Hi,
Got a project involving transit and would like to know what are the
available open source transit suites. Looked at openplans. Any others out
there?
--
Regards,
Jude Mwenda
Skype id: jmwenda
Twitter: www.twitter.com/judemwenda
Web: www.africangeogeek.com
Was ist mein Leben, wenn ich nicht
Hi Jude
Can you import transit data from OpenStreetMap or massage it to a
format like google's transit data?
Shoaib
--
http://twitter.com/sabman
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:00 AM, jude mwenda judemwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Got a project involving transit and would like to know what are the
I have this hunch that the name Rizal (our national hero) is the most
popular street name in the Philippines. So I counted. On first pass,
I have this results:
Top names on highway ways:
frequency name
164 Subic-Clark-Tarlac Expressway
154 Floodway B
130 National Highway
114 MacArthur
Nice!
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:20 AM, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Done by Totor: http://osm.org/go/4tRH4mQAj--
:-)
___
talk-ph mailing list
talk-ph@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ph
--
The only places where Yahoo has imagery that Bing doesn't are the following:
1. Small parts of Pampanga: rural eastern parts of San Fernando; Sta.
Ana; northern parts of San Simon. This area is partially covered by
the mid-res SPOT5 imagery though.
2. Southern parts of Samal City including
2011/6/17 Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com:
The goal of that statement was to allow any contributions that have been
derived from our PhotoMaps under our current licence (which is what imposes
the CC-BY-SA redistribution condition) can remain in the OSM db. Not being
a lawyer, I'm not going to
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
The goal of that statement was to allow any contributions that have been
derived from our PhotoMaps under our current licence (which is what imposes
the CC-BY-SA redistribution condition) can remain in the OSM db. Not being
Hi Dermot,
That's not a bad start - but if I play spot-the-missing-bit, it looks
to me that you aren't prepared to trust 2/3 of the community to decide
that (for reasons not yet forseen) a licence other than the two you
list and which may not be copyleft/sharealike.
Please note that the CT
Hi,
On 06/17/11 11:18, John Smith wrote:
Only if the amount of data traced is not substantial.
CC-by-SA makes no such distinction, it's either cc-by-sa or it's not
cc-by-sa, so which license can tiles be put under?
Sorry, I thought you had asked about tracing from tiles.
Tiles can be put
On 18 June 2011 00:06, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 06/17/11 11:18, John Smith wrote:
Only if the amount of data traced is not substantial.
CC-by-SA makes no such distinction, it's either cc-by-sa or it's not
cc-by-sa, so which license can tiles be put under?
Sorry, I
On 18 June 2011 00:54, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:44 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 18 June 2011 00:40, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I am not trying to apply patents to OSM. I am trying to use the example of
patents
Because you want to sell/offer s service in the EU, enter one of the
countries and numerous other reasons. As long as you don't make the
derived database available or publish the contents in some form -in- the
EU you are not in trouble, just if.
Simon
Am 17.06.2011 16:54, schrieb John
On 18 June 2011 01:10, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Because you want to sell/offer s service in the EU, enter one of the
countries and numerous other reasons. As long as you don't make the derived
database available or publish the contents in some form -in- the EU you are
not in trouble,
On 17 June 2011 16:48, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
On 06/17/11 16:39, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
1. IIRC the newer versions of CC-By-SA include statements to ensure
that the content is not protected by database rights, patents or DRM,
which would prevent their uses.
News to me.
On Friday, 17 June 2011, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer o...@amen-online.de wrote:
Please note that the CT do not guarantee a 2/3 majority of the community. Only
a part of the community is entitled to vote.
I read your other mail on that topic. I don't personally have any
objection to addressing
On 17 June 2011 17:17, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 17 June 2011 16:48, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
On 06/17/11 16:39, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
1. IIRC the newer versions of CC-By-SA include statements to ensure
that the content is not protected by database
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:01 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 June 2011 00:54, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:44 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 18 June 2011 00:40, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I am
2011/6/17 Dermot McNally derm...@gmail.com:
On Friday, 17 June 2011, Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer o...@amen-online.de wrote:
I read your other mail on that topic. I don't personally have any
objection to addressing weaknesses in the definition of active
contributor.
If we take the voting issues
Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer schrieb:
The first problem is that the right to vote depends upon being allowed to
contribute.
It it defined anywhere what contribute means? I have heard statements
before that sending messages, e.g. in here, also counts as a
contribution, as does replying to a
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer schrieb:
The first problem is that the right to vote depends upon being allowed to
contribute.
It it defined anywhere what contribute means?
From the contributor terms v1.2.4
An active
The CT/License Vote was IMHO not meant to be a serious democratic
process. Instead a majority was searched for a OSMF decision:
cynism on
like non anonymous voting for a single party in some countries
where your lose your job if voting against -fill in your favorite dictator-
cynism off
As long as
Word in quotes below relate to the meanings given them by ODbL
Assume I use jxapi to download an extract of the main OSM database . Is the
downloaded extract a Derivative Database, or since the download was
provided by OSM does the downloaded data qualify as simply a Database?
Regards
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:09 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
Word in quotes below relate to the meanings given them by ODbL
Assume I use jxapi to download an extract of the main OSM database . Is the
downloaded extract a Derivative Database, or since the download was
provided
On 18 June 2011 05:25, davespod osmli...@dellams.fastmail.fm wrote:
In a similar vein, I think OSMF and any other publisher of OSM-derived map
tiles under CC-by-SA would be well advised to be explicit about what it is
they are licensing under CC-by-SA. In other words, they should follow the
Hello,
I would suggest that images are updated from countries that are currently inan
upheaval as Egypt, Tunisia, Libya
Am 16.06.2011 um 23:09 schrieb Steve Coast:
Hi
I'm speaking personally and there are no guarantees here but I'd like to get
input on what areas you would like Bing to
Hallo,
I used Mapnik and osm.xml as default StyleSheet. There are not any green ara on
the map. Please let me know, where can I get a better StyleSheet like map of
OpenStreetMap.org ?
Please see the Attachment.
Thanks,
Saphy
attachment:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:35 AM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote:
That sounds like a great idea. (Does Merkaartor have support for this?)
'source' in the changeset has the disadvantage that it disappears from the
planet dumps or simple API extracts. This can be a legal issue for some
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 04:29:51PM +0100, Thomas Davie wrote:
On 16 Jun 2011, at 16:04, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
No, it would be simpler for OSM.
If you're willing to public domain your work, you're willing to give
it to anyone under any terms. Why would you
Is there a way you can contribute the data to Factual, or Needlebase,
or one of those other data sharey platforms? They have good tools for
visualising data online.
Steve
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Dear All,
Have you ever wondered about a changeset
On 17/06/11 09:34, Steve Bennett wrote:
Also, a question I should probably know the answer to: is ODbL
considered compatible with CC-BY-SA? Can you relicense something that
is CC-BY-SA as ODbL? (I guess the answer must be yes, but could
someone confirm?)
The answer is no, unless the person
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
In my opinion, changeset-based sources also make it clear which edit was
using which source. For example, since good Bing imagery has become
available, I've developed a habit to trace the buildings in an area from
Bing,
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:06:13AM +0200, Pieren wrote:
[...]
then compensated by local survey or aerial imagery. The result is that many
contributions are often a mix of different sources.
Actually thats what OSM is all about. A mix of many different sources. Thats
why the source tag was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 17/06/2011 08:15, Gehling Marc a écrit :
I would suggest that images are updated from countries that are
currently inan upheaval as Egypt, Tunisia, Libya
Hi,
+1.
High resolution coverage of Libya, Tunisia and Algeria is currently
limited to
On 17 June 2011 18:38, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
Data from an ODbL database may however be used to create a BY-SA
Produced Work.
So this means produced works can be traced into a cc-by-sa data set then?
___
legal-talk mailing list
source tags are most useful if you think the source may be wrong
(out-of-date, out-of-position), or if you think there's dubiety about
the usability of the source. The rest of the time, it's probably just
background noise.
___
talk mailing list
Hi,
On 06/17/11 08:15, Gehling Marc wrote:
I would suggest that images are updated from countries that are
currently inan upheaval as Egypt, Tunisia, Libya
What Would FakeSteveC say?
http://fakestevec.blogspot.com/2011/04/know-your-osm-memes-4.html
Oh, that.
Jokes aside, I think the ideal
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:42 AM, Jochen Topf joc...@remote.org wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:06:13AM +0200, Pieren wrote:
[...]
then compensated by local survey or aerial imagery. The result is that
many
contributions are often a mix of different sources.
Actually thats what OSM is
On 17/06/2011 06:35, Ed Avis wrote:
This is not really a technical question but one of convention: are
per-changeset
source tags generally accepted practice in the project these days?
I suspect that it varies by community. My experience locally is that
on-the-ground mappers tend to use
On 17/06/2011 09:42, Jochen Topf wrote:
The source tag can sometimes be some help in figuring out the history
of an
object. After it was entered in OSM we have a complete history, before that the
source tag can sometimes help. But it is far less useful in practice than many
think. Exactly
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
The time to get a map is on the order of 5-8 minutes for me...
5-8 minutes?? For me, it's more like 10 seconds. Opera, on a
university internet
Hi Grant,
Please list the problematic language you are referring to... Your
email on the 18th of Jan or your email in reply to Kai on the 6th Feb.
I see several small problems in the CT and two bigger problems. The bigger
problems are related to the definition of active contributor.
The
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:19 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
when all the nearmap-derived data is removed
It seems like you missed an email a couple of days ago?
Current NearMap derived data does not need to be removed from OSM
during the license change.
Hi,
On 06/17/11 16:20, John Smith wrote:
Patents don't apply here
I am trying to make a general point about the scope of CC licenses, to
which the patents example is relevant.
Do you or do you not agree, that if a picture describing a patent is
made available under CC-BY-SA (and NOT
On 06/17/11 16:06, John Smith wrote:
So once again I'm met with silence and can only assume that produced
works licensed under cc-by or cc-by-sa can be derived from,
Do read the discussions I had with odc-discuss when someone asked about
this before:
On 18 June 2011 00:30, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 06/17/11 16:20, John Smith wrote:
Patents don't apply here
I am trying to make a general point about the scope of CC licenses, to which
the patents example is relevant.
Do you or do you not agree, that if a picture
On 18 June 2011 00:32, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On 06/17/11 16:06, John Smith wrote:
So once again I'm met with silence and can only assume that produced
works licensed under cc-by or cc-by-sa can be derived from,
Do read the discussions I had with odc-discuss when someone asked
Hi,
(this is offtopic, I know)
On 17 June 2011 16:06, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
On 06/17/11 11:18, John Smith wrote:
Only if the amount of data traced is not substantial.
CC-by-SA makes no such distinction, it's either cc-by-sa or it's not
cc-by-sa, so which license can tiles
Hi,
On 06/17/11 16:35, John Smith wrote:
I am trying to make a general point about the scope of CC licenses, to which
the patents example is relevant.
Do you or do you not agree, that if a picture describing a patent is made
available under CC-BY-SA (and NOT CC-BY-ND), one's ability to
On 18 June 2011 00:40, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I am not trying to apply patents to OSM. I am trying to use the example of
patents to prove to you that your reasoning either something is CC-BY-SA or
it isn't is, in this simplicity, invalid; that there may well exist
limitations
2011/6/17 andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com:
2. What happens if a person in country A with database rights
publishes a tileset and licenses it under CC-By-SA to a person in
country B without database rights? The second person is then as far
as I can see not bound by database rights or a
Hi,
On 06/17/11 16:39, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
1. IIRC the newer versions of CC-By-SA include statements to ensure
that the content is not protected by database rights, patents or DRM,
which would prevent their uses.
News to me. Do you have a pointer?
It is true that CC-BY-SA, for as long
Am 17.06.2011 16:39, schrieb andrzej zaborowski:
...
2. What happens if a person in country A with database rights
publishes a tileset and licenses it under CC-By-SA to a person in
country B without database rights? The second person is then as far
as I can see not bound by database rights
On 18 June 2011 00:50, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Am 17.06.2011 16:39, schrieb andrzej zaborowski:
...
2. What happens if a person in country A with database rights
publishes a tileset and licenses it under CC-By-SA to a person in
country B without database rights? The second
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:44 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 June 2011 00:40, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I am not trying to apply patents to OSM. I am trying to use the example of
patents to prove to you that your reasoning either something is CC-BY-SA or
On 17/06/11 15:39, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
1. IIRC the newer versions of CC-By-SA include statements to ensure
that the content is not protected by database rights, patents or DRM,
which would prevent their uses. Does that mean that only the older
licenses can be used for produced works?
Hi Frederik,
Yes I agree that the arm chair mapping isn't the best method of
collection. Though in some areas it will be difficult to ever have
mappers on the ground without imagery. The cost of a GPS is
prohibitive in many places.
I've been working with some rural areas in Indonesia and it
On 18 June 2011 01:18, Kate Chapman k...@maploser.com wrote:
Hi Frederik,
Yes I agree that the arm chair mapping isn't the best method of
collection. Though in some areas it will be difficult to ever have
mappers on the ground without imagery. The cost of a GPS is
prohibitive in many
On 18 June 2011 01:46, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me try copyright-only examples.
I can take up the full text of all of the works of William
Shakespeare, compile it into a book with annotations, and release the
book under CC-BY-SA. Now since the original text by
Hi,
On 06/17/11 17:18, Kate Chapman wrote:
Yes I agree that the arm chair mapping isn't the best method of
collection. Though in some areas it will be difficult to ever have
mappers on the ground without imagery. The cost of a GPS is
prohibitive in many places.
Oh I wasn't referring to any
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:07 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18 June 2011 01:46, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me try copyright-only examples.
I can take up the full text of all of the works of William
Shakespeare, compile it into a book with annotations,
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:07 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
Then you have a whole other argument over what constitutes a produced
work and so on.
It's a novel concept, to be sure. but if you want to understand it
better you can always ask the licence's authors on odc-discuss.
On 18 June 2011 02:26, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think you're going to get clear answers about these specific
cases. It will take a court decision to provide precedent rulings on
such things.
Well the copyright side of things seems pretty simple, especially if
people
On 18 June 2011 02:40, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:07 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
Then you have a whole other argument over what constitutes a produced
work and so on.
It's a novel concept, to be sure. but if you want to understand it
Right, what I was trying to propose was if making imagery available would
spark community in some places.
Kate
On Jun 17, 2011 12:23 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 06/17/11 17:18, Kate Chapman wrote:
Yes I agree that the arm chair mapping isn't the best method of
A xml extract of the changeset of the user would be great :) Maybe heavy?
Yves
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Dear All,
Have you ever wondered about a changeset comment from a particular
mapper, but found that browsing through a changeset was a little
Not so badly mapped, but Switzerland seriously lack of images (except
the R-Pod project). Given the currency rate, it may not be the good year
to buy ortho from SwissTopo. I wouldn't call that a priority though.
Yves
On 16. 06. 11 23:09, Steve Coast wrote:
Hi
I'm speaking personally and
Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
Let me try copyright-only examples.
I can take up the full text of all of the works of William
Shakespeare, compile it into a book with annotations, and release the
book under CC-BY-SA. Now since the original text by Shakespeare is
already in the public domain, I
With Mapnik, you'll need the complete polygon in your datasource to
render it.
Maybe you can find some help here:
http://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/mapnik-users
Yves
On 17. 06. 11 09:32, Saphy Mo wrote:
Hallo,
I used Mapnik and osm.xml as default StyleSheet. There are not any
green
Steve Coast st...@asklater.com schrieb:
I'm speaking personally and there are no guarantees here but I'd like
to
get input on what areas you would like Bing to prioritise for aerial
and/or satellite imagery in the coming year.
Large areas of Switzerland have pretty low resolution. A couple
Can somebody please help? How come a perfectly legal osmChange, containing just
a single way, is being rejected time and again?
I attach the HTTP traffic captured by wireshark.
Thank you,
dimka
From: kkl_imp...@hotmail.com
To: nice...@att.net; talk@openstreetmap.org
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011
Hi all,
I am doing a large upload (~600k nodes, ~4k ways, 280 relations) using the
bulk_upload.py script.
Up to some point everything was fine, all the nodes got uploaded, and also half
of the ways, but then it started to return the 500 Internal Server Error
message.
Attached
Am 17.06.2011 20:47, schrieb Richard Weait:
3) Hypothetically, a contributor could upload gpx tracks and never edit.
[...]
I think 3) could be valuable, but is not necessarily a contributor.
Does anybody know if there are any accounts / users in category 3?
while a holiday last year i
- Original Message -
From: Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] application of ODBL to an extarct of OSM
obtained via jxapi
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 09:16 -0500, Toby Murray wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:19 PM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
when all the nearmap-derived data is removed
It seems like you missed an email a couple of days ago?
Current NearMap derived data does not need to be removed
Thanks for the summary.
On 16 June 2011 16:32, Rob Truxler rtrux...@gmail.com wrote:
geoiq has a nice road layer that is very simple, no icons, just white roads
with legible labels. Depending on your application, the simplicity of the
acetate road layer can be appealing:
Steve Coast wrote on 17/06/2011 at 08:09:37 +1100
subject [OSM-talk] Bing aerial imagery priorities :
I'm speaking personally and there are no guarantees here but I'd like to
get input on what areas you would like Bing to prioritise for aerial
and/or satellite imagery in the coming year.
In plaats van hakken in het zand zoek ik liever met anderen naar een
constructieve omgang.
Maar het zijn altijd dezelfden die een constructieve omgang zoeken, namelijk
de mensen met een bepaalde passie voor het vak/de hobby met een redelijke
instelling of,
-zoals ik het liever zeg- door de
Dank je Henk.
Er is een fundamenteel verschil van appreciatie met
de gang van zaken tussen ons.
Jij ziet de zaken vanuit het perspectief van het resultaat (voor OSM).
Ik zie het vanuit de gang van zaken voor de community.
Het huidige OSMF is dusdanig pragmatisch dat het werkelijk
elk
Gert,
Jij wilt een argument voor de ODbL en tegen de CC? CC is bedoeld als
licentie voor zaken waarop _auteursrecht_ berust. Dat geldt niet voor
_data_, aangezien hier geen _creatieve_ inspanning geleverd hoeft te
worden. (Vandaar 'creative' in Creative Commons). De huidige situatie
betekent
Gert,
Ik ga toch maar happen. Zie inline.
Frank
On 11-06-17 08:51 PM, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Oh ja henk je vroeg om een verklarinen
Zie inline
*Van:*Henk Hoff [mailto:toffeh...@gmail.com]
*Verzonden:* vrijdag 17 juni 2011 19:08
*Aan:* OpenStreetMap NL
Tsja, wat moet ik daar allemaal op antwoorden.
Ik laat het even bij deze vraag:
Heb je één argument
behalve “niet werk” en “uit de voeten”
Ja hoor, meerdere. Lees ze na op
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/License/Why_CC_BY-SA_is_Unsuitable
Gr,
Henk H.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 1:23 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
The goal of that statement was to allow any contributions that have been
derived from our PhotoMaps under our current licence (which is what imposes
the CC-BY-SA redistribution condition) can remain in the OSM db. Not being
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:42 AM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
That is the reason why very little effort has been expended mapping
Australia lately, until we know what skeleton of data we'll have left to
work with after the changeover.
If you want to map for OSM at the moment,
On 17 June 2011 18:38, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:42 AM, David Murn da...@incanberra.com.au wrote:
That is the reason why very little effort has been expended mapping
Australia lately, until we know what skeleton of data we'll have left to
work with
Since (for the areas it covers) Nearmap is likely to be to most up-to-date
imagery available, we can use it to spot where new roads have sprung up in
towns that do not currently have an active mapper driving around. We can
then schedule a trip to said town to remedy the situation.
For other
Hallo Jens!
Danke für die Überlegungen, die du angestellt hast, finde ich sehr wichtig.
Vielleicht hilft das diesem etwas verrückten Projektchen weiter.
Jens Poenisch wrote:
Navigation über Inhaltsverzeichnis ist möglich, ebenso natürlich
Vorwärts-/Rückwärtsblättern - wir benötigen aber 4
Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Langer Rede kurzer Sinn: ich würde keine der Marken, Bildmarken oder
Wort-/Bildmarken in einer Karte, Legende oder irgendwas ähnliches
verwenden, und genauso natürlich auch Logos von anderen Organsisationen
nicht, auch wenn die vielleicht es nicht ganz so
Hallo allerseits,
kurze Frage bzgl. der Refresh-zyklen von OpenCycleMap. Laut Theorie
aktualisiert OCM die Kacheln innerhalb a few days; jedoch präferiert nach der
Nutzungsintensität der einzelnen Kacheln.
Nun habe ich aber mittlerweile zwei Radrouten im Süden Deutschlands schon vor
ca. einem
Deine Erfahrungen decken sich mit meinen (schon das ganze Jahr), hab
auch schon 2 Monate gewartet bevor etwas auf irgendeinem Zoomlevel
gerendert wurde, mehrere Wochen ist der Normalfall (und auf allen Stufen
kanns man eh vergessen). Was auch typisch ist, ist dass wenn gerendert
wird, es mit
Danke Simon.
Ich habe indes sogar das Gefühl, OCM sei in den letzten beiden Wochen nochmals
langsamer geworden als zuvor schon. Fürs Radln benutze ich gerne meine
iPhone+GeoGuide-Kombination. Mit letzterem kann man im Voraus einer Tour die
entsprechenden Kacheln herunterladen (was eben schnell
Am 17.06.2011 14:19, schrieb Dennie Reinhold:
Danke Simon.
Ich habe indes sogar das Gefühl, OCM sei in den letzten beiden Wochen nochmals
langsamer geworden als zuvor schon. Fürs Radln benutze ich gerne meine
iPhone+GeoGuide-Kombination. Mit letzterem kann man im Voraus einer Tour die
hi !
hat einer von Euch schon mit der aktellen Version einen parallelen Weg
erzeugen können ??
Habe 4138 gezogen und in den News wird Umschalt+P dafür aufgeführt - im
Pull-Down ist das aber noch für Objekte Teilen (Werkzeuge 2) reserviert.
Gruß Jan :-)
Am 17. Juni 2011 14:19 schrieb Dennie Reinhold rhinh...@googlemail.com:
Ich habe indes sogar das Gefühl, OCM sei in den letzten beiden Wochen
nochmals langsamer geworden als zuvor schon. Fürs Radln benutze ich gerne
meine iPhone+GeoGuide-Kombination. Mit letzterem kann man im Voraus einer
Am 17. Juni 2011 15:38 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck o...@tappenbeck.net:
hi !
hat einer von Euch schon mit der aktellen Version einen parallelen Weg
erzeugen können ??
Habe 4138 gezogen und in den News wird Umschalt+P dafür aufgeführt - im
Pull-Down ist das aber noch für Objekte Teilen
Kay hat mit der Karte auf:
http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/tile/11/1275/935/
exakt das entdeckt, was auf dem Kindle Sinn machen würde.
Danke für die Mühe.
Ich habe dies mal mit dem Kindle-Internet-Browser über WiFi aufgerufen
und das ist ganz ok und ist dann sogar navigierbar.
Nur
Wolfgang wrote:
In der 1.7 funktionieren sie gerade dann.
Tatsache... Funktioniert schon erstaunlich gut. Man kann mit einem kleinen
OSM-Export in mehreren Schritten mit direktem Feedback relativ ordentliche
Kartenstile erstellen...
Was mich noch etwas stört: Die Straßenbreiten haben feste
Hallo Mapper,
nur als Hinweis:
Ich habe gerade erschrocken festgestellt das das Passwort meines Accounts
(User tixuwuoz) auf Grund eines Softwarefehlers meinerseits seit langer
Zeit öffentlich
im Netz einsehbar war.
Ich habe das Passwort geändert und den Fehler behoben, da ich jedoch zu
viele
Schick mir mal die Datei ggf kann ich da was machen.
Dirk
Am 15. Juni 2011 13:14 schrieb Sven Geggus li...@fuchsschwanzdomain.de:
Lars Schimmer l.schim...@cgv.tugraz.at wrote:
(die AllInOne nutz ich gerade, aber die ist nicht speziell genug fürs
Radfahren).
Ich habe noch irgendwo eine
Am 17.06.2011 00:03, schrieb Simon Poole:
Ich hab mir mal kurz die Mühe gemacht und eine Markenrecherche in FR gemacht.
Der Wanderverband ist recht fleissig in Markeneintragen,
was aber wohl relevant ist, ist die französische Marke 3283810.
Bildmarke: rotes Quadrat mit weissem GR. Eingetragen
Hallo!
Bin zu blöd, wie seih man nochmals in JOSM die Richtung einer oneway-Spur?
--
Mit freundlichen Gruessen
Wolfgang Wienke
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
