On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 07:33:33 Jonas Stein wrote:
Hi,
i tried scanaerial on this lake and its much more precise now.
But i could not findout its name / could not read/write it.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/102880665
I suggest you add a marker to OpenStreetBugs (
Well what can he carry, a GPS logger is easy to carry and runs fine on
batt but it only logs, so what possible device can be used to log and
upload at the same time
or if it just logs, how often can an upload be done?
Once you have something which can upload, you just figure out how to
But this is the problem; the legal side of things is the central
issue to OpenStreetMap at the moment. You can't simply try and
sideline a difficult issue by describing it as legal.
No one is sidelining anything - if it's worthy of discussion, discuss
it with those who can answer the
Richard Masoner writes:
I asked Rails to Trails about licensing their data to OSM and they say
they've been thinking about it and asked me to put them in touch with
somebody official at OSM. They also indicated they would like some kind
of attribution where their data is used.
Hi,
what about http://openrouteservice.org ?
A few more are at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Maps#Routing
bye
Matthias
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Antony Pegg anttheli...@gmail.com wrote:
HI all,
just a quick note - we've added bicycle and pedestrian routing options to
the MapQuest Open sites
more details here:
http://blog.mapquest.com/2011/03/03/open-routing-options-expanded/
couple known things:
Steve Bennett wrote:
Anyway, just did a quick test ...
I'm shocked. That's almost the exact route I took yesterday.
Same test here and same result... The differences being the result of a
couple of mistakes in the map, which I'm going to correct very soon. I'm
pleased with MapQuest Open's
That does not seem to be the consensus. Rather, McDonald's is its own
possessive. See
http://english.stackexchange.com/questions/2933/possessive-of-a-word-thats-already-possessive
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 5:56 AM, Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Fri, 04 Mar 2011 23:14:53 +
Dave F.
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
The relief avoidance weighting is rather extreme - it will make rather large
detours to get around molehills...
Yeah, it possibly goes a little far. But it's easy to add extra way
points to make a more direct route. It's
The intention is to try to understand a bit more about it.
I think I understood what CC-by-SA meant and added information based on that
understanding. Now the rules have changed and I'm not clear about data I
have added in the past, now labelled odbl and if it met the new criteria at
the time I
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 13:34:17 +0100
Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org wrote:
Steve Bennett wrote:
Anyway, just did a quick test ...
I'm shocked. That's almost the exact route I took yesterday.
Same test here and same result... The differences being the result of
a couple of mistakes in
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Antony Pegg anttheli...@gmail.com wrote:
- We've already discovered highway=bridleway not included - we've updated
Hello Ant,
Considering how weak the standardization processes inside OSM is, you
should considered prior art:
John,
john whelan wrote:
The intention is to try to understand a bit more about it.
The legal-talk mailing list is an excellent place to ask questions about
ODbL.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
Ideally, one would be able to set priorities for shortest distance vs. fewer
hills vs. less traffic, and thus adjust the route suggestions to the
individual's preferences. Perhaps, one could save several different presets,
and pick between them.
---Original Email---
Subject :Re:
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 22:17:33 +0100
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
John,
john whelan wrote:
The intention is to try to understand a bit more about it.
The legal-talk mailing list is an excellent place to ask questions
about ODbL.
Bye
Frederik
/sarcasm
On Saturday 05 March 2011 21:12:43 ant wrote:
One more thing... it seems that turn restrictions are regarded--although
they generally don't apply to cyclists (in most countries I guess).
Please fix this.
They should be regarded unless there is a tag except=bicycle on the
restriction relation.
On 3/5/2011 6:10 PM, john whelan wrote:
Since you are unable to supply sufficient information about odbl for me
to feel a level of comfort with it I think the next question becomes how
can we remove my questionable data or is that a topic for legal-talk as
well?
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 23:10:38 -, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com
wrote:
So basically you are saying that it is not possible to explain it in
layman's terms. Thank you for your input.
No, just that your more likely to get an answer about the legal side of
things in legal-talk.
--
No, just that your more likely to get an answer about the legal side of
things in legal-talk.
But this is the problem; the legal side of things is the central
issue to OpenStreetMap at the moment. You can't simply try and
sideline a difficult issue by describing it as legal.
*Open*StreetMap is
On 03/04/2011 08:04 AM, Antony Pegg wrote:
HI all,
just a quick note - we've added bicycle and pedestrian routing options
to the MapQuest Open sites
Thank you! I know I suggested this, I don't know if I was the only one.
knowing the amazing diligence of this community, I'm sure you guys
On 03/04/2011 08:04 AM, Antony Pegg wrote:
knowing the amazing diligence of this community, I'm sure you guys will
find tags we've missed that should or could be used for
bike/pedestrian. If you feel its worth mentioning, please please please
provide some point of reference so we can eyeball
On 03/04/2011 08:04 AM, Antony Pegg wrote:
knowing the amazing diligence of this community, I'm sure you guys will
find tags we've missed that should or could be used for
bike/pedestrian. If you feel its worth mentioning, please please please
provide some point of reference so we can eyeball
On 03/04/2011 08:04 AM, Antony Pegg wrote:
knowing the amazing diligence of this community, I'm sure you guys will
find tags we've missed that should or could be used for
bike/pedestrian. If you feel its worth mentioning, please please please
provide some point of reference so we can eyeball
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:12 AM, ant antof...@gmail.com wrote:
very nice! I've checked some of my daily bicycle routes. Of four routes two
are perfect, and two have become too long--obviously in favour of the use of
cycleways. Don't forget that although cycleways are preferable, cycling on
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Joseph Reeves iknowjos...@gmail.com wrote:
There's a balance that
needs to be struck, but people should understand that legal issues are
core to OSM.
If you want to contribute to a project and not ask questions about the
legal issues concerning data you
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 12:36:32 +1100
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:12 AM, ant antof...@gmail.com wrote:
very nice! I've checked some of my daily bicycle routes. Of four
routes two are perfect, and two have become too long--obviously in
favour of the use of
On 03/04/2011 05:05 PM, john whelan wrote:
A possible task on the OSM side is to check the tags on footways through
parks. Some cities allow bicycles to use them but it needs local
knowledge, perhaps a project of the week? As we start to get more
routing made available so having the right
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 8:04 AM, Antony Pegg anttheli...@gmail.com wrote:
knowing the amazing diligence of this community, I'm sure you guys will find
tags we've missed that should or could be used for bike/pedestrian. If you
feel its worth mentioning, please please please provide some point
On 6 March 2011 09:10, john whelan jwhelan0...@gmail.com wrote:
So basically you are saying that it is not possible to explain it in
layman's terms. Thank you for your input.
The new license changes things from something many people understand
to something massively more complex that it's
*I want to write an OSM mobile application with python for symbian s60. Does
anybody know how I can add OSM API and edit data in my application?
*
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
AFAIK, ORS does not cover my country (Philippines).
I'm using a combination of yournavigation and cloudmade routing (both
provides gpx output) for my purpose for now.
2011/3/5 Matthias Meißer dig...@arcor.de:
Hi,
what about http://openrouteservice.org ?
A few more are at
On 2011-03-06 00:10, john whelan wrote:
My concern is purely that data I have entered may not all have been from
pure uncopyrighted sources and if someone is taking legal action based my
input I would like to feel it was only based on data that was absolutely
pure.
Could you give an example of
Hi welcome to OSM Mahsa,
well first you should discover our data model, data formats and so on.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Develop
Next you should specify the goals of your application, so you want to
write a logger or a router etc
You might get inspiration/code snippets by other
On Friday 04 March 2011 14:28:07 Martijn van Exel wrote:
Degene die zo'n mooie wormtail van Amsterdam maakt krijgt van mij een
drankje naar keuze bij de volgende meetup.
http://eric.marsden.free.fr/osm/wormtrails/paris.html
Heb je zelf al een geschikte uitsnede van Amsterdam uit de
Die heb ik, alhoewel ik niet weet of osmosis het goed doet. De
history-gerelateerde operaties van osmosis zijn experimenteel en niet erg
goed getest. Zie ook hier:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmosis-dev/2011-March/000952.html
Het duurde enkele uren op een 8-core machine. Resultaat is
Lambertus,
Ik heb me vanaf het begin al afgevraagd, jouw load probleem is niet van
vandaag of gister, waarom de pagina is opgebouwd zoals die nu is.
Probleem 1: Niet genoeg ruimte voor alle standaard volledige landen.
Kun je aangeven hoeveel schijven en welke soort schijven je daar voor nodig
Robert, dank voor het meedenken. Mijn reactie is inline:
Op 05-03-11 16:52, Robert Elsenaar schreef:
Lambertus,
Ik heb me vanaf het begin al afgevraagd, jouw load probleem is niet
van vandaag of gister, waarom de pagina is opgebouwd zoals die nu is.
Probleem 1: Niet genoeg ruimte voor alle
Lambertus,
Allereerst respect voor jouw 'roeping' en lof voor de vrijgevigheid van
Oxillion. Dat jij er je roeping van maakt om misbruik te voorkomen, dat
begrijp ik.
Je nieuwe versie werkt prima. De link verschijnt wer en dat is terrecht en
uitstekend.
Leuk is ook, viel me op, dat je ook
Dank. OSM is leuk, mappen is leuk maar uiteindelijk gaat het erom dat er
ook wat nuttigs met al die data gedaan wordt, niet? ;-)
Je suggestie voor een IP traffic check is prima en die zal tzt zijn weg
wel naar de site weten te vinden. Het is alleen jammer dat dit soort
zaken noodzakelijk
Am 05.03.2011 06:23, schrieb Rainer Kluge:
Ist in der Praxis ein relativ kleines Problem da der Router ja
auch über die parallele Straße routen kann
Es ist ein relativ großes Problem, wenn man das Routing erst auf dem
parallel verlaufenden Radweg beginnt, wenn man das Routingziel ändert,
Hallo Henning,
Jetzt sind wir also doch mitten in der ehtischen Diskussion gelandet. Gerade
dein Zitat von Wernher v. Braun zeigt die Doppelbödigkeit auf. Der der In Dora
Mittelberg für seine Wissenschaft hunderte von Zwangsarbeiter gnadenlos bluten
lies, sagt diesen Satz, das passt zu ihm.
Hallo,
UMAX974 wrote:
Es ist und bleibt in
der Verantwortung des einzelnen Mappers, wie auch Wissenschaftlers
eine Folgeabschätzung durchzuführen und dem entsprechend zu handeln.
Ich denke, dass das spaetestens seit dem Manhattan Project auch den
Wissenschaftlern klar ist. So einfach es
Am 5. März 2011 06:37 schrieb Rainer Kluge rklug...@web.de:
In diesem Fall wäre das ein Filter auf
place=locality und -name, beides invertiert.
place=locality ohne Namen macht doch keinen Sinn, der einzige Sinn von
locality ist ja gerade, einen Namen zu vergeben.
Gruß Martin
Am Samstag 05 März 2011, 11:27:35 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hallo,
UMAX974 wrote:
Es ist und bleibt in
der Verantwortung des einzelnen Mappers, wie auch Wissenschaftlers
eine Folgeabschätzung durchzuführen und dem entsprechend zu handeln.
Ich denke, dass das spaetestens seit dem
Am Samstag, 5. März 2011, 11:41:18 schrieb Guenther Meyer:
Am Samstag 05 März 2011, 11:27:35 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
[...]
Ich stimme Henning zu, wenn er sagt: Ob ich etwas eintrage, entscheide
ich. - ich finde es sogar sehr wichtig, klarzumachen, dass (in weiten
Grenzen!) bei uns wirklich
Am 5. März 2011 11:41 schrieb Guenther Meyer d@sordidmusic.com:
Ausserdem:
Wenn sich jemand wirklich unbedingt als z.B. Grabraeuber betaetigen will,
dann kommt er auch ohne OSM an sein Ziel.
das denke ich halt auch. Wenn man als Wissenschaftler gerade etwas neu
entdeckt hat, wird man es
Hallo,
falls du Nominatim nutzen willst, dann empfehle ich dir den Nominatim
Mirror von Mapquest.
Dort hat meine keine Beschränkungen wie oft man abfragen darf.
http://developer.mapquest.com/web/products/open/nominatim
hab damit aus ca. 1100 adressen koordinaten gemacht.
Am Samstag 05 März 2011, 00:45:37 glaubte Henning Scholland zu wissen:
Hallo
Sollen wir dann auch aufhören, Banken einzutragen? Da könnten dann ja
die Bankräuber über OSM die Banken finden.
Zeigst du mir mal bitte eine Wildpflanze, die sich ein großes Schild
mit ihrem Namen umhängt, selber
Am Samstag 05 März 2011, 11:41:18 glaubte Guenther Meyer zu wissen:
Am Samstag 05 März 2011, 11:27:35 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hallo,
UMAX974 wrote:
Es ist und bleibt in
der Verantwortung des einzelnen Mappers, wie auch Wissenschaftlers
eine Folgeabschätzung durchzuführen und dem
Hallo,
Guenther Meyer wrote:
Sehr schoen. Legitimiert das auch, dass ich Daten loesche, von denen ich
persoenlich denke, dass sie aus moralischen Gruenden nichts in OSM zu suchen
haben? Es lebe die Zensur!
Siehst Du, das ist genau das, worum es hier *nicht* geht. Es geht hier
nicht um eine
Am 5. März 2011 15:06 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Niemand legitimiert irgendwas, was Du tust. Wenn Dein Gewissen Dich
zwingt, irgendetwas zu loeschen, was jemand anders eingetragen hat, dann tu
das - aber Du musst dann eben auch die Verantwortung fuer die Konsequenzen
Am Samstag 05 März 2011, 15:06:05 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Hallo,
Guenther Meyer wrote:
Sehr schoen. Legitimiert das auch, dass ich Daten loesche, von denen ich
persoenlich denke, dass sie aus moralischen Gruenden nichts in OSM zu
suchen haben? Es lebe die Zensur!
Siehst Du, das ist
Ich habe im Hilfeforum gelesen, dass man U-Turns auch über einen Way
anstatt einen Node machen kann, aber wann macht das denn Sinn? Gibt
das nicht Probleme, wenn man den Way splittet?
Gruß Martin
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hi !
kann mir einer sagen warum das Gewerbegebiet innerhalb von
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/69714693 nicht richtig gerendert
wird trotz Multipolygon ?
Gruß jan .-)
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
On 05.03.11 16:47, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Ich habe im Hilfeforum gelesen, dass man U-Turns auch über einen Way
anstatt einen Node machen kann, aber wann macht das denn Sinn? Gibt
das nicht Probleme, wenn man den Way splittet?
Ich sehe bei einer Kreuzung, wo ein Zweig mit getrennten Ways je
Am 05.03.2011 18:53, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Hi !
kann mir einer sagen warum das Gewerbegebiet innerhalb von
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/69714693 nicht richtig
gerendert wird trotz Multipolygon ?
Klar.
Der von Dir verlinkte Way ist outer vom Multipolygon, aber nicht mehr
Am 05.03.2011 19:01, schrieb Peter Wendorff:
Am 05.03.2011 18:53, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
Hi !
kann mir einer sagen warum das Gewerbegebiet innerhalb von
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/69714693 nicht richtig
gerendert wird trotz Multipolygon ?
Klar.
Der von Dir verlinkte Way ist
Am 05.03.2011 19:01, schrieb Peter Wendorff:
Der von Dir verlinkte Way ist outer vom Multipolygon, aber nicht mehr
selbst natural=scrub.
Nimm das Tag weg von dem Weg und es sollte funktionieren.
Laut Bing ist dort aber scub. Ich denke er meint, dass das Innenteil
(commercial) nicht gerendert
Naja, das übliche MP Chaos. ;-)
Meine Vermutung:
wenn Tags außer type=multipolygon an der Relation hängen (in diesem Fall
comment=...), dann gelten die Tags am Outer-Way für die Gesamtfläche und
nicht nur für die Differnzfläche. So jedenfalls kann man die MP
Beschreibung im Wiki interpretieren.
Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
kann mir einer sagen warum das Gewerbegebiet innerhalb von
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/69714693 nicht richtig gerendert
wird trotz Multipolygon ?
Ich habe mal den Tag des outer in das Multipolygon übertragen aber
selbst das scheint nicht zu helfen.
Ich
Am 05.03.2011 11:35, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
place=locality ohne Namen macht doch keinen Sinn, der einzige Sinn von
locality ist ja gerade, einen Namen zu vergeben.
Richtig. Deshalb sucht Jan ja nach einer Möglichkeit, solche Fälle aufzuspüren.
weiß einer ob es irgendwo schon eine
Am 05.03.2011 20:01, schrieb Matthias Versen:
Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
kann mir einer sagen warum das Gewerbegebiet innerhalb von
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/69714693 nicht richtig gerendert
wird trotz Multipolygon ?
Ich habe mal den Tag des outer in das Multipolygon übertragen aber
Jan Tappenbeck wrote:
wo ???
Ich denke Du meinst mit wo das wo Du einen Bug Report erstellen kannst.
Die Antwort lautet : http://trac.openstreetmap.org/
Allerdings hat das umsetzen des Tags vom outer auf die Relation das
Problem behoben !
Ich hätte mehr Geduld haben sollen :-)
Matthias
Am 05.03.2011 15:43, schrieb Guenther Meyer:
Liste gesagt, dass das legitim ist...
Genau hier ist aber das Problem:
Wenn irgendwo auf der Liste oder im Wiki geschrieben steht dieses oder jenes
sollte nicht getaggt werden, weil es koennte ja missbraucht werden, finden
sich mit Sicherheit
Iniziamo a mappare opening_hours massicciamente!! :)
Mi raccomando attenzione alla sintassi corretta
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Opening_hours
Io trovo molto utile e comodo il plugin di josm.
Qui la mappa che visualizza gli orari:
2011/3/5 Alessio Zanol nar...@infinito.it:
Iniziamo a mappare opening_hours massicciamente!! :)
Mi raccomando attenzione alla sintassi corretta
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Opening_hours
anche service_times (per chiese) e wikipedia, website (per il sito
ufficiale), url (per eventuali
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 15:37:06 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/3/5 Alessio Zanol nar...@infinito.it:
Iniziamo a mappare opening_hours massicciamente!! :)
Mi raccomando attenzione alla sintassi corretta
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Opening_hours
anche service_times (per
2011/3/5 David Paleino da...@debian.org:
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 15:37:06 +0100, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
A proposito di website: io sto utilizzando contact:*=*, che ne pensate?
i.e. contact:website=*, contact:phone=*, contact:fax=*, e così via. È un tag
proposed, se ricordo bene :)
direi che è
Vorrei rilevare i numeri civici di Orosei (NU):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.37894lon=9.69252zoom=16layers=M
Ho pensato di andare a passeggio con GPS e macchina fotografica
temporalmente sincronizzati e scattare una foto a tutti i numeri civici
che incontro. Una volta tornato a casa
non serve fare i salti mortali visto che josm ha già la funzione per
sincronizzare foto e tracce gpx (ed anche quella per sincronizzare
l'audio)
Riguardo invece qgis c'è un plugin che trasforma in punti le
coordinate che legge dagli exif delle foto
mio consiglio però: fare tutto con qgis
ps: la
Alessio Zanol wrote:
Qui la mappa che visualizza gli orari:
http://www.netzwolf.info/kartografie/osm/time_domain/map_opening
bella... però perché non sono mostrati tutti gli elementi col tag
opening_hours? Ad esempio non compare nessuno di quelli inseriti da me...
--
View this message in
Il 05/03/2011 15.37, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer ha scritto:
Mappiamo più dettagli. Facendo delle foto dei insegni al posto è molto
facile di raccogliere un sacco di dettagli.
Più informazioni ci sono in una mappa e meglio è. Però è vero anche che
più sono tante e dettagliate le informazioni e più è
Il 05/03/2011 18.57, gianluca ha scritto:
Vorrei rilevare i numeri civici di Orosei (NU):
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.37894lon=9.69252zoom=16layers=M
Ho pensato di andare a passeggio con GPS e macchina fotografica
temporalmente sincronizzati e scattare una foto a tutti i numeri civici
Buongiorno,
è il mio primo msg, in ML, per cui perdonatemi eventuali strafalcioni.
Vado in giro in bici e credo sia utile taggar fontane
(amenities=drinking_water) sopratutto d'estate :-)
Vedo però che il browser OSM in modalità open cycle map non le visualizza,
oltre al fatto che se cerco i
Il 06 marzo 2011 08:26, Cascafico Giovanni cascaf...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Buongiorno,
è il mio primo msg, in ML, per cui perdonatemi eventuali strafalcioni.
Vado in giro in bici e credo sia utile taggar fontane
(amenities=drinking_water) sopratutto d'estate :-)
Vedo però che il browser OSM
hola. cuenta creada en wiziq con carlosgc...@gmail.com
___
Talk-co mailing list
Talk-co@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-co
Rasmus Vendelboe r.vendelboe+osm@... writes:
Løsning 3 (name=Gammel Århusvej, short_name=Gl Århusvej) har
problemet, at name og short_name nogle gange er en og samme
ting. Selvom Short_name i realiteten er et 'nyt tag' skal nye
OSM'ere i fremtiden holde tungen lige i munden, da tagget ligger
Lørdag 05 marts 2011 20:37:34 skrev Ole Laursen:
Hej!
Feedback søges til den her:
http://people.iola.dk/olau/misc/cykelgangsti.jpg
Det er en bred cykelsti og en parallel ligeledes temmelig bred gangsti med
en rabat imellem. Det er fra Aalborg Øst hvor der nogle stykker af den
slags
On 05-03-2011 20:00, Ole Laursen wrote:
Rasmus Vendelboer.vendelboe+osm@... writes:
Løsning 3 (name=Gammel Århusvej, short_name=Gl Århusvej) har
problemet, at name og short_name nogle gange er en og samme
ting. Selvom Short_name i realiteten er et 'nyt tag' skal nye
OSM'ere i fremtiden holde
Buenas
¿Alguien sabe si existe un planificador de viajes (o algo similar) basado en
OSM?
Gracias!
Saludos
Jimena
___
Talk-es mailing list
Talk-es@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-es
El 05/03/11 12:40, Julio Torres escribió:
Alguien me puede decir com cambiar en JOSM el color de las lineas de
eje de las calles para no confundir con otras entidades, como por
ejemplo: para el trazado de una manzana próxima al eje de via?
Ctrl+W
___
El 04/03/11 22:53, Javier Sanchez escribió:
Hola
Para actividades en la naturaleza
http://openmtbmap.org/
Hay una pagina que se llama mispicaderos . net que también es para
actividades en la naturaleza
(lo siento no me he podido aguantar) :-)
--
Todo cuchillo desafilado, tendrá el filo
El 05/03/11 10:55, Jimena escribió:
Buenas
¿Alguien sabe si existe un planificador de viajes (o algo similar) basado en
OSM?
Jimena,
Quizas alguno de estos programas te valga:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Software/Desktop#Navigating_features
--
Todo cuchillo desafilado, tendrá el
El 28/02/11 23:29, Carlos Dávila escribió:
El 28/02/11 23:08, Iván Pérez escribió:
Hola a todos.
Como ya todos sabréis el 7 de marzo la velocidad máxima en España en
autovías y autopistas se verá disminuida a los 110 km/h. Supongo que
habrá que actualizar todos los tags maxspeed de todas las
El 5 de marzo de 2011 15:23, Carlos Dávila cdavi...@orangecorreo.esescribió:
El 28/02/11 23:29, Carlos Dávila escribió:
El 28/02/11 23:08, Iván Pérez escribió:
Hola a todos.
Como ya todos sabréis el 7 de marzo la velocidad máxima en España en
autovías y autopistas se verá disminuida a
Ich habs jetzt auf die Icons draufgeschrieben, z.B. 50 | 100 (schaut
allerdings ein bisserl seltsam aus, weil der Text aus dem Icon rausragt,
aber da fällt mir keine schnelle Lösung ein).
Das mit Linien nebeneinander lässt sich derzeit leider noch nicht machen,
da müssen wir auf eine neue
Hallo,
zwei Fragen zu o.g. Themen:
a) In Österreich gibt es 356 nodes mit amenity=parking,parking=underground,
aber nur 22 ways. Ich nehme das als Bestätigung, dass es sinnvoll und üblich
ist, Tiefgaragen mit einem entsprechenden node (an der Einfahrt) zu taggen und
nicht flächig.
- Autofahrer
I've fixed some continuity errors, etc. on Hwy 417 near Ottawa.
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 7:13 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
I've fixed some continuity errors, etc. on Hwy 417 near Ottawa.
I'm working now on the rest of 417, then I'll tackle 416. Ottawa is a
mess. A disaster.
___
Talk-ca mailing list
fixed QEW at 403. overlapping nodes not connected
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
fixed QEW at 403. overlapping nodes not connected
QEW at Hidden Valley. same.
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
Hwy 1;97/5 interchange west of Kamloops: heading east on 1, then
changing to south on 5, motorway_link incorrectly tagged as oneway.
Sam L, should [http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/24446790] be a
two-directional single carriageway or one way dual carriageways (has a
concrete Jersey barrier
Yes... I believe you have that correct now. No barrier as I remember.
Thanks.
The interchange at Highway 93 (Icefields Parkway) and the TransCanada
was not routing correctly coming south off the Parkway. I made some
minor edits there and hopefully that will fix it, but the Bing coverage
is
About 100 meters of Hwy 93 was missing just west of BC/Alberta border
(yup, just plain gone). Fixed now.
Adam
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Samuel Longiaru longi...@shaw.ca wrote:
Yes... I believe you have that correct now. No barrier as I remember.
Thanks.
The interchange at Highway 93
Anybody got a claim on user user_5365?
[http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/user_5365/]
This user is doing lots of Canvec importing, and is actually
self-identifying as a bot (with the tag bot=yes). Rather
disconcerting, considering the fierce debate that happened just a
couple weeks ago over on
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Adam Dunn dunna...@gmail.com wrote:
Anybody got a claim on user user_5365?
[http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/user_5365/]
This user is doing lots of Canvec importing, and is actually
self-identifying as a bot (with the tag bot=yes). Rather
disconcerting,
I'll second what Richard said. This whole argument of talk could have
been avoided (or at least delayed) if someone had tried contacting me
before I was accused. Perhaps I'm just upset but in my opinion it's
better to raise the issue with the user first than on a list. We don't
want another
MB TCH: fix bad oneway at PTH 44
___
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
I've found the people on talk-ca to be a little calmer, so I thought
it would be okay to send a message here. I wouldn't say people here
are less opinionated, but I think they are less vociferous about their
opinions, and I think that's due to the small size of the list.
Shortly after my first
Langley, BC: Hwy 1 west to 56 Ave at 1/13 interchange: short section
marked as oneway when it shouldn't be. Fixed.
Just south of Merritt, at the 5/5C/97A interchange, heading north on
5, then going east on 97C, there's a traffic-lit intersection with
97C. Since 97C is dual carriageway, the
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
