses
maiores. No máximo, mapeei conjuntos de prédios residenciais, em que
usei os tags como disse. Prá condomínios fechados de verdade, acho o
highway=residential bem adequado!
Olás,
Existe algum tipo de tag (algum access=*, imagino) para marcar
estacionamentos que devem ser usados apenas pelos clientes de um
estabelecimento?
Acho que na página de talk do access=*
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:access#Usage_for_parking.3F),
eles sugerem usar
Existe:
amenity = parking
access = permissive
Existe algum tipo de tag (algum access=*, imagino) para marcar
estacionamentos que devem ser usados apenas pelos clientes de um
estabelecimento?
___
Talk-br mailing list
Talk-br@openstreetmap.org
Eu entendo que o permissive é para casos em que o estacionamento (ou
seja o que for) é particular, mas que na prática o dono permite acesso
prá todo mundo. (access=permissive The owner gives general permission
for access.)
O estacionamento do Restaurante do Pedro é particular (o Pedro é seu
No Wiki de Openstreetmap (Ingleis) disse usar access = permissive para
o estacionamento de cliente ;-)
Eu entendo que o permissive é para casos em que o estacionamento (ou
seja o que for) é particular, mas que na prática o dono permite acesso
prá todo mundo. (access=permissive The owner gives
Hallo Holger, Martin, Nop, Frederik,
vielen Dank an dieser Stelle für Eure Antworten.
Mit nik2img.py klappt es wunderbar (aber Achtung: Die Cairo-Blibiothek, welche
zum Erstellen des SVG benötigt wird, ist in den Windows-Paketen nicht
eingebunden, auf Linux aber kein Problem).
Viele Grüße,
Hi !
jedes Haus hat eigentlich eine Hausnummer - aber nicht immer !
Ich habe auch Häuser bei uns gefunden wo mehrere Baukörper - auch
räumlich auf einem Grundstück getrennt - die selbe Nummer haben.
Sollen wir jetzt jedem der Häuser diese Nummer zuweisen oder wie macht
Ihr das ?
Gruß
hi jan,
ich mach das so:
- in einfachen Situationen tagge ich das Hauptgebäude voll (alle Fünfe)
und mach bei den Nebengebäusen nur building=*
Einfach ist das für mich, da ich auf den Lande wohne und man dort
relativ leicht erkennen kann, wo das Wohnhaus ist.
- bei komplexeren Fällen (z.b.
Moin Jan,
Jan Tappenbeck schrieb:
Ich habe auch Häuser bei uns gefunden wo mehrere Baukörper - auch
räumlich auf einem Grundstück getrennt - die selbe Nummer haben.
Sollen wir jetzt jedem der Häuser diese Nummer zuweisen oder wie macht
Ihr das ?
ich würde das ein wenig von der Lage vor Ort
Hallo Martin,
Ideal ist also:
|
--p--x--p--
|
Zaun, Punkt für Pfosten, Tor, virtuelle Verbindung mit Weg, Tor, Pfosten,
Zaun?
Für Pfosten haben wir bisher ja noch gar keinen Standardwert
Ich meinte nicht, jeden einzelnen Pfosten zu beschreiben.
Sondern Anfang und Ende eines Tors
Am 10.02.11 schrieb Markus:
d.h. es ist notwendig, jeden Verkehrsweg sowohl als Graph als auch als
in seiner konkreten Gestalt als Fläche zu erfasse?
Nein. Es ist notwendig, jeden Verkehrsweg als Graph zu erfassen. Die
Breite der Straße ergibt sich aus width, die maximale Fahrzeugbreite,
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
